Biden DOJ Sides with Porn Industry's Lawsuit Against Texas's Age Verification Law

Okay, since children can still access and shoot guns, why do we prevent them from purchasing guns? Should not the responsibility lie solely with the parents and guns be sold to anyone with a clean background check and the money to buy them?

Yep, absolutely.
 
The problem is these laws violate the First Amendment.

Here's the thing. I grew up in the 1970's. We didn't have the internet, but we did have Playboy and Penthouse and Hustler.

And we had no problem getting ahold of them as kids, usually after the adults threw them away.

Kids today are much more clever. Here's how you get around the Texas law. You sign up for a VPN service, put your identity in another country, and for 4.99 a month, you can watch all the penetration you want.

I think we all know there's a huge difference in the harm done to kids flipping through nudie mags from back in the day and the type of porn accessible online.
 
So you support abolishing any restrictions/laws on adult industry, the government should also say out of gun ownership, it obviously doesn't, work, the 'bad guys' still get guns. Glad we can agree on government overreach that curtails our constitutional rights.

Great, so why the argument?


The government should also abolish all welfare or financial aid, it's none of their business if a family isn't financially stable, and they shouldn't be taking money from one citizen to give to another.

I can go on and on...

I'm good with ending it all if we indeed ended it all. No more bail outs, no ,more pumping of the markets. Etc.
 
Why do you frame the idea of being against a nanny state as being left? You also believe "It takes a village" like Mac does?

Not at all, I'm just saying that I don't see you advocate this same principle across the board, if you do, then great. We agree.
 
With camera's on their phones, kids can and do produce their own. How far of a nanny state do you want to take this?

We could always make minors wear masks will they’re watching porn.
 
When a 12-year old child goes into the 7-11 and tries to buy cigarettes will you sell it to them unless the parent is there to stop you?
The comparison fails because you can’t walk into the internet. It has to be provided to you by, get this, a parent.
 
It's on the behalf of the 1st Amendment.
We already have parental notifications and access restrictions baked into the entertainment industry that have passed constitutional muster. Next.
 
Not at all, I'm just saying that I don't see you advocate this same principle across the board, if you do, then great. We agree.

Is there some area where I am hypocritical? Maybe, I suppose it's possible. If you can point it out I would try and explain. If not, I have no idea why you felt a need to disagree with me when you seem to be agreeing with me.
 
The comparison fails because you can’t walk into the internet. It has to be provided to you by, get this, a parent.
Unless, of course, the child is not using their parents' internet. If he is using the state provided one at school, for example.
 
Great, so why the argument?




I'm good with ending it all if we indeed ended it all. No more bail outs, no ,more pumping of the markets. Etc.

I expect to see you in the next gun debate thread insisting that all gun laws be abolished. :dunno:
 
We already have parental notifications and access restrictions baked into the entertainment industry that have passed constitutional muster. Next.

These restrictions were already shot down by the Supreme Court.
 
Unfortunately many of the performers in the adult industry have died from suicide or disease. Condoms are seldom used.
 
Unless, of course, the child is not using their parents' internet. If he is using the state provided one at school, for example.
Schools already have filters on their networks, unless they’re completely incompetent.

I guess it is Texas, where the bar is extremely low.
 
First, I agree that kids or adults that want to get around this will have no problem doing so. I’m no hacker but just off the top of my head I thought wouldn’t a VPN easily overcome this?

But still… Why are my hard earned tax dollars paying paid DOJ lawyers to file a brief on behalf of the porn industry? I’m guessing the porn industry has more money than they know what to do with. They can hire far better lawyers that are willing to work for a government check.

Doesn’t our government have more important things to do? I wonder why they would pause their frenzy of destroying evidence before Trump’s people take over long enough to help free speech advocates at porn hamster.com or whoever ?

My guess is that a nice little wire transfer landed in the overseas account of one of Hunter Biden’s numerous shell corporations.
Yes, a vpn will get around it.

So, you've been watching hamster porn. Must be exciting.
 
Is there some area where I am hypocritical? Maybe, I suppose it's possible. If you can point it out I would try and explain. If not, I have no idea why you felt a need to disagree with me when you seem to be agreeing with me.

I'm sure I'll see you in the next gun debate thread advocating for all gun laws to be abolished, can't wait.
 
I expect to see you in the next gun debate thread insisting that all gun laws be abolished. :dunno:

I have. I said there should be NO restrictions on the people. I noted earlier today the guy arrested for building bombs should be released.

Now why did you feel a need to argue I was wrong when actually agreeing with me?
 
15th post
You mean your hysteria over drags queens and trans people????

Children are banned from drag shows, where no child has ever been assaulted or attacked, but encouraged to go to church, Boy Scouts, and kids sports programs.

No drag queen or tranny has EVER been convicted in the USA of molesting a child, but 20% of all convicted pedophiles are members of the clergy, or child youth leaders.

You keep taking your kids to church, and do NOTHING to protect your kids from pedophiles there.
we
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0583.webp
    IMG_0583.webp
    91.9 KB · Views: 11
The comparison fails because you can’t walk into the internet. It has to be provided to you by, get this, a parent.
Wrong

The internet is available free throughout society
 
I have. I said there should be NO restrictions on the people. I noted earlier today the guy arrested for building bombs should be released.

Now why did you feel a need to argue I was wrong when actually agreeing with me?

I don't recall seeing you advocate this same principle elsewhere, I look forward to seeing it happen in the future though.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom