"Biden's documents are different from Trump's documents"

[The Original Tree]

It means the documents are still classified.

And yes, it's a crime because they're government records even if they're not classified at all.

 

[easyt65]

He had the classified documents since 2016 and never turned them over until a whistleblower reported it.

....but THEN he cooperated fully...

 

[The Original Tree]

....but THEN he cooperated fully...

When is Obama going to turn over his classified documents in the warehouse in Chicago?

 

[basquebromance]

 

[AntonToo]

What dishonesty? You agreed - Biden engaged in extortion, he extorted the former PM of Ukraine. To you (and Democrats) the readon somehow nakes it ok - 'the ends justify the means'.

Why are you so ashamed to just say Biden enaged in extortion, especially if you think his doing so was ok?

Thete was no dishonesty from me.

Dummy, your shameless dishonesty is in refusing to acknowledge that America leveraging with our aid to other countries to get them to address their corruption is GOOD FOREIGN POLICY.

You use the word extortion to try to frame in negative light America forcing Ukraine to remove a notoriously corrupt prosecutor. But it doesn't change the fact that Biden absolutely did the right thing to get him removed and Ukraine is better off for it.

Was Ukraine or America better off for Trump admin trying to get them to publicly investigate Trump's political opponent? Hell no, he was undermining our foreign policy and making us look like corrupt do-what-we-say-not-what-we-do assholes.

 

[scruffy]

Dummy, your shameless dishonesty is in refusing to acknowledge that America leveraging with our aid other countries to address their corruption is GOOD FOREIGN POLICY.

You use the word extortion to try to frame in negative light America forcing Ukraine to remove a notoriously corrupt prosecutor. But it doesn't change the fact that Biden absolutely did the right thing to get him removed and Ukraine is better off for it.

Was Ukraine or America better off for Trump trying to get them to publicly investigate Trump's political opponent? Hell no, he was undermining our foreign policy and making us look like corrupt do-what-we-say-not-what-we-do assholes.

Ukraine is at WAR, you fucking idiot.

 

[AntonToo]

Ukraine is at WAR, you fucking idiot.

Idiot, you seriously think Putin wouldn't want to grab Ukraine's territories if Shokin wasn't removed?

Ukraine wants to be part of Europe, not corrupt, repressive Russian world and it drives Russian rightwingers like Putin nuts.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[easyt65]

Dummy, your shameless dishonesty is in refusing to acknowledge that America leveraging with our aid to other countries to get them to address their corruption is GOOD FOREIGN POLICY.

It didn't hurt that it saved his criminal, Influence Peddling, crackhead son's ass.

 

[AntonToo]

It didn't hurt that it saved his criminal, Influence Peddling, crackhead son's ass.

That's just another of your insane lies.

Burisma investigation had to do with matters well before Hunter joining their board. Even Shokin stated that Hunter was never a subject of investigation.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Marener]

It didn't hurt that it saved his criminal, Influence Peddling, crackhead son's ass.

Still repeating the same tired lies.

This is why you’re a joke.

 

[basquebromance]

what does "batch" mean? is it 2 documents? is it 2,000 documents? why did they wait so long to tell us? who has access to the Biden center? who owns the building? there's tons of questions!

 

[struth]

It means the documents are still classified.

And yes, it's a crime because they're government records even if they're not classified at all.

wow not looking good for xiden

 

[easyt65]

That's just another of your insane lies.

Sorry, Charlie, but that has been undeniably proven.

 

[easyt65]

Still repeating the same tired lies.

This is why you’re a joke.

Feel free to try to debunk it, Democrat sac-licker.

 

[AntonToo]

Sorry, Charlie, but that has been undeniably proven.

Shokin said Hunter wasn't a subject of his investigation.

Is that true or not?

Do you have any capacity for honesty at all?

 

[Marener]

Feel free to try to debunk it, Democrat sac-licker.

It’s easy to debunk it to rational people.

It’s impossible to do so for you. You refuse to accept anything that you don’t want to believe.

That’s why you’re a joke.

 

[Independent thinker]

Madcow from MSNBC said they are soooo different, LOL!

Now they've found even more documents.

 

[easyt65]

Shokin said Hunter wasn't a subject of his investigation.

Hunter did not have to be the subject of the investigation to be discovered as being involved in the corruption and crime.

Do YOU have no honesty / shame or just filled with spin / deceit?