The OP does everything he can to turn us against God. Pray on his behalf. His eternal future is at stake.
True the OP is not a Christian and his purpose is to lead astray.
But there is always a kernal of truth in the lies Satan tells. Theosis is not antithetical to Christianity. In fact a huge number of Christians embrace it. I am not speaking of non christian ideas like the Mormon "exhaltation" but rather what St Athanasius said " "The Son of God became man so that we might become God."
Thanks for the compliment of not calling me a Christian.
You are correct as I do not adore a genocidal son murdering God.
I am a moral man, not a fool.
Regards
DL
Here ya go. Let me slap you in the face with Christ again. I know you know what is coming. I throw it in your face every time you lie about God murdering His Son. You ready??
Christ to Greatestiam: No one takes it from me, but I
lay it
down of my own accord. I
have authority to
lay it
down and
authority to take it up again.
To big of an immoral coward to take responsibility for your actions I see.
Care to debate?
Human sacrifice is evil and God/Yahweh demanding one and Jesus accepting one is evil. Jesus accepted the premise of his sacrifice being somehow just. This is evil.
Those trying to profit from that evil are evil. Do just a bit of thinking and you will agree.
Imagine you have two children. One of your children does something wrong – say it curses, or throws a temper tantrum, or something like that. In fact, say it does this on a regular basis, and you continually forgive your child, but it never seems to change.
Now suppose one day you’ve had enough, you need to do something different. You still wish to forgive your child, but nothing has worked. Do you go to your second child, your good child, and punish it to atone for the sins of the first?
In fact, if you ever saw a parent on the street punish one of their children for the actions of their other child, how would you react? Would you support their decision, or would you be offended? Because God punished Jesus -- his good child -- for the sins of his other children.
Interestingly, some historical royal families would beat their slaves when their own children did wrong – you should not, after all, ever beat a prince. The question is: what kind of lesson does that teach the child who actually did the harm? Does it teach them to be a better person, to stop doing harm, or does it teach them both that they won't themselves be punished, and also that punishing other people is normal? I know that's not a lesson I would want to teach my children, and I suspect it's not a lesson most Christians would want to teach theirs. So why does God?
For me, that’s at least one significant reason I find Jesus’ atonement of our sin to be morally repugnant – of course, that’s assuming Jesus ever existed; that original sin actually exists; that God actually exists; etc.
Having another innocent person suffer for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral. To abdicate personal responsibility or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Do you agree?
If not, please show how it is morally and legally good to punish the innocent instead of the guilty, bearing in mind that all legal systems think that punishing the guilty is what is justice.
Regards
DL