Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
There is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
Let me ask you a question do you think threatening the democracy of this country to reshape it is really going to help Democrats win the Senate seats needed? You’re basically admitting you’re going to turn America upside down because you can’t win in 2020
Let me ask you a question do you think threatening the democracy of this country to reshape it is really going to help Democrats win the Senate seats needed? You’re basically admitting you’re going to turn America upside down because you can’t win in 2020
I didn't say anything of the sort. Trump is going to lose in November, and Democrats are going to take the Senate.
At that point, we probably need to do a lot of things to keep something like Trump from ever happening again, and a lot of Republicans will probably be on board with it, because even they know he was a disaster for them.
www.breitbart.com
There is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
Let me ask you a question do you think threatening the democracy of this country to reshape it is really going to help Democrats win the Senate seats needed? You’re basically admitting you’re going to turn America upside down because you can’t win in 2020
I didn't say anything of the sort. Trump is going to lose in November, and Democrats are going to take the Senate.
At that point, we probably need to do a lot of things to keep something like Trump from ever happening again, and a lot of Republicans will probably be on board with it, because even they know he was a disaster for them.
A man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
A man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
One is allowing mob justice that is going to kill people and the other wants to stop it yes it is about the election. Like seriously lolA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
The black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
I just watched the video. She was belligerent disrespectful resisted arrest, if she was white she probably would’ve been beaten with a billy club.. When I heard her crying I felt so much joy when I felt her crying because she was getting her ass kicked I feel so good inside I am so happy I wish this would happen every fucking day to Black people that resist arrestThe black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The one who was locked up because a police officer assaulted her.
I just watched the video. She was belligerent disrespectful resisted arrest, if she was white she probably would’ve been beaten with a billy club.. When I heard her crying I felt so much joy when I felt her crying because she was getting her ass kicked I feel so good inside I am so happy I wish this would happen every fucking day to Black people that resist arrestThe black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The one who was locked up because a police officer assaulted her.
Society is not going to continue to baby people that weren’t raised right. If Sandra bland had a mother and a father and she talk to them like that she would’ve had her ass be in at the age of five and learn how to respect police.. we told you lefties to stop destroying the black family, blm manifesto says to break up the nuclear family.. this is what happens don’t cry nowI just watched the video. She was belligerent disrespectful resisted arrest, if she was white she probably would’ve been beaten with a billy club.. When I heard her crying I felt so much joy when I felt her crying because she was getting her ass kicked I feel so good inside I am so happy I wish this would happen every fucking day to Black people that resist arrestThe black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The one who was locked up because a police officer assaulted her.
Being disrespectful to a cop trying to antagonize you is not illegal but your position here is transparent. Why not just be honest?
Society is not going to continue to baby people that weren’t raised right. If Sandra bland had a mother and a father and she talk to them like that she would’ve had her ass be in at the age of five and learn how to respect police.. we told you lefties to stop destroying the black family, blm manifesto says to break up the nuclear family.. this is what happens don’t cry nowI just watched the video. She was belligerent disrespectful resisted arrest, if she was white she probably would’ve been beaten with a billy club.. When I heard her crying I felt so much joy when I felt her crying because she was getting her ass kicked I feel so good inside I am so happy I wish this would happen every fucking day to Black people that resist arrestThe black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The one who was locked up because a police officer assaulted her.
Being disrespectful to a cop trying to antagonize you is not illegal but your position here is transparent. Why not just be honest?
