Are you denying the argument at hand that natural immunity overrides and supersedes the current jabs? Are you aware that they should’ve targeted T cells instead of memory B cells, incorrectly going with a specific section of spike led to no chance for a creation of a true vaccine for this virus?
Do you think any study can come out now and go against the current dialogue? Not hardly. One American journal already added a new layer of screening prior to pre-prints so they would not be peer reviewed. The following source explains how funding is also biased and has been for years before the 5th coronavirus became an issue.
www.science.org
Do you know why the current virus was labeled COVID-19 when it is actually SARS2? The hype - they knew the public would freak more with a novel respiratory virus that sounded more dangerous than strictly labeling it, as it should have been, SARS2.
Do you realize NIH (National Institutes of Health- US govt health overseer)wants no part of what is being revealed? NIH and Dr. Fauci have messed up again. The connections to the same Wuhan bat lab and EcoHealth yet again as the grantee ( jump back 17 years) and another suspected coverup- same players! Good grief, big money surely can hide the facts.
“Compared with nAbs, SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cells are maintained for a relatively long time (Table
1). A recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2-specific memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses are sustained in COVID-19 convalescent individuals for 10 months regardless of disease severity
8. The persistence of memory T cell responses to SARS-CoV for 17 years has been demonstrated
9. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 VOCs rarely escape memory T cell responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.”
This Comment article proposes that T cell-oriented vaccine strategies should be considered to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the longer term, given declining levels of neutralizing antibodies with time after vaccination or infection and the emergence of viral escape variants.
www.nature.com
If you say I read anything on Facebook or I must read lowly media sources you’d be wrong again.
My links are for all interested readers, and you can deny them F&B until your face turns red. In today’s world it takes more effort to uncover the truth. This should’ve never been a political issue.
Produce your studies that oppose this position. Here are a few good sources: Science,org., Science Magazine, Science Daily, Nature, NatureAsia, and Pubmed. Pubmed is a mixed bag depending on if they needed NIH funding.