Biden document discovery is proof Dems ‘overplayed their hand’ on Trump

[berg80]

But there wasn't any such video. That's the point you keep dodging - the Democrats have NEVER had any evidence on Trump for the last 6 years!

You mean besides Trump paying a fine and being forced to shut down his "charitable" foundation because he stole from it? BTW, have you read the 1/6 committee report? Have you considered the Orange Insurrectionist would have been convicted in both impeachments based on the evidence had the jury not been partially comprised of hopelessly biased and ethically compromised Repub senators?

 

[JoeB131]

No? Maybe she was polishing that knob when they had bin Laden in their sights, and 3,000 died dummy…

Okay, let's look at that one. At the time that Ken Star was questioning Clinton about blow jobs, Clinton and his team were planning and launching attacks on Al Qaeda Targets in Afghanistan and Sudan.

And the Republican response was to call it a "Wag the Dog*" attack and mock the facility in Sudan as an "Aspirin Factory" (even though it was in fact producing nerve gas for Al Qaeda)

* Note,= The term Wag the Dog comes from a 1997 film starring Robert DeNiro and the late Anne Heche where a fake war is made up to cover up for a sexual scandal.

So it seems to me that Bill was taking Bin Laden seriously.

Meanwhile, Bush got a briefing from the CIA a month before 9/11, which specifically mentioned aircraft hijackings as a possibility, and his response was, "Well, you covered your ass" and went fishing.

Remember Bushâs Vacation

The 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks is a reminder of the Bush administration’s many missteps, writes Eric Alterman.

www.americanprogress.org

 

[easyt65]

I expect the Republicans to have at least a sense of self-preservation. What happens when the next mob shows up and the Capitol Police decide they aren't going to die protecting these fools?

Doubt the FBI and Democrats will ever set up such a situation again.

 

[JoeB131]

Feinstein was busted harboring a Chinese spy on her inner staff for decades.

Fang Fang Swalwell was caught screwing and taking money from a Chinese spy.

Hey, have you seen a picture of Christine Fang? Damn, I'd tap that in a heartbeat. Respect!!!

 

[JoeB131]

Doubt the FBI and Democrats will ever set up such a situation again.

Right. Funny, I thought it was Trump riling up the crazies for three months telling them that the election he lost by 8 million votes was stolen and they all needed to come to Washington.

 

[berg80]

Feinstein was busted harboring a Chinese spy on her inner staff for decades.

Fang Fang Swalwell was caught screwing and taking money from a Chinese spy.

Joe Biden.left TS/SCI documents unattended for 5 years in his personal / private office in Penn-Biden-ChiCom Center.

Feinstein, Pelosi, Swalwell, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and more have all been proven to have taken money from China.

You are either very stupid or gaslighting. Either way you have proven unworthy of wasting time on / carrying on a conversation with.

I am saddened to see someone who I'm sure at one time was a critically thinking person, open to questioning his own beliefs, become a mindless, drooling sycophant. Parroting right wing media memes out of a reflexive hatred driven by lies and disinformation spewed by a cohort twisting you in knots for profit.

 