That’s what I thoughtSociety is not going to continue to baby people that weren’t raised right. If Sandra bland had a mother and a father and she talk to them like that she would’ve had her ass be in at the age of five and learn how to respect police.. we told you lefties to stop destroying the black family, blm manifesto says to break up the nuclear family.. this is what happens don’t cry nowI just watched the video. She was belligerent disrespectful resisted arrest, if she was white she probably would’ve been beaten with a billy club.. When I heard her crying I felt so much joy when I felt her crying because she was getting her ass kicked I feel so good inside I am so happy I wish this would happen every fucking day to Black people that resist arrestThe black woman who thought she was to privileged to get locked up and committed suicide?Two people are dead because of your ideology you agree with.. you can’t win.. You can’t go out and attack people retreating and then have a mob encourage you to commit suicide Lol you’re sickA man committed suicide because of mob justice.. that’s what happen.. not going to help your Ideology ever win an election again.. enjoyThere is no need for a grand jury the evidence was flat out he was innocent.. retreating warning them to stop being pinned down in a headlock is perfectly good reason for self-defense.. not sure what your missingThe grand jury only heard what the black prosecutor wanted them to hear.. Not sure you know how the system worksSo you’re the one that doesn’t trust the system. Got cha. I’ll take the video evidence, and remember the mob influence and make my decision that shapes my views thanksAre you saying you don’t know how the system works? Again you should probably read the link before you post he was already found innocent.What are you talking about there was no grand jury when he was found innocent and the victim was found as the aggressor. Did you not read the entire link that was sent read my post what don’t you understand?Are you saying the mob did not influence this case?Can you read? The mob is how the left influence this case.. and we have the votesThe system worked up until the mob.. I guess we’ll see who the country vote for .. but seeing that the supreme court will be 6-4 for the next 30 yearsDid they trust the system? The DA said the victim was the aggressor. No charges. It wasn’t until a mob banged pots and pans out side his house.. are you for mob justice?The video did .. mic dropSo he wasn’t pinned down on the ground in a head lock?His life didn't matter.
Jake Gardner killed protester while defending his bar during BLM riots.
Except his bar wasn't in any real danger, and he just randomly shot someone.
Saves us the expense of a trial.
The grand jury didn't see it that way.
The argument has been to just trust the system. Are we now backtracking on that argument also?
No, they did not trust the system just the same as you are not now. They were condemned for not trusting the system.
Are we now saying they were right?
So you are for street justice now also? Justice is only for those who vote a certain way? BTW, when did we add another justice?
I can read how you avoid answering questions concerning your positions. I can read your blatant hypocrisy.
There was a mob sitting on the grand jury? If not, I have no idea what your position is as to why you believe that after seeing all the evidence (all of the evidence) the grand jury shouldn't have indicted.
The grand jury found against him. Why don't you accept the ruling of the system you expect others to trust?
It doesn't work for many. That's why we have protests. You seem to be agreeing so why not support the protests?
You'll take part of the evidence but dismiss the evidence the grand jury also ruled on. Do I trust the system? No. Neither do you. Seems to me you want it to work for some but screw certain others.
That's why the system doesn't work for many.
I do. That's the complaints of the protesters that you have dismissed.
The prosecutor in the Timothy Loehman case presented the evidence but when it appeared they would find for guilt he refused to allow them to vote. That was all good though, right?
I'm missing nothing. Your position has been very clear. I just like rubbing it in.
It's really sad that you make this about an election. Two people are dead and all you care about is a stupid election.
Did you care when it happened to Sandra Bland? She didn't even get the courtesy of a grand jury.
The one who was locked up because a police officer assaulted her.
Being disrespectful to a cop trying to antagonize you is not illegal but your position here is transparent. Why not just be honest?
Almost there. I do wish this site would have S.F. take down their link to here.
Oh sure..They locked us down, killed grandparents, accused a decent man of being a gang rapist on the word of a crooked lawyer, rioted, looted, burned cities, assassinated peace officers, and now they are threatening to do more, if they don’t get their way. Oh, and they want your vote.
www.politico.com
Breibart has more viewers than cnn and Politico combinedOh sure..They locked us down, killed grandparents, accused a decent man of being a gang rapist on the word of a crooked lawyer, rioted, looted, burned cities, assassinated peace officers, and now they are threatening to do more, if they don’t get their way. Oh, and they want your vote.
Guy, if you have to retreat to Breitbart as you happy place, you need to re-evaluate.
Trump's scare tactics aren't working.
Trump’s Scare Tactics Aren’t Working on Women in the Suburbs
North of Charlotte, N.C., voters of both parties can see through the GOP’s strategy of frightening them about an urban crime wave.
