Biden Climate 'Facts' and Policies "FACT CHECKED", Earns 4 Pinnochio's

I used facts and logic... You resort to personal attack. Thank You for admitting you have nothing for evidence to claim your assertion. I really do apreaciate that you maned up enough to admit you have nothing...
What facts and what logic? You made completely unsupported assertions. Thus you continue to make the claims of an idiot.
 

There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human (Chinese) activity is the principal cause​


co2-emissions-per-country-chart.jpg
 
Here is what Biden said, and what follows is a Climate Depot point-by-point rebuttal to each of Bidenā€™s claims. I wonder if just four Pinocchio's is enough. This fact check is brutal and tears apart the Biden Green Agenda as a ruse for power.


View attachment 766022

Climate Depot: Donā€™t let Logic Get in the Way of a Good Attack

MIT.EDU (Knight Science Journalism)

Antarctica ā€“ Still frozen, for now
I expected Climate Depot to be slicker. Itā€™s a site run by Mark Morano, a former reporter for the Rush Limbaugh show and a spokesman for Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, the ranking Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee. Itā€™s clear that he doesnā€™t know anything about science but I thought a character like that would have a nicer looking website.

Today the site has fixed its crosshairs on AP science reporter Seth Borenstein, who has offended them yet again but writing about climate change as if itā€™s a problem. Iā€™ve run afoul of climate skeptic bloggers before, and so I may be biased in saying they can be childish and vindictive and lack any sense of logic. When I covered the ā€œclimategateā€ affair, a similar denier site called Watts Up With That accused me of being a porn writer because Iā€™d written some columns about the science of sex. They also wrongly accused me of having no science background. Thereā€™s always a sexist tinge when they attack me, but the way theyā€™ve gone after Borenstein shows that over at Climate Depot they are equal opportunity bullies.

It started with an interesting story about slight growth measured in Antarctic sea ice......

`
 
Last edited:

Climate Depot: Donā€™t let Logic Get in the Way of a Good Attack

MIT.EDU

Antarctica ā€“ Still frozen, for now
I expected Climate Depot to be slicker. Itā€™s a site run by Mark Morano, a former reporter for the Rush Limbaugh show and a spokesman for Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, the ranking Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee. Itā€™s clear that he doesnā€™t know anything about science but I thought a character like that would have a nicer looking website.

Today the site has fixed its crosshairs on AP science reporter Seth Borenstein, who has offended them yet again but writing about climate change as if itā€™s a problem. Iā€™ve run afoul of climate skeptic bloggers before, and so I may be biased in saying they can be childish and vindictive and lack any sense of logic. When I covered the ā€œclimategateā€ affair, a similar denier site called Watts Up With That accused me of being a porn writer because Iā€™d written some columns about the science of sex. They also wrongly accused me of having no science background. Thereā€™s always a sexist tinge when they attack me, but the way theyā€™ve gone after Borenstein shows that over at Climate Depot they are equal opportunity bullies.

It started with an interesting story about slight growth measured in Antarctic sea ice......

`
Seth Borenstein... a left wing climate activist.... You used him as a "fact Check"... :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:..

OH Please.... ROFLMAO....

How about you put up facts. Not conjecture from left wing hack sites...
 
Just wow... I put up facts. Repeatable, verifiable, facts and all I get are far left activist sites and their opinions. Conjecture. Not once do they actually address the facts presented. All of the deflections, name calling, and pointless conjecture is not getting to the bottom of the "perceived" problem. That is by design, as they cannot answer the empirically observed evidence. It utterly destroys the alarmist narrative and the power grabs being employed, so they avoid it at all costs.
 
Just wow... I put up facts. Repeatable, verifiable, facts
Where? Links to kook conspiracy websites aren't facts. They're links to idiot propaganda.

If you're not just making crap up -- and you are -- you could do more than post trash links. You could state a point directly, and back it up with hard data, so we could debate it.

Please do so. Or just keep running.
 
Standard tommy "BUT THE LINK!" gutlessness.

Deniers are a delicate crowd. Debate scares them silly. That's why they just link and run now.
That's what Sunsettommy does.
He Spams up Articles from WTFUWT and other wack job sites replete with Fabricated, massaged, or Obsolete graphs and data...
and then says You must refute the whole Crackpot article or "he wins." No discussion, YOU have to refute every line/graph.

Tommy has disclosed he is in fact a Moderator (Enforcer) at.. WUWT!

Sunsettommy is actually NONCONVERSANT on the Climate issue (thus he only spams up articles) and has me on [FAUX] Ignore since I challenged him (5 or 6 Times) to merely put up his stance on Warming/AGW or not, etc.
If he can't answer he might as well claim 'Ignore' rather than look defeated in every thread.
He has me and my meaty posts on [FAUX] Ignore but loves the one line clowns who support him.
He did respond to me ("Peeked" he said) a few days ago when He thought he had me, but that was wrong too.

In fact, he has put up many 'Cooling' posts in Skookers' "Skeptics winning" thread and elsewhere.
So we don't even know if he believes in GW, much less AGW!
He cannot even spell out/outline his own position for fear of being refuted in plain English.


`
 
Last edited:
Seth Borenstein... a left wing climate activist.... You used him as a "fact Check"... :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:..