[berg80]

~~~~~~
There's other questions bein asked:
Why weren't those documents just burned up? Why not avoid the scandal that has now been reinforced by a second find of such documents, this time in a garage at Biden's home in Wilmington? Who made these decisions?
Biden is not an honest man when it comes to political issues. He is not a stranger to covering things up.
The decision to let this out, to not cover it up, is so far unexplained. The whole thing can only hurt Biden. It also disables the Democrats of using Trump's withholding of classified papers as a weapon against him.
Was it the very special content of the classified documents that made this move necessary? Or is there something else that we do not yet know about? Something that led to the judgment that the current limit hangout of some dirty linen is better than to have a real scandal come to the public's knowledge.
See: MoA - Why Didn't Biden Just Burn Those Classified Documents?

It's called hubris.

If Joe knew the docs were at his old office why would he have left them there? Why would he have had his attorneys clearing out the office without letting them know the docs were there?

Isn't it possible the reporting on the story is true? He didn't know there were there, they were found as the office was being vacated, they were turned over to the NARA, once they were discovered searches of other locations that might have had docs stored there was initiated, other docs were found.

Could it be that you don't want to accept this completely plausible story line because you want Biden's circumstances to be as bad as Trump's?

 

[easyt65]

Okay, let's look at that one. At the time that Ken Star was questioning Clinton about blow jobs, Clinton and his team were planning and launching attacks on Al Qaeda Targets in Afghanistan and Sudan.

We can stop your little misleading narrative here.

You snowflakes have been defending the pedophile for far too long, lying about why Clinton was Impeached, claiming it was over his affair with Lewinski.

You keep dodging the fact that the sexual predator sexually harrassed, sexually assaulted, and raped numerous women over his career, but the one that did him in made history.

Clinton, a sitting US President, was sued taken to court, and was forced to testify in his own defense for sexually harassing a woman. Itbahat trial the Arkansas Lawyer lied and was SO deceitful / misleading the Judge found Slick Willy in Contempt of Court and stripped him of his license to practice law in Arkansas temporarily.

President Clinton was found to have attempted to deny an American citizen of her right to a fair trial, and he was punished by a Judge for his deceit. He was Impeached because he attempted to deny the very same Constitutional rights e swore an oath to protect.

Also, he also destroyed his credibility and cemented his reputation of being a perv, sexual predator and liar...unacceptable for a US President.

As for your point about him PLANNING to strike targets in Afghanistan ... he blew up a MILK FACTORY.




Since you were being every bit as deceitful as Slick Willy, there was no reason to continue reading your crap.

 

[j-mac]

Okay, let's look at that one. At the time that Ken Star was questioning Clinton about blow jobs, Clinton and his team were planning and launching attacks on Al Qaeda Targets in Afghanistan and Sudan.

And the Republican response was to call it a "Wag the Dog*" attack and mock the facility in Sudan as an "Aspirin Factory" (even though it was in fact producing nerve gas for Al Qaeda)

* Note,= The term Wag the Dog comes from a 1997 film starring Robert DeNiro and the late Anne Heche where a fake war is made up to cover up for a sexual scandal.

So it seems to me that Bill was taking Bin Laden seriously.

Meanwhile, Bush got a briefing from the CIA a month before 9/11, which specifically mentioned aircraft hijackings as a possibility, and his response was, "Well, you covered your ass" and went fishing.

Remember Bushâs Vacation

The 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks is a reminder of the Bush administration’s many missteps, writes Eric Alterman.

www.americanprogress.org

Your revision won't work....

"Former president Bill Clinton signed an order in August 1998 preventing the CIA from organizing a kill operation against al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, according to a new documentary.

The revelation is discussed by former CIA station chief Bob Grenier in the new Showtime documentary The Longest War, which was released Tuesday. Grenier, who was based in Islamabad, Pakistan, explained that the agency was permitted to engage in “lethal activity” against the terrorist leader but could not perform a strike with the explicit purpose of killing him under the terms of the Memorandum of Notification enacted by Clinton."

Bill Clinton blocked the CIA from killing Osama bin Laden, former station chief says

'If President Clinton had taken action and killed Osama bin Laden, there wouldn’t have been a 9/11,' said Marty Martin, a former CIA counterterrorism officer

nationalpost.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/16/bill-clinton-and-the-missed-opportunities-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/

 

[pknopp]

What we can take from this, is the fact that the government is not serious and the people should quit treating it like it is.

They do whatever they want and hold no one accountable for anything. Lie under oath? Meh, whatever.

Leave classified documents laying all around? Why have them to start with?

Rob, steal and cheat? They are just rewarding themselves for "working for the people".

It's odd to me that we still support all of this.

 

[easyt65]

Right. Funny, I thought...

You should have stopped right there - you attempting to think without looking at all the facts was your 1st mistake.

The bottom line on J6, the FACT that you sbowflakes keep intentionally ducking and denying, is this:

Had Pelosi, Schumer, Raskin,etc... called on the National Guard when they had the chance ... had they even authorized / provided the fencing that had been used successfully before in ptotecting the USSC building, J6 WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED.

