Biden considering "preemptive pardons" for those targeted for revenge

[Mac-7]

Because they don't to have to hire lawyers and be dragged through the legal mud.

Obviously.

You mean the way trump appointees and associates were?

 

[NetJedi]

Why would anyone accept a pardon if they did not commit a crime(s)?

No politician in their right mind would even if they did commit yet to be uncovered crimes, it's tantamount to an admission of guilt and they have voters to answer to; in politics perception is reality.

However, Washington is chock full of soulless bureaucrats, NGO functionaries and other assorted miscreants that would have no qualms about accepting a blanket pardon since they're not answerable to the voters.

 

[struth]

I do love irony.

what's the irony? Only one party in my lifetime, maybe in the history of the United States, has even discussed giving themselves blanket immunity before leaving office.

That's your party, in this thread, that you started.

 

[Curried Goats]

Because they don't to have to hire lawyers and be dragged through the legal mud.

Obviously.

So they should play politics with the criminal justice system for their own person convenience?

 

[Curried Goats]

what's the irony? Only one party in my lifetime, maybe in the history of the United States, has even discussed giving themselves blanket immunity before leaving office.

That's your party, in this thread, that you started.

Dipshit, your Republican majority on the Supreme Court just gave every President blanket immunity for their official acts after the man you voted for asked them for it.

 

[struth]

Dipshit, your Republican majority on the Supreme Court just gave every President blanket immunity for their official acts after the man you voted for asked them for it.

The President has always had criminal libility immunity for official acts. That's not the same as giving everyone in his staff a blanket pardon

Are you really that dumb?

and the Justices on the SCOTUS aren't elected, and don't run for office through a political party.

Yes, Trump had to fight his case to the SCOTUS, because NEVER in the history of the United States has one party engaged in political prosecutions before your demafacist regime

 

[Marener]

There was a dying person on the “captured land” who needed medical attention, and the occupiers didn’t allow the ambulance through. And the man died. They should have been charged with 2nd degree murder.

(In fact, now that I think about it, why weren’t all the leftists protesting these people occupying American land? Oh riiiiight…..they weren’t Jews.)

That’s not actually true, just a right wing narrative.

The ambulance refused to come to the victim, despite the people pleading for them. The ambulance was waiting for the police.
A few blocks away the police were waiting for the ambulance.

They weren’t communicating with each other.

The first responders screwed up and after 15 minutes, the people took the victim to the hospital themselves.

Seattle police claimed protesters blocked way to dying man. In fact, miscommunication with Seattle Fire was problem

Shots went off at 2:19 a.m. on a Saturday evening last month in the CHOP, the Capitol Hill Organized Protest zone.

www.kuow.org

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

They can't all move to Canada, EU..... I know for a fact the EU court system would laugh Trump DOJ evidence out of court. Ireland doesn't have partisan judges like that, judges are picked by the legal profession and rubber stamped by politics...

This would cause big issues with the DOJ and the American ambassador would be politely told to cop the fuck on... You ain't playing in a corrupt system like Judge Cannon's court...

Funny stuff.

 

[Curried Goats]

The President has always had criminal libility immunity for official acts. That's not the same as giving everyone in his staff a blanket pardon

Are you really that dumb?

and the Justices on the SCOTUS aren't elected, and don't run for office through a political party.

Yes, Trump had to fight his case to the SCOTUS, because NEVER in the history of the United States has one party engaged in political prosecutions before your demafacist regime

If they already had it then Trump wouldn't of had to ask the Supreme Court to settle it for him. You're happy with immunity and escaping justice when it's your guy.

 

[Zincwarrior]

My opinion helped elect trump

Which you were powerless to stop with a fencepost stuck up your ass

Thats not nurturing. In your world only MAGA supporters can opine on this board now?

 

[struth]

If they already had it then Trump wouldn't of had to ask the Supreme Court to settle it for him. You're happy with immunity and escaping justice when it's your guy.

He had to ask for it, because in NO TIME in our history had we had one party (the demafacsit) engaged in political prosecutions.

By your stupid logic, we have never had a 4th amendment, because defendants have to ask the Courts to suppress evidence. Of course we have it, and had it, it's just at times defendants have to litigated it because the Govt violates it.

Just like we never had to litigate the fact that a President can't be prosecuted for their official acts, because we never had one party political prosecute the other for their official acts in office.

 

[Lesh]

Mac1958 failed to answer the question of why worry if former obama/biden junta members have done nothing wrong?

One reason is that it is enormously expensive to defend yourself against spurious charges

 

[Rawley]

It's a damn shame it has come to this, but it's a good idea.

If this were done, the incoming administration would be able to more fully focus on destroying our critical institutions and leaving millions of Americans in the lurch in the name of its narcissistic, paranoid, authoritarian ideology.

Your pain brings us joy!

 

[Curried Goats]

He had to ask for it, because in NO TIME in our history had we had one party (the demafacsit) engaged in political prosecutions.

By your stupid logic, we have never had a 4th amendment, because defendants have to ask the Courts to suppress evidence. Of course we have it, and had it, it's just at times defendants have to litigated it because the Govt violates it.

Just like we never had to litigate the fact that a President can't be prosecuted for their official acts, because we never had one party political prosecute the other for their official acts in office.

They weren't political prosecutions. They were criminal prosecutions of a corrupt politician. Your feelings don't dictate reality.

 

[Zincwarrior]

One reason is that it is enormously expensive to defend yourself auspicious charges

And inauspicious ones!

 

[Lesh]

Your pain brings us joy!

That makes you shit

 

[Lesh]

And inauspicious ones!

Spell check goes wild sometimes

 

[Rawley]

That makes you shit

Thanks Your pain brings us particular joy.

 

[Frankenstein]

It's a damn shame it has come to this, but it's a good idea.

If this were done, the incoming administration would be able to more fully focus on destroying our critical institutions and leaving millions of Americans in the lurch in the name of its narcissistic, paranoid, authoritarian ideology. This list could get quite long, considering how many people have dared to publicly challenge this person.

Biden White House Is Discussing Preemptive Pardons for Those in Trump’s Crosshairs

The deliberations touch on pardoning those currently in office, elected and appointed, as well as former officials who’ve angered Trump and his loyalists.

Those who could face exposure include such members of Congress’ Jan. 6 Committee as Sen.-elect Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming. Trump has previously said Cheney “should go to Jail along with the rest of the Unselect Committee!” Also mentioned by Biden’s aides for a pardon is Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who became a lightning rod for criticism from the right during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sounds like there are some skeeered little libs that know the chickens are coming home to roost, on their corruptness, and Treason. Again stop pretending to be anything but a full blown leftist, now quick put up your list that makes you sound reasonable, and independent and put your laughing emoji up.

 

[Lesh]

Thanks Your pain brings us particular joy.

You revel in being shit?

What a sad human being