- Thread starter
- #181
So you think killing the next Micheal Jordan or Einstein is no big deal?
We could also be killing the Next Hitler or Charlie Manson... So no big deal. We might even be killing the next Urkel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you think killing the next Micheal Jordan or Einstein is no big deal?
Trolling or not I cannot see why you keep coming back for more after the beatings you take...surrender was your best optionNot sure why I'll try to engage your trolling.
Those are specious arguments..."gun control" is just another attempt of/at left wing end runs around the constitution, [thats why the left never calls it 'gun control that does not infringe or violate']...Yup, murder is a big deal. Which is why we need sensible gun control, poverty relief programs, treating addiction as a medical issue instead of a criminal one, etc.
Sounds like the perfect argument for those who oppose abortionAbortion, not a big deal because at the end of the day, if a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, she'll find a way to not be pregnant.
Yup you have no problem killing the return of Jesus don't you?We could also be killing the Next Hitler or Charlie Manson... So no big deal. We might even be killing the next Urkel.
View attachment 600979
The constitution isn't a suicide pact, and the Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias.Those are specious arguments..."gun control" is just another attempt of/at left wing end runs around the constitution, [thats why the left never calls it 'gun control that does not infringe or violate']...
Not at all. Welfare has massively reduced poverty in this country....And "welfare" is a poverty relief program that works exactly the way its critics said it would...
...and "treating addiction as a medical condition" is just another way the 60's liberal mentality perpetuates drug use in America for a condition they created, should we be making needles easier or harder for addicts to get their hands on joe?
Sounds like the perfect argument for those who oppose abortion
Yup you have no problem killing the return of Jesus don't you?
and that includes the right to bear armsThe constitution isn't a suicide pact,
...And why the right to bear arms is so important in maintaining them...and how infringing on that is a great big NO-NO, but what it really is is a red flag amendment to alert the citizenry when the tyrants have come for it and themand the Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias.
...And why the right to bear arms is so important in maintaining them...and how infringing on that is a great big NO-NO, but what it really is is a red flag amendment to alert the citizenry when the tyrants have come for it and them
problem solvedNot at all. Welfare has massively reduced poverty in this country.
I won't deny it helps prevent disease, but the drug users and proponents of drug use are themselves responsible for those diseases and are the ones that should be held accountable for its expenses, not those who are smart enough to see the folly of giving addicts needles and then pretending it does not make rehab less desirableWe made needles easier to get so that drug users wouldn't spread diseaes like HIV< and it worked.
and making needles easier to get will surely make them want to get into rehab, right?...and its not what "WE" need to do but what the users and advocates need to do themselves.What we need to do is make sure addicts can get into rehab.
what is quite opposite joe?Quite the opposite, but you are kind of slow.
I won't deny it helps prevent disease, but the drug users and proponents of drug use are themselves responsible for those diseases and are the ones that should be held accountable for its expenses, not those who are smart enough to see the folly of giving addicts needles and then pretending it does not make rehab less desirable
and making needles easier to get will surely make them want to get into rehab, right?...and its not what "WE" need to do but what the users and advocates need to do themselves.
Just the end of Satanic worshipers like you...The constitution isn't a suicide pact, and the Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias.
Not at all. Welfare has massively reduced poverty in this country.
We made needles easier to get so that drug users wouldn't spread diseaes like HIV< and it worked. What we need to do is make sure addicts can get into rehab.
Quite the opposite, but you are kind of slow.
Well, considering if Jesus actually "returned" that would be the end of the world, aborting him would be a good thing, we can keep on living.
Of course, Jesus never existed, so he can't come back.
Just the end of Satanic worshipers like you...
Uhm he is every time you look in the mirrorThe sad thing is you think "Satan" is real.
