You answered the question of how ancients knew the earth was round.
You never answered how they knew that the deep ocean floor had mountain and valleys.
They didn't know the earth was round. Some might have figured it out back then but it wasn't common knowledge. Knowing the ocean floors were like mountains was even easier to know than the earth is round.
The Bible says it was round.
Yea, like a pancake.
Theists like to point to Isaiah 40:22, which says: "It is he who sits above the circle of the earth".
In Job, the shape of the Earth is a little more specific, when it says that the "Earth takes shape like clay under a seal."
Have you seen what clay seals look like?
STRETCH!!!
I know you will not be convinced of God.
On Judgment day you will.
Nuts like you and your preacher won't convince me. What will?
A particular standard of evidence is required to prove any claim. This ‘standard’ is adjusted depending upon the nature of the claim. Since god’s existence is an extraordinary claim, perhaps
the most extraordinary claim, proving it requires equally extraordinary evidence.
The standard of evidence required to prove a god’s existence is immediately more than any personal anecdote, witness testimony, ancient book or reported miracle – none of which can be considered extraordinarily reliable. The human mind is also highly susceptible to being fooled and even fooling itself. One could be suffering from an hallucination or a form of undiagnosed schizophrenia, hysteria or psychosis, ruling out even our own senses as reliable evidence gathering mechanisms in this case. As strange as it sounds, misunderstood aliens might even be attempting to interact with us using extremely advanced technology. In fact, reality itself could be a computer
simulationwhich we unknowingly inhabit.
Every conceivable argument, every imaginable piece of evidence for god is not without some fatal flaw or
more likely explanation which precludes it from being used as definitive proof. Note: This is not the same as being
close-minded.
There is, however, a simple answer to this question: God is what it would take to convince an atheist. An omniscient god would know the exact standard of evidence required to convince
any atheist of its existence and, being omnipotent, it would also be able to immediately produce this evidence. If it wanted to, a god could conceivably change the brain chemistry of any individual in order to compel them to believe. It could even restructure the entire universe in such a way as to make non-belief impossible.
In short, a god actually proving its own existence is what would convince
any atheist of said god’s existence.