OH Please.... ROFLMAO....

How about you put up facts. Not conjecture from left wing hack sites...
This Seth Borenstein? Tell you what, I'll put this guy up against Certified Massage Therapist Willis Eschenbach any day of the week.

Seth Borenstein​

Science Writer, The Associated Press & Adjunct Professor at New York University​

Washington, District of Columbia, United States
4K followers 500+ connections​

Join to view profile
The Associated PressThe Associated Press
Boston UniversityBoston University

About​

ADJUNCT PROFESSOR (journalism & society): New York University, Washington DC campus
Member: Society of Environmental Journalists; Investigative Reporters and Editors.

AWARDS:
OUTSTANDING BEAT REPORTING AWARD
2008. Society of Environmental Journalists. Won top individual award for beat reporting from the largest professional organization for environmental journalists.
SCRIPPS FOUNDATION NATIONAL JOURNALISM AWARD
2007. Edward J. Meeman Award for Environment Reporting.
STAR INVESTIGATIVE REPORT OF THE YEAR
2005. Combined award from headliners Club, Austin, TX; Texas Associated Press Managing Editors, Texas AP Broadcasters. With Scott Streater, Jeff Claasen.
SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS FORT WORTH CHAPTER
2005. First Amendment Award: Use of Public Records-Investigative with Streater and Claasen.
TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS MANAGING EDITORS AWARD-INVESTIGATIVE
2005. Investigative Report of the Year, class AAAA, with Streater and Claasen.
OUTSTANDING BEAT REPORTING AWARD
2004. Society of Environmental Journalists. Won top individual award for beat reporting from the largest professional organization for environmental journalists.
PULITZER PRIZE FINALIST
2004. Part of a team, coordinated by The Miami Herald, for local reporting for coverage of the Columbia space shuttle accident and causes.
 
Standard tommy "BUT THE LINK!" gutlessness.

Deniers are a delicate crowd. Debate scares them silly. That's why they just link and run now.

Thank you for acknowledging that you have no rebuttals to offer.

Fallacies doesn't work with rational people because we want a counterpoint/rebuttal of the claims not your empty bullshit.

Your lies are easy to spot as the internet remembers them.

:itsok:
 
Thank you for acknowledging that you have no rebuttals to offer.

Fallacies doesn't work with rational people because we want a counterpoint/rebuttal of the claims not your empty bullshit.

Your lies are easy to spot as the internet remembers them.

:itsok:
But, apparently, only if YOU get to decide what their claims might be.
 
This Seth Borenstein? Tell you what, I'll put this guy up against Certified Massage Therapist Willis Eschenbach any day of the week.

Seth Borenstein​

Science Writer, The Associated Press & Adjunct Professor at New York University​

Washington, District of Columbia, United States​

4K followers 500+ connections​

Join to view profile
The Associated PressThe Associated Press
Boston UniversityBoston University

About​

ADJUNCT PROFESSOR (journalism & society): New York University, Washington DC campus
Member: Society of Environmental Journalists; Investigative Reporters and Editors.

AWARDS:
OUTSTANDING BEAT REPORTING AWARD
2008. Society of Environmental Journalists. Won top individual award for beat reporting from the largest professional organization for environmental journalists.
SCRIPPS FOUNDATION NATIONAL JOURNALISM AWARD
2007. Edward J. Meeman Award for Environment Reporting.
STAR INVESTIGATIVE REPORT OF THE YEAR
2005. Combined award from headliners Club, Austin, TX; Texas Associated Press Managing Editors, Texas AP Broadcasters. With Scott Streater, Jeff Claasen.
SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS FORT WORTH CHAPTER
2005. First Amendment Award: Use of Public Records-Investigative with Streater and Claasen.
TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS MANAGING EDITORS AWARD-INVESTIGATIVE
2005. Investigative Report of the Year, class AAAA, with Streater and Claasen.
OUTSTANDING BEAT REPORTING AWARD
2004. Society of Environmental Journalists. Won top individual award for beat reporting from the largest professional organization for environmental journalists.
PULITZER PRIZE FINALIST
2004. Part of a team, coordinated by The Miami Herald, for local reporting for coverage of the Columbia space shuttle accident and causes.
Seth has been a long-time climate activist. Produce the facts not his conjecture. I am not here to talk about Seth and his fantasy world. I am here to talk about facts. Until you produce some there is no reason to go further. Even Seth admits he is an activist, which means he is not an impartial person or a journalist. So how is he capable of fact checking something he is not impartial on? HIs article is lacking facts to back up his assertions.
 
Seth Borenstein... a left wing climate activist.... You used him as a "fact Check"... :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:..

OH Please.... ROFLMAO....

How about you put up facts. Not conjecture from left wing hack sites...
This looks to me as if you wanted to talk SPECIFICALLY about Seth Borenstein. If you'd like to talk about facts, let's see what facts Seth might have been using.

Antarctica does not refute AGW.
Antarctic sea ice almost completely disappears every summer - thus it is all one-year ice.
The acceleration of Antarctic glaciers will accelerate sea level rise
The gain of ice on the Antarctic continent is trivial compared to ice loss elsewhere

Well, Billy, which of these do you believe to be nothing but an activist's innate bias?
 

Forum List

Back
Top