Has absolutely nothing to do with my post, sounds just like a keyboard pounding rant from someone tired of being on the losing end of every argument he/she has ever been in...Bullshit. You owning a gun does not prevent tyranny. It just makes it easier to kill your neighbor over the dog shitting on your lawn, and that happens way too often.
why would they win joe?The government has tanks and bombers. They win.
really, so "getting them into rehab" was not the point then? just some clever ruse of yours to keep me from seeing it was their partners you were/was talking about? every time you get shot down/caught in a lie, you try to pretend something else was the pointOr they could spread it to their partners... that's the point.
yeah, that way you don't have to address the contradiction that once again has tripped you upTwo separate issues.
That is not the point. It's filthy religion which is forcing them to be anti abortion. You are not pro life. You are pro birth because you think God has told you so. In fact God does not exist.This is a massive red herring and missing the point entirely (the part in bold).
It's about what's right and what's moral.
Drugs and certain types of weapons are illegal and outlawed too but if there's a demand for it people will always get it - but again it's about what's right.
No-one's stupid. Back street abortions will still happen, that doesn't mean you encourage abortions in law either.
Even in the short-term if this new law stops even just a small handful of abortions then it's done good right away.
Medium to longer term it will encourage folk to be more responsible and in time this flippant attitude of using abortion as a form of contraception will vanish.
That's the whole point.
My post was about an amendment that was designed to raise red flags when the tyrants show up and for the purpose of taking action politically in the hopes of making fighting unnecessary...
and joe, that dog spitting thing, that doesn't happen, that's just an old fascists tale
So the Supreme Court just overturned Roe v. Wade in the most cowardly way possible.
Of course, Roe was always based on some legal jiggery-pokery, in that it found a "right to privacy" that never really existed without addressing the issue of when life begins.
The reason why the court did this was because they knew the laws on the books in most states in 1973 were unworkable and had to go, because no one was following them. But like all failed ideas, this time will be different, the advocates say.
Okay, let's get real here.
For the anti-abortion crowd, what is your real solution? Are you going to put pregnant women under house arrest to make sure they don't get abortions? Or are you just going to overturn Roe v. Wade and pretend you accomplished something.
This is one of the absolutely stupid suggestions that comes up. We don't use such methods to prevent any other crimes. Why would it be different for abortion?
All I can do is address where I stand on the issues, personally. I'm male, widowed, elderly and don't consider myself an old geezer mentally.So the Supreme Court just overturned Roe v. Wade in the most cowardly way possible.
Of course, Roe was always based on some legal jiggery-pokery, in that it found a "right to privacy" that never really existed without addressing the issue of when life begins.
The reason why the court did this was because they knew the laws on the books in most states in 1973 were unworkable and had to go, because no one was following them. But like all failed ideas, this time will be different, the advocates say.
Okay, let's get real here.
For the anti-abortion crowd, what is your real solution? Are you going to put pregnant women under house arrest to make sure they don't get abortions? Or are you just going to overturn Roe v. Wade and pretend you accomplished something.
How about prostitution? Prostitution is illegal in 49 states. Yet it is believed that there are 1 million working prostitutes in the United States today, and you can find massage parlors, strip joints and escort services pretty easily.
Okay, how about alcohol? Remember prohibition? (Well, even I'm not *that* old.) Well guess what, that didn't stop people from drinking. People found all sorts of imaginative ways to get around that law, Al Capone was pretty much openly smuggling alcohol into the country or making it illegally and the only way the government actually got him was on income tax evasion.
How's that war on drugs working out for you? Well, not so well. According to estimates, 19.1 million Americans over the age of 12 have used drugs within the last 30 days. "Just Say No (not today)" We spend billions on it, lock up more people than any country in the world. Hey, how many drug users are you going to want to cut loose to make room for the abortion patients?
Now, taking all of these factors into account- Exactly what mechanism are you guys going to use to ban abortion? Because none of these other prohibitions seem to work terribly well, especially when law enforcement is already stretched pretty thin.
Actually, we have.
Read up on prohibition some time, dummy. The religious nutters got alcohol banned by convincing stupid people that those dirty German immigrants were doing something nefarious for the Kaiser in the local tavern.
Then when they actually banned alcohol... nobody obeyed the law. Alcohol consumption was 70% of what it was pre-prohibition by the time the 21st Amendment was passed