Black Panthers speak out: "Black people shouldn't be killing black people, under no circumstances,"

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Feb 22, 2013
51,081
30,016
2,605
Oregon
This is in Mississippi, they need to spread their message to Chicago and all other big cities.


Pro-Second Amendment New Black Panther Party speaks out against rising crime​



Mississippi leaders of the New Black Panther Party spoke out against black-on-black violence and the crime crisis gripping their community Tuesday.

"Black people shouldn't be killing black people, under no circumstances," member Steven Harris said during a press conference in Jackson, Mississippi. "You have to love your people."


 
That's right, they should be killing white folk.............er..............um.................or is that no folk?

LOL.

I wonder if that includes abortion where more blacks have been murdered by abortion than born in NYC.
 
This is in Mississippi, they need to spread their message to Chicago and all other big cities.


Pro-Second Amendment New Black Panther Party speaks out against rising crime​






But presumably back on white murder is ok with the sons of obama aka new black panthers
 
So, if this guy is the victim of a home invasion and the perps are black he should lay down his arms instead of defending himself?
 
Black identity and the negative aspects of militancy

As long as people see the black identity as a purely negative consequence of external oppression, this criticism of the pursuit of black autonomy may be justified. As a negative fact, black ethnicity is defined in opposition to the oppressor, the racial enemy. Louis Farrakhan, or militant rappers like Sister Souljah and Public Enemy represent this kind of thinking. They appear to accept the ultimately self-degrading view that the only thing black Americans have in common is their heritage of oppression. This naturally leads to the belief that the only reliable passion we share in common is hatred of the oppressor.

Hatred sustains two possible responses: avoidance or destruction of the hated object. So this negative view of the black ethnicity culminates in strategies that envisage violent conflict and, eventually, physical separation from “white dominated” American society. Of course, from a black viewpoint, both these outcomes are self-destructive delusions. If we define the enemy as nonblack American society, it is clearly an enemy blacks aren’t strong enough to defeat by violence. So the impulse stirred by the rhetoric of hate feeds black-on-black violence instead. Physical separation, even if it were possible, would most likely mean confinement to a racial ghetto with all the disadvantages of today’s predominately black urban centers, but no avenue of distraction or hope of eventual escape.

For all their seeming militancy, therefore, those who base their actions on the negative view of black ethnicity aren’t true militants at all. The most militant approach is the one that works, not one that leads to self-defeat and self-destruction. But the negative view of black ethnicity is not the only alternative.

In the course of this work, we have come to see the black moral identity as a positive reality, based on values that sustain both individual achievement and community cooperation. The idea of black autonomy need not, therefore, entail violence, or an effort to separate ourselves from “the enemy.” It can mean, instead, an effort to develop communities that reflect and preserve the moral character that emerged from black-American experience. In pursuing this goal, black Americans can act out of respect for ourselves, not hatred of others.

Alan Keyes, Masters of the Dream (1995), pp. 165-166
 
As if anyone gives a shit about the black Panthers.

Honestly I don't think blacks kill enough blacks. They need to up their game.
 

Forum List

Back
Top