"Biden's documents are different from Trump's documents"

The 2nd batch of classified docs were found at Biden’s “storage space” at his Delaware home. For context, the FBI raided Trump for having classified docs in a *secure* room at Mar-a-Lago.
 
If those on the Left believed that Trump having classified documents was a jailable offense, doesn't that make Biden's actions an impeachable one? They made the rules. Let's play by them.
 
"People know I take classified documents and classified materials seriously," Biden says in response to discovery of second set of documents at his Wilmington, Del. home. "We're going to see all of this unfold, I'm confident," he said
 
If you're trying to defend Biden for taking classified documents with him, it's actually not a good defense whatsoever to say that the most criminal president in American history did the same thing, but worse.
 
The additional documents that Biden took with him were found in his home. His private residence.

Well, well, well. Orange man bad.

 
"People know I take classified documents and classified materials seriously," Biden says in response to discovery of second set of documents at his Wilmington, Del. home. "We're going to see all of this unfold, I'm confident," he said
The question is why were they there. Why is that so hard for demofks?
 

CNN: Biden Could Face Special Counsel, ‘Full-Blown Criminal Investigation’ as Second Batch of Classified Documents Found​


Whoa
If one is a Democrat and The Democrat Media Bubble Cult thinks this ------
 
Investigation was about 2012 matters, which was years before Hunter joined the board.

How could he possibly be part of that?

After Shokin was removed investigation again revamped against Burisma owner, there was nothing about Biden's son.

Nothing you say adds up, you just have your half-baked political conclusions you've come to believe for ignorant, stupid reasons.

If you were an honest thinker instead of stupid, reactive politico you would long ago realize that.

I guess you miss the point. It doesn't matter if they were investigating 2012 matters, the point was that Hunter was on the board, NOT coincidently, and the company most certainly did not want an investigation of any sort. It is hardly a stretch to think that Hunter's influence and his close relationship with "big guy", who could make things happen, played a part in Shokin being fired. According to Shokin, Mykola Zlochevsky, head of Burisma, hired Hunter to "protect himself". Again, hardly a stretch. What are the odds that the VP's son just happened to be hired by a Ukrainian company under investigation? Think about it. The investigation itself didn't involve Hunter, but the company for which he represented. Joe, as the VP of the US, openly threatening to withhold US taxpayer money from the Ukraine if Shokin wasn't fired to protect his son's lavish paycheck is the issue at hand. I might also add that the investigations stopped when Shokin was fired and Zlochevsky is now living abroad, free. The fix was in and Hunter profited immensely from his father's influence peddling.

Ukraine prosecutor says there are no plans to revisit Burisma probes

You are the one not thinking things through and letting your political bias cloud any reasonable judgement. Hunter is certainly no angel, was not qualified to be making 80k+ per month from 2014-2019 and he wasn't hired by Burisma by pure coincidence. You bought into a false narrative painted by the MSM that Shokin was not investigating Burisma. The fact as well as common sense don't align with that theory.
 
how does it work?

A Special Counsel is appointed to investigate if a crime is suspected. We're not at that point yet. We're at the point where a judge is reviewing to determine if a crime could have even been committed.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom