Anyone have a pic of these "fishing boats" we are blowing up?

[SassyIrishLass]

Then your fuhrer should tell us who they are.

Grow up. You know they're not fishing boats but you just have to ankle snap

 

[struth]

No, Trump has not. He blowviates and bellows, but never presents any evidence of any kind.

A normal President would have built a robust, evidence based case to the public befor acting. That is what JFK did during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Trump, by contrast, is trying to hide what he is doing. Everything that is, except the good TV”.

Which is what this is all really about.

numerous president's over the years have built a large robust case showing that cartels are engaged in drug trafficking, sorry in your little pro-narcoterrorist world you missed out on that information

 

[Nostra]

No, Trump has not. He blowviates and bellows, but never presents any evidence of any kind.

A normal President would have built a robust, evidence based case to the public befor acting. That is what JFK did during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Trump, by contrast, is trying to hide what he is doing. Everything that is, except the good TV”.

Which is what this is all really about.

You have been shown pics of drugs they confiscate, so what is he hiding, Simp?

 

[Nostra]

Which has nothing to do with Trump’s blow up campaign.

Conventional intradiction works better anyway. Has done for 40 years.

They are considered pirates, and terrorists.

That makes it open season on them, Simp.

See below for how your Dimwinger Cult narrative gets destroyed.

He has congressional authorization.

Chucky Schumer actually voted for the authorization.

"A boat in international waters that is not running a national flag is categorized in international law the same way a pirate is. Such boats have absolutely no national or international protections, and you cannot commit a war crime against them.A vessel in international waters is required under UNCLOS to sail under the flag of a specific nation. If it does not, it is legally considered a stateless vessel. A stateless vessel has no right to the protections normally afforded to ships under a national flag, including immunity from interference by other states.UNCLOS Articles 92, 94, 110, and customary maritime law spell out the consequences clearly:1. Stateless vessels have no sovereign protection. A flagged ship is an extension of its flag-state’s sovereignty. A stateless vessel is not. This matters because “war crimes” presuppose protected persons or protected property. A stateless vessel is legally unprotected.2. Any state may stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel. UNCLOS Article 110 explicitly authorizes boarding and seizure. The law does not require states to risk their own personnel or assets while doing so. Disabling a vessel that refuses inspection, including firing on it, is legally permitted under both UNCLOS and long-established state practice.3. War crimes require an armed conflict. You cannot commit a “war crime” outside an armed conflict. War crimes occur only within the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). Enforcing maritime law against a stateless vessel is a law enforcement action, not an IHL situation.No armed conflict = no war crime possible.4. Lethal force may be used when a vessel refuses lawful orders. The International Maritime Organization’s “Use of Force” guidance for maritime interdiction recognizes that disabling fire, even lethal force, is lawful when a vessel refuses lawful boarding, attempts to flee, poses a threat, or engages in illicit activities such as piracy or narcotics trafficking.Once again: law enforcement rules apply, not IHL.5. Sinking a stateless vessel is not prohibited by UNCLOS. UNCLOS permits seizure of a stateless vessel and leaves the means entirely to the enforcing state so long as necessity and proportionality are respected. If the vessel flees, attacks, or refuses lawful commands, sinking it is legally permissible. Many states routinely do this to drug-smuggling vessels (e.g., semi-submersibles) without it ever being treated as a war crime.6. No flag = no jurisdictional shield. The entire reason international law requires ships to fly a flag is to prevent this exact situation. Flagless vessels are legally vulnerable by design.Because a stateless vessel has no protected status, because UNCLOS authorizes interdiction of such vessels, because lethal force may be used in maritime law enforcement when necessary, and because war crimes require an armed conflict that is not present here, sinking an unflagged ship in international waters is not a war crime."



2:30 PM · Dec 7, 2025·29K Views

 

[ColonelAngus]

They reported 2 dead and 21 injured.

I thought all these pieces of shit were getting smoked.

Most of them were only injured and were saved?

Too bad.

 

[struth]

You have been shown pics of drugs they confiscate, so what is he hiding, Simp?

TimFitz doesn't care about reality, facts, and evidence....they run counter to his core beliefs

 

[TimFitz]

Which has everything to do with stopping your drug smuggling heroes.

40 years of “conventional interdiction” has done little when 2025 has seen the Coast Guard set record seizures.

Remarkable how you morons believe the drug smugglers are just smuggling luggage.

Most people would see that as the Coast Guard being MORE effective.

They get to capture the drugs (which makes is possible to figure out where they came from) and the trafficers, (makeing it possible to find out who is on either end of the transaction.

 

[TimFitz]

TimFitz doesn't care about reality, facts, and evidence....they run counter to his core beliefs

When you produce some evidence, you can make that claim.

But you never have, and neither has your beloved fuhrer.

 

[Nostra]

When you produce some evidence, you can make that claim.

But you never have, and neither has your beloved fuhrer.

Lies.

 

[struth]

When you produce some evidence, you can make that claim.

But you never have, and neither has your beloved fuhrer.

hahaha...see here, he continues to ignore, evidence, facts and reality.

 

[Hollie]

Most people would see that as the Coast Guard being MORE effective.

They get to capture the drugs (which makes is possible to figure out where they came from) and the trafficers, (makeing it possible to find out who is on either end of the transaction.

Most people would see that being confused about the smugglers carrying drugs instead of luggage was pretty obvious.

Most people would see that making efforts to stop the traffickers was of value to the country being the destination of those drugs.

Most people see that the rabid left is more concerned with disposition of the traffickers than with the victims of their drugs.

 

[BS Filter]

Good then let’s take out the Drug Pipeline onshore ( prior to on loading to the boats )

I'm all for it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I'm all for it.

that would require war with the countries allowing it to happen.

 

[BS Filter]

that would require war with the countries allowing it to happen.

Wouldn't last very long.

 

[Failzero]

that would require war with the countries allowing it to happen.

Did it take a War for Clinton to bomb every Serbian Bridge on the Danube ( With Civilian traffic on them at the time ) ?

 

[sparky]

~S~

 

[BS Filter]

Most people would see that as the Coast Guard being MORE effective.

They get to capture the drugs (which makes is possible to figure out where they came from) and the trafficers, (makeing it possible to find out who is on either end of the transaction.

We already know all that.

 

[toobfreak]

TimFitz doesn't care about reality, facts, and evidence....they run counter to his core beliefs

No, he represents a group of people who, just like the same group when they wanted enemy combatant terrorists from Iraq caught on the battlefield be tried in NYC courtrooms instead of at military tribunals at Guantanamo.

The obvious reason being that these people want these drug runners in these boats captured and brought to the USA to stand trial for the same reason of gaining access to the American legal system. They can't do that if Trump keeps blowing them up out to sea.

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 1192042
~S~

Oh well, in to the next Dimswinger pissy pants made up scandal.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Oh well, in to the next Dimswinger pissy pants made up scandal.



View attachment 1192881

They typically have a duller look on their faces.