well that's the thing, she didn't break the law, did she?Who did he hurt? No one.
I wonder if the border is actually someone's property or really no one's property. If it is no one's property then it is just an arbitrary decision.
i don't understand the question. he was arrested on the mexican side of the border after ignoring signs saying that bringing guns into mexico was illegal, that he was approaching the border, and then he chose to drive through a 'nothing to declare' lane.
so why should he get a pass for breaking the law because he once served in the military?
We had a co-worker who went to board a plane with a knife in her purse. Should she go to jail? We know her. She wouldn't do anything wrong. They let her go. She explained she walks home and there are a lot of pit bulls. Should a nice lady who never committed any crimes and who is non-violent go to jail because she forgot?
if i break a mexican law, yes, i believe i'll be held in a mexican jail.Have you ever done anything wrong?
How would you feel if there was a law for it?
Would you like to serve your sentence in a Mexico jail?
Is it the same as an American jail?
that wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. of course some people would call that a nanny state and say that we should be responsible for our own actions and choices.Are you in favor of having checkpoints before the border so Americans don't get in trouble? Why wasn't that right afforded to him?
well no. mexico has a presumption of guilt. so no, i wouldn't like to be accused of a crime there. and to that end i won't be driving across the border with my guns in the seat next to me - which is also a violation of california law.Do they have the same sense of justice and would you like to be judged by a different standard of justice?
if you are of the belief that military service alone means a person has good character i hate to be the one to tell you but you're wrong.No one is saying he shouldn't be exempt because he is a former marine but either being a marine tells his character or else the military is enlisting people who don't belong. Which one do you want to believe?
If everything was clear cut, why would we need attorneys? Why would we need to cross examine? Why don't we just send everyone to jail then?
well that's the thing. in this case it is clear cut. he broke the law. it may not have been his intent, and his lawyer will argue that he was ignorant and meant no harm, but as to whether or not he broke the law the answer is clear.
Last edited: