Boycott Israel

[Hollie]

The Zionists have had in international bullshit machine for over a hundred years, but “genocide,” “apartheid,” “ethnic cleansing,” “settler colonialism,” and “racism.” is a tough sell.

People are starting to smell the bullshit.

Curiously, those are the slogans you dump in many threads. Usually, the dumping is via silly YouTube videos. Those slogans clearly are a tough sell for the propagandist when they’re used with little regard for their definition or application. It’s really just an appeal to flaming and to emotion.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Curiously, those are the slogans you dump in many threads. Usually, the dumping is via silly YouTube videos. Those slogans clearly are a tough sell for the propagandist when they’re used with little regard for their definition or application. It’s really just an appeal to flaming and to emotion.

Almost everything said by Israel is a lie,

 

[Hollie]

Almost everything said by Israel is a lie,

Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Link?

750,000 people expelled from "a land without people."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

750,000 people expelled from "a land without people."

How many ran away under orders of the Arab armies?

 

[Hollie]

750,000 people expelled from "a land without people."

Aside from that not being an Israeli phrase, Is that “almost everything”?

 

[P F Tinmore]

How many ran away under orders of the Arab armies?

Only about 2%.

BTW, why they left does not matter.

 

[TeeDub]

How the fuck am I supposed to boycott Israel? Do they produce something that I use?

Ignorance is bliss! Fool.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Only about 2%.

BTW, why they left does not matter.

Only about 2%.

Link?

BTW, why they left does not matter.

It matters to your claim they were expelled.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Only about 2%.

Link?

BTW, why they left does not matter.

It matters to your claim they were expelled.

Oops, I said 2%. My bad.

As for Arab calls for flight, these were reckoned to be significant in only 5% of cases...

1948 Palestinian exodus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Hollie]

Oops, I said 2%. My bad.

1948 Palestinian exodus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

All the usual sidestepping and dancing to retract your earlier claims.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Settler Colonialism is an entangled term.

I don't believe that there is a law that specifically addresses setler colonialism. However, settler colonialism is an act of aggression that violates all of the basic inaleinable rights of a people.

 

[Hollie]

I don't believe that there is a law that specifically addresses setler colonialism. However, settler colonialism is an act of aggression that violates all of the basic inaleinable rights of a people.

The history of Islamic war, rapine and conquest.

 

[Sixties Fan]

( Boycott Israel, waste 5 years )

Sudan’s Mohamed Abdalrasool skips bout with Tohar Butbul, who wins next fight but loses medal chances later; athlete is no-show despite Khartoum signing Abraham Accords with Israel​

2nd judoka pulls out of Olympics in apparent move to avoid facing Israeli

Sudan's Mohamed Abdalrasool skips bout with Tohar Butbul, who wins next fight but loses medal chances later; athlete is no-show despite Khartoum signing Abraham Accords with Israel

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
SUBTOPIC: Colonialism and Aggression
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: "Settler Colonialism" → are politically motivated "descriptive words" assembled in a way to sound official and impressive. These words are entangled in such a way as to convince you (the reader and audience) that there is some underlying true concept that supports the idea that it is somehow "illegal" or "evil." It is a technique used to convince people that there is a precise meaning and universally accepted relationship to the nature and role within the framework of international law. Any "Human Rights" (inalienable or not) which are not codified in law are more related to "ethics and morality." And in most cases, when the Hostile Arab Palestinians apply "Human Rights" (inalienable or not) which are not codified in law are to impart upon the audience that there is actually some uniformly accepted understanding of exactly what these rights are within the international community (which there is not). Hence, the need for the nine core international human rights instruments. The Preamble to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) discusses the "recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world." AND, beyond the first paragraph in the Preamble, the term " inalienable rights" is not mentioned.

I don't believe that there is a law that specifically addresses setler colonialism. However, settler colonialism is an act of aggression that violates all of the basic inaleinable rights of a people.

(COMMENT)

NOTE: Your assertion here → "settler colonialism" (an undefined term) is a process whereby the territory already ​

subject to the sovereignty of another State (undefined) is being acquired.​

It should be reemphasized that the Israelis have not taken control of even the tiniest sliver of territory that was under the sovereign control of the Arab Palestinians.

Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State. [A/RES/29/3314 (1974)]

IF you stand by your allegation that "settler colonialism" (specific definition required) "is an act of aggression" (as defined by A/RES/29/3314) THEN what are the two states involved? What state lost what sovereign territory?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[rylah]

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
SUBTOPIC: Colonialism and Aggression
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: "Settler Colonialism" → are politically motivated "descriptive words" assembled in a way to sound official and impressive. These words are entangled in such a way as to convince you (the reader and audience) that there is some underlying true concept that supports the idea that it is somehow "illegal" or "evil." It is a technique used to convince people that there is a precise meaning and universally accepted relationship to the nature and role within the framework of international law. Any "Human Rights" (inalienable or not) which are not codified in law are more related to "ethics and morality." And in most cases, when the Hostile Arab Palestinians apply "Human Rights" (inalienable or not) which are not codified in law are to impart upon the audience that there is actually some uniformly accepted understanding of exactly what these rights are within the international community (which there is not). Hence, the need for the nine core international human rights instruments. The Preamble to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) discusses the "recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world." AND, beyond the first paragraph in the Preamble, the term " inalienable rights" is not mentioned.


(COMMENT)

NOTE: Your assertion here → "settler colonialism" (an undefined term) is a process whereby the territory already ​

subject to the sovereignty of another State (undefined) is being acquired.​

It should be reemphasized that the Israelis have not taken control of even the tiniest sliver of territory that was under the sovereign control of the Arab Palestinians.

Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State. [A/RES/29/3314 (1974)]

IF you stand by your allegation that "settler colonialism" (specific definition required) "is an act of aggression" (as defined by A/RES/29/3314) THEN what are the two states involved? What state lost what sovereign territory?

Most Respectfully,
R

Settler colonialism is well defined in academic circles. It has yet to find its way into international law. However, most of the tenets of settler colonialism are already addressed by international law.

• Settler colonialism is inherently aggressive. People do not get colonized voluntarily. It requires military force.
• Land theft/conquest violate the right to territorial integrity.
• Self determination and sovereignty are violated.
• Apartheid is necessary to divide us from them, from the superior and the inferior.
• Ethnic cleansing remove the natives to be replaced by colonial settlers.

WCRC: Foucs: Palestine - 6. Is Israel A Settler Colonial State?​

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]