Not sure how you came to that conclusion. I am not asking you to choose one. I am asking you if those are the only two options.You’re asking me to choose one, as an agnostic, I can’t.We don't know what? That God does exist or God doesn't exist? Isn't that your exact contention as a supposed agnostic?Third option, we don’t know. Just being honest and realistic.What's the third option then, Taz?Makes no sense at all.This is pretty simple, Taz.The universe is proof that you’re a doofus.I never claimed to know everything, Taz. And I have proof, you just don't accept it for no good reason.That doofus ding who thinks he knows everything... without any proof whatsoever.And who would dingbat be?Opinion, sure, that's what I tell dingbat all the time. But these doofusses think that it's fact without proof. Those are the fucking idiots.If there is no proof, you make an educated guess on what you think the facts are. It is known as opinion. Guess you are the fucking idiot.If you believe something for which you know there is no proof for, you're a fucking idiot, plain and simple.If there is something that you believe and there are no facts either way, it is not a lie to you because it is what you believe.A lie in the sense that people who say "there is proof for a god" are lying because they know deep down that there's no such thing. Same with atheists, they say something knowing they can't prove it, hence it's a lie.How would you know either side is a lie?Because it will never come I should pick a side that I know is a lie? Um...no.It will never come. You are afraid to make a decision on what you believe. You are waiting for the second coming like those with religion.To what? 2 unprovable statements? Agnostic are smart enough to wait for real proof either way.Agnostic. Afraid to commit.Atheists are just as deluded as theists, as there's no proof for or against the existence of an invisible superbeing that rules the universe. Making Agnosticism the thinking person's choice.
At the heart of this debate is whether or not the material world was created by spirit. If the material world were not created by spirit, then everything which has occurred since the beginning of space and time are products of the material world. Everything which is incorporeal proceeded from the corporeal. There is no middle ground. There is no other option. Either the material world was created by spirit or it wasn't. All other options will simplify to one of these two lowest common denominators which are mutually exclusive. Right? It is either is or it isn't, right?
You do realize that your rejection of this simple binary matrix is literally proving what I said... that you fail to accept proof for no good reason. I haven't even got to the proof part because I can't get you to agree that there are only two possible outcomes. It's self evident that there are only two options here. Either it is or it isn't. You can't even bring yourself to admit this simple, self evident truth because you are afraid of where it will lead and prove that you reject proof for no good reason.
Of course technically I have already proven it.
Cause those are still the only two options and your reluctance to admit those are the only two options prove you reject proof for no good reason.