"Biden's documents are different from Trump's documents"

Hunter did not have to be the subject of the investigation to be discovered as being involved in the corruption and crime.
So Shokin was not investigating Hunter. You admit that.

So what's left of your accusation? A baseless assumption that even though he wasn't the one being investigated there would be something that would be found, though you aren't sure what.

Hunter was somehow guilty of something in Ukraine, you just know it.

Is that true or not?
 
Last edited:
The horse would know more about it than you.
I feel bad for people that decide to live in the right wing media bubble. The rest of the world must seem so scary.
 
I said I can easily debunk it, but I can’t make you listen.
Yeah, you already proved you can't debunk it ... by not debunking it.

:auiqs.jpg:

Go back to the kids' table...
 
So Shokin was not investigating Hunter. You admit that.

So what's left of your accusation? A baseless assumption that even though he wasn't the one being investigated there would be something that would be found.

Is that true or not?

I admit Hunter was not THE subject of the investigation, not that he wasn't part of the corruption / crime being investigated.
 
I admit Hunter was not THE subject of the investigation, not that he wasn't part of the corruption / crime being investigated.
Investigation was about 2012 matters, which was years before Hunter joined the board.

How could he possibly be part of that?

After Shokin was removed investigation again revamped against Burisma owner, there was nothing about Biden's son.

Nothing you say adds up, you just have your half-baked political conclusions you've come to believe for ignorant, stupid reasons.

If you were an honest thinker instead of stupid, reactive politico you would long ago realize that.
 
That’s some really terrible logic.

Which is exactly what I expected.
You have been weighed, you have been measured, you keep flapping your gums instead of debunking it, you're wasting everyone's time. I'll talk to you again when you debunk it....buh-bye, silly troll.
 
Investigation was about 2012 matters, which was years before Hunter joined the board.

How could he possibly be part of that possible crime?

After Shokin was removed investigation again revamped against Burisma owner, there was nothing about Biden's son.
laughing hilariously.webp



:itsok:
 
You have been weighed, you have been measured, you keep flapping your gums instead of debunking it, you're wasting everyone's time. I'll talk to you again when you debunk it....buh-bye, silly troll.
You’re wasting everyone’s time asking for something you’ll never listen to.
 
Hunter did not have to be the subject of the investigation to be discovered as being involved in the corruption and crime.

Do YOU have no honesty / shame or just filled with spin / deceit?

Shokin was involved in at least 2 cases involving Zlochevsky, spanning a two year period. In those two years, what did Shokin accomplish...?
 
I admit Hunter was not THE subject of the investigation, not that he wasn't part of the corruption / crime being investigated.

He wasn't part of the corruption. That corruption occurred before Hunter was hired.
 
Back
Top Bottom