Concerned American
Diamond Member
More the reason for her to exercise responsibility.Pregnancy and child birth carry far more risk and mortality for the woman
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More the reason for her to exercise responsibility.Pregnancy and child birth carry far more risk and mortality for the woman
How about you mind your own business.
More the reason for her to exercise responsibility.
Please review my post #4 and keep up. Get after it.Yep so snip snip. Get after it
~~~~~~Get a vasectomy. You'll never cause an abortion to happen again.
^Please review my post #4 and keep up. Get after it.
The point is that unless a sexually active man makes it impossible for himself to get a woman pregnant, he cannot possibly know whether that woman has been impregnated by him and had an abortion if she wants to keep it secret.~~~~~~
In the same vein of thought, get your tubes tied it will produce the same effect.
.Even if medication abortions are safe to use for women, it appears to me to be fatal to the lil baboo in the womb. Though the term "infanticide" refers to the murdering of an infant up to one year of age by the infants mother, it seems to me that there is a VERY FINE LINE separating(?) abortion from infanticide. Would it not be easier for a women that is incapable of loving their baboo to be, just to arrange for an adoption during pregnancy to parents that are capable of loving the lil baboo to be? Better yet for women incapable of exhibiting the emotion of love why not use rubbers, diaphragms or the pill??? I mean the woman can still get off & not have to worry about a baboo that could prove a burden for her?
You would be fine with snapping the spine of a baby in breech????There is no fine line. There is one clear line beyond which it is infanticide and that is birth.
Pregnancy and child birth carry far more risk and mortality for the woman than medication abortion.
Same goes for men.
If a woman is not willing to bear a child, she's not ready for irresponsible sex.
.
If a woman is not willing to bear a child, she's not ready for irresponsible sex.
Then spread the word, you old geezers. The youth has always listened really well to that messageSame goes for men
I appreciate your concern! Yes I will enlighten you on the meaning of the term "baboo. "Baboo is in reference to someone that is VERY special to another person, usually a female is called a baboo by a male. Regarding deer, ESPECIALLY FAWNS, they are so indescribably cute/gorgeous that they are often referred to as "baboos" by those in the trade. I only use the term "lil baboo(s)" when describing human babies & fawns as they are the only creations high enough to be worthy of that honor.You've used the non-word 'baboo' at least 5 times and so I'm wondering if this is a jaded attempt to infer racism?
If not then a simple explanation for your use of a slang expression can erase all doubts.
If no satisfactory explanation is offered, I'm going to have to consider this as an attempt at vile racism and it should be reported.
They're 100% unsafe for the baby!Even if medication abortions are safe to use for women, it appears to me to be fatal to the lil baboo in the womb. Though the term "infanticide" refers to the murdering of an infant up to one year of age by the infants mother, it seems to me that there is a VERY FINE LINE separating(?) abortion from infanticide. Would it not be easier for a women that is incapable of loving their baboo to be, just to arrange for an adoption during pregnancy to parents that are capable of loving the lil baboo to be? Better yet for women incapable of exhibiting the emotion of love why not use rubbers, diaphragms or the pill??? I mean the woman can still get off & not have to worry about a baboo that could prove a burden for her?
Troll alert. Wait here for the great big billy goat gruff. three billy goats gruff at DuckDuckGoThe point is that unless a sexually active man makes it impossible for himself to get a woman pregnant, he cannot possibly know whether that woman has been impregnated by him and had an abortion if she wants to keep it secret.
~~~~~~The point is that unless a sexually active man makes it impossible for himself to get a woman pregnant, he cannot possibly know whether that woman has been impregnated by him and had an abortion if she wants to keep it secret.
Then spread the word, you old geezers. The youth has always listened really well to that message
It takes two to Tango, all I'm saying is the woman bears responsibility just like a guy does in an unwanted pregnancy.Did he choose to use birth control?
Troll alert. Wait here for the great big billy goat gruff. three billy goats gruff at DuckDuckGo
Agree.It takes two to Tango, all I'm saying is the woman bears responsibility just like a guy does in an unwanted pregnancy.
Who cares? If she secretly has an abortion, her partner will never know. He's got to snip that cord.~~~~~~
If a woman is sexually liberated enough to sleep with multiple partners, she should be responsible to protect herself from Pregnancy, STDs and HIV. Leaving it up to her partner is irresponsible.