Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

That doesn't prove it. Type it out. Or we could talk more about your fake physics degree.
 
I’m not using photos for accuracy, I use photos to show that water hadn’t risen.

Are you suggesting you can measure accurately?
ding it’s called evidence
 
ding it’s called evidence
Photos cannot be used to accurately measure sea level rise because they cannot account for fluctuations in tide levels, which can significantly alter the apparent waterline in a picture, making it difficult to distinguish actual sea level changes from natural tidal variations, even when comparing photos taken at the same location at different times; additionally, photos lack the precise data needed to measure sea level change, which is best obtained through dedicated instruments like tide gauges and satellite altimetry.
 
Photos cannot be used to accurately measure sea level rise because they cannot account for fluctuations in tide levels, which can significantly alter the apparent waterline in a picture, making it difficult to distinguish actual sea level changes from natural tidal variations, even when comparing photos taken at the same location at different times; additionally, photos lack the precise data needed to measure sea level change, which is best obtained through dedicated instruments like tide gauges and satellite altimetry.
Nothing is accurate for the past! Again, I’m waiting
 
Nothing is accurate for the past! Again, I’m waiting
What are you waiting for? Please do share with me your list of acceptable data and what it takes to make it acceