Boehner lashes out at conservatives

Boehner lashes out at conservative groups over budget deal ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Boehner finally grew a pair! But now the baggers will be coming after him!

Amazing how the left wing bigots keep close tabs on Boehner and still manage to insult the good people of the Tea Party. The dirty little secret that Boehner doesn't seem to grasp is that the radical left is terrified of the Tea Party and conservative agenda.

:lmao:
 
There's a tidal wave coming. And not just against the Dems. The anti incumbent feeling now is stronger than in 2010. People are plain fed up and will vote the rascals out. The Dems will initially glory in seeing McConnell etc defeated. Only to gripe when the TP candidates oust Dems.

The TP candidates are only a serious threat to Republicans at present because the TP is clustered on the extreme right.

So, wanting this government cut down to size and not being tax anymore to take care of them and their every whim, Is Extreme?

I find that simply amazing anyone in this country can say that.
 
There's a tidal wave coming. And not just against the Dems. The anti incumbent feeling now is stronger than in 2010. People are plain fed up and will vote the rascals out. The Dems will initially glory in seeing McConnell etc defeated. Only to gripe when the TP candidates oust Dems.

The TP candidates are only a serious threat to Republicans at present because the TP is clustered on the extreme right.

So, wanting this government cut down to size and not being tax anymore to take care of them and their every whim, Is Extreme?

I find that simply amazing anyone in this country can say that.

Is We the People want to live in a civilized society, then We the People need to make sure that there are jobs with benefits for every hardworking American. If that requires raising taxes because the "job creators" reneged on their side of the "taxcut" deal then sobeit. Holding them accountable for their failure is what genuine conservatives do.
 
The TP candidates are only a serious threat to Republicans at present because the TP is clustered on the extreme right.

So, wanting this government cut down to size and not being tax anymore to take care of them and their every whim, Is Extreme?

I find that simply amazing anyone in this country can say that.

Is We the People want to live in a civilized society, then We the People need to make sure that there are jobs with benefits for every hardworking American. If that requires raising taxes because the "job creators" reneged on their side of the "taxcut" deal then sobeit. Holding them accountable for their failure is what genuine conservatives do.

Is Greece a civilized society?
 
So, wanting this government cut down to size and not being tax anymore to take care of them and their every whim, Is Extreme?

I find that simply amazing anyone in this country can say that.

Is We the People want to live in a civilized society, then We the People need to make sure that there are jobs with benefits for every hardworking American. If that requires raising taxes because the "job creators" reneged on their side of the "taxcut" deal then sobeit. Holding them accountable for their failure is what genuine conservatives do.

Is Greece a civilized society?

Is Greece the 51st state?
 
Here is the response I mailed to Mr. Speaker of the House..




Mr. Speaker...

I understand that you are tired of those of us who voted for many of those in the House and Senate who are more Conservative than you are and are tired of the political games that being played with our lives and the future of this country.

I understand that you want us to "get along" with the Democrats who have been attempting to socialize this country and have been all about transforming it from the principles under which it was founded to something more along what Marx or Lenin would have wanted to see.

I understand that you no longer want to deal with us.

I am not going to go into the rant that you are assuming that I am going to go into.. I have some simple questions to ask you.

When did the Democrats work with us?

1 -Affordable Healthcare Act .... Do you remember how that got passed and the willingness of the Democrats to compromise with Republicans? I remember bribes, I remember kickbacks, I remember exemptions, I remember bills being gutted by the Senate after passing the House then replaced with the ACA and passed under rules that didn't apply. I remember Democrats locking Republicans out of meetings. I don't remember any compromises by the Democrats.

2 - Illegal immigration. When was the last time the Democrats have done anything to actually secure our borders? They want amnesty, but they won't secure the borders. Remember Pelosi's first year as Speaker when she defunded the border fence?
Where has the Democrats worked with Republicans on immigration besides demanding they get their way?

3 - Securing the Voting Booth - Have the Democrats ever done anything to secure the voting booth to ensure only Citizens who can legally vote cast ballot? I can't think of a single bill they voted for that would do that.

4 - Exactly how many Democrats have been trying to take away our 2nd Amendment Rights for the past 30 years?


You are willing to turn on the people who have voted in people to represent them that also voted to make you Speaker of the House in order to work with Democrats who have not worked with the Republican party on any bill of importance to Republicans. You are calling them "Crazy".

Have you succumbed to the pressure by the Media? Do you honestly think ABC, NBC, CBS, or CNN are unbiased in their representations of the members of the Tea Party? Remember the Left is so scared of them that they sent the IRS after them. It is not unreasonable to say that thanks to the efforts of the IRS in preventing so many groups from forming, that gave Obama his 2nd term.

Mr. Speaker. You really should start enjoying that title for now. Or did you prefer being called "The House Minority Leader" more. You may get your chance to be the "House Minority Leader" again in 2015 after all the "Crazy" Tea Party people in America stayed home and didn't vote and the House reverts back to Democrat control.

How would you like that? All three branches under control of the Democrats for Obama's last 2 years in office.



You should have learned, in that bar you worked in, that you dance with the people who brought you to the dance instead.

Boehner to Shroom: the TeaP got its butt kicked. If you want to be in our caucus in the House, you will do it our way. You TeaPs have been told a long time now this would happen if you did not grow up.
 
We can all whine all we want.

We can work to fire who we want to fire and keep who we want to keep.

If we are in the majority.....we will get what we want.

If not, we'll have to work harder.

What is so encouraging is that the GOP is a f**cked up mess. And yet, they still own the house (two years after Chris Matthews and the rest of the kitty cats on MSNBC were coughing up furballs on how the GOP was dead)....

Imagine what we could do if we got our act together !!!
 
Boehner is right to lash out at them. The deal is great.

We get back some of the spending that should have always been in place, and we have revenue increases with the new name "fee" to help the GOP get past their oafish rank & file. :lol:

This is mostly a win for the Dems. Obama is going to go down as one of America's greatest Presidents.


Not a good deal but IMO the main impetus is to get another shutdown off the table so ALL the media/public focus will be on the implosion of Obamacare, leading up to the 2014 midterms.

Just clearing the table for the Dem Saughter of November 2014. BO thought 2010 was a shellacking? Just wait...
 
Boehner sees his power and his ambitions slipping away. The republican public is not interested in going along to get along as it used to be.
 
Boehner sees his power and his ambitions slipping away. The republican public is not interested in going along to get along as it used to be.

Yep, I for one am fed up with all of them

They are now changing the rules to please themselves and the President, dictating how they are going to follow our laws, take OscamCare for an example

People need to get more involved or they will continue rolling over us
 
Is We the People want to live in a civilized society, then We the People need to make sure that there are jobs with benefits for every hardworking American. If that requires raising taxes because the "job creators" reneged on their side of the "taxcut" deal then sobeit. Holding them accountable for their failure is what genuine conservatives do.

Is Greece a civilized society?

Is Greece the 51st state?

Was that supposed to be a response?
You posited that civilized countries provide jobs with benefits and some level of guaranteed survival. So I ask whether Greece, which does exactly that, is a civilized country.
 
Is Greece a civilized society?

Is Greece the 51st state?

Was that supposed to be a response?
You posited that civilized countries provide jobs with benefits and some level of guaranteed survival. So I ask whether Greece, which does exactly that, is a civilized country.

Once again your reading comprehension disorder is on display. I was referring to the US as a civilized SOCIETY. Your DEFLECTION to Greece is the aberration.
 
Is Greece the 51st state?

Was that supposed to be a response?
You posited that civilized countries provide jobs with benefits and some level of guaranteed survival. So I ask whether Greece, which does exactly that, is a civilized country.

Once again your reading comprehension disorder is on display. I was referring to the US as a civilized SOCIETY. Your DEFLECTION to Greece is the aberration.

A deflection cannot be an aberration. Your English is poor. As is your reasoning.
Why is it civilized to promote policies that keep people in poverty?
 
Was that supposed to be a response?
You posited that civilized countries provide jobs with benefits and some level of guaranteed survival. So I ask whether Greece, which does exactly that, is a civilized country.

Once again your reading comprehension disorder is on display. I was referring to the US as a civilized SOCIETY. Your DEFLECTION to Greece is the aberration.

A deflection cannot be an aberration. Your English is poor.

Ironic!

aberration - definition of aberration by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

ab·er·ra·tion (b-rshn)
n.
1. A deviation from the proper or expected course. See Synonyms at deviation.

As is your reasoning.
Why is it civilized to promote policies that keep people in poverty?

More irony!

Are you now alleging that jobs with benefits "promote policies that keep people in poverty"?
 
holb_c11407720131212120100.jpg
 
Once again your reading comprehension disorder is on display. I was referring to the US as a civilized SOCIETY. Your DEFLECTION to Greece is the aberration.

A deflection cannot be an aberration. Your English is poor.

Ironic!

aberration - definition of aberration by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

ab·er·ra·tion (b-rshn)
n.
1. A deviation from the proper or expected course. See Synonyms at deviation.

As is your reasoning.
Why is it civilized to promote policies that keep people in poverty?

More irony!

Are you now alleging that jobs with benefits "promote policies that keep people in poverty"?

Yeah, a little knowledge is an absurd thing. Your use of "aberration" is incorrect. English must not be your first languatge. Or you're a gross illiterate.
I am alleging that mandating a level of benefits and salary destroys jobs and thus keeps people in poverty. Doubtless that is too hard to grasp for someone who's native language is Kurdish.
 
Last edited:
A deflection cannot be an aberration. Your English is poor.

Ironic!

aberration - definition of aberration by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.



As is your reasoning.
Why is it civilized to promote policies that keep people in poverty?

More irony!

Are you now alleging that jobs with benefits "promote policies that keep people in poverty"?

Yeah, a little knowledge is an absurd thing. Your use of "aberration" is incorrect. English must not be your first languatge. Or you're a gross illiterate.
I am alleging that mandating a level of benefits and salary destroys jobs and thus keeps people in poverty. Doubtless that is too hard to grasp for someone who's native language is Kurdish.

Your reading comprehension disorder is worsening. A deflection is a deviation from the subject matter and hence it can be defined as an aberration.

Furthermore you have no evidence whatsoever that providing jobs with benefits "destroys jobs and thus keeps people in poverty". Until you can prove your allegation it will be given as much credence as the Republican fallacy that giving tax cuts to "job creators" creates jobs.
 
Ironic!

aberration - definition of aberration by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.





More irony!

Are you now alleging that jobs with benefits "promote policies that keep people in poverty"?

Yeah, a little knowledge is an absurd thing. Your use of "aberration" is incorrect. English must not be your first languatge. Or you're a gross illiterate.
I am alleging that mandating a level of benefits and salary destroys jobs and thus keeps people in poverty. Doubtless that is too hard to grasp for someone who's native language is Kurdish.

Your reading comprehension disorder is worsening. A deflection is a deviation from the subject matter and hence it can be defined as an aberration.

Furthermore you have no evidence whatsoever that providing jobs with benefits "destroys jobs and thus keeps people in poverty". Until you can prove your allegation it will be given as much credence as the Republican fallacy that giving tax cuts to "job creators" creates jobs.

Sorry. You cannot post a definition and assume you are correct because you've missed the nuances.

Greece proves that mandating benefits for jobs destroys them. Actually every place that mandates high levels of wages and benefits have experienced high structural unemployment.

Come back when you finish high school.
 
With Boner (intentional) Obama already has his claque in command in both houses. The risk in primarying out the RINOs is that Democrats may win in the general election in some districts.

So if a RINO is replaced by a Democrat then what's the difference.

Primarying those closet socialists does pose a risk but the downside is very small given that the worst that could happen is status quo by a different name.
 

Forum List

Back
Top