If the FBI had focused on preventing J6 and protecting the Capitol instead of spending months preparing, planning, recruiting,and carrying out numerous 'Entrapment Scheme' Operations (which they testified and admitted to) against US citizens, had not incited violence and breeching the Capitol the night before and on J6, J6 WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!

 

[pknopp]

You should have stopped right there - you attempting to think without looking at all the facts was your 1st mistake.

The bottom line on J6, the FACT that you sbowflakes keep intentionally ducking and denying, is this:

Had Pelosi, Schumer, Raskin,etc... called on the National Guard when they had the chance ... had they even authorized / provided the fencing that had been used successfully before in ptotecting the USSC building, J6 WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED.

If the FBI had focused on preventing J6 and protecting the Capitol instead of spending months preparing, planning, recruiting,and carrying out numerous 'Entrapment Scheme' Operations (which they testified and admitted to) against US citizens, had not incited violence and breeching the Capitol the night before and on J6, J6 WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!

If not for poor losers, none of that is needed. Odd we never needed it before.

 

[j-mac]

What we can take from this, is the fact that the government is not serious and the people should quit treating it like it is.

They do whatever they want and hold no one accountable for anything. Lie under oath? Meh, whatever.

Leave classified documents laying all around? Why have them to start with?

Rob, steal and cheat? They are just rewarding themselves for "working for the people".

It's odd to me that we still support all of this.

I heard somewhere that there are over a Billion classified documents....Sounds to me like when a party wants to rid themselves of one of their own, that's the way to do it....

 

[easyt65]

Hey, have you seen a picture of Christine Fang? Damn, I'd tap that in a heartbeat. Respect!!!

Thank you for admitting you are actraitor, or at least support a traitor.

As a new member if Congress, Swalwell was briefed on the Chinese espionage tactic called the 'Honey Trap'. He already knew all about this, though. It is already documented how he met Fang Fang while he was running for office, took money from her / China to help his campaign, and was banging Fan Fang before he was elected.

Speaking of another proven traitor - Pelosi was briefed on Swalwell's connection to China through Dang Dang; yet, she STILL put him on and kept him on rhe House Intel Committee where he would have access to some of the nation's top secrets.

 

[jknowgood]

Yet neither Trump nor his attorneys have produced evidence the docs in Don's possession were declassified. As a matter of fact when asked to do so by the presiding judge Don's attorneys flatly refused to do so.

If they couldn't prove it, he would be in jail. You still wanting Trump to go to prison for that? Well if you do, you will have to sacrifice Biden for it. You want to do that?

 

[Blaster]

Except he didn't, did he?

He claims he did.

 

[Blaster]

 

[berg80]

Biden has been breaking the law the last 6 years...whe sending his corrupt / criminal DOJ & FBI on an unprecedented, unwarranted raid of Mara Lago

So you're saying the magistrate judge should not have authorized a search of MAL after Trump had resisted returning classified docs for months as well as lying about having returned all of them?

 

[berg80]

Also, he also destroyed his credibility and cemented his reputation of being a perv, sexual predator and liar...unacceptable for a US President.

Wait.........you're talking about Trump, right?

 

[JoeB131]

We can stop your little misleading narrative here.

You snowflakes have been defending the pedophile for far too long, lying about why Clinton was Impeached, claiming it was over his affair with Lewinski.

You keep dodging the fact that the sexual predator sexually harrassed, sexually assaulted, and raped numerous women over his career, but the one that did him in made history.

And if they had evidence of that, and impeached him for that, I'd be right with you.
They didn't.
They impeached him over lying about a consensual affair with an intern who was the sexual aggressor and had a thing for older, married men.
And half the fucking hypocrites leading the charge like Gingrich, Hyde and Livingstone, were all cheating on their spouses.

Clinton, a sitting US President, was sued taken to court, and was forced to testify in his own defense for sexually harassing a woman. Itbahat trial the Arkansas Lawyer lied and was SO deceitful / misleading the Judge found Slick Willy in Contempt of Court and stripped him of his license to practice law in Arkansas temporarily.

President Clinton was found to have attempted to deny an American citizen of her right to a fair trial, and he was punished by a Judge for his deceit. He was Impeached because he attempted to deny the very same Constitutional rights e swore an oath to protect.

Uh, Lawyers lie. That's what they do for a living. Duh.

That same judge found that Paula Jones had no case, because Clinton wasn't her supervisor and she suffered no adverse consequences from refusing his pass.

The bottom line on J6, the FACT that you sbowflakes keep intentionally ducking and denying, is this:

Had Pelosi, Schumer, Raskin,etc... called on the National Guard when they had the chance ... had they even authorized / provided the fencing that had been used successfully before in ptotecting the USSC building, J6 WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED.

Why should she had called out the National Guard (which by the way, they don't have the authority to do. Congress is nowhere in the Chain of Command). We have had this process take place 55 times previously, and no one had to call out the National Guard for Congress to certify the electoral vote. It's just something that happened.

The fact that there was an angry mob that tried to storm Congress falls entirely on Trump.

Thank you for admitting you are actraitor, or at least support a traitor.

As a new member if Congress, Swalwell was briefed on the Chinese espionage tactic called the 'Honey Trap'. He already knew all about this, though. It is already documented how he met Fang Fang while he was running for office, took money from her / China to help his campaign, and was banging Fan Fang before he was elected.

And I'm sure you've heard things about sideways pussies.