pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 73,699
- 28,783
- 2,210
The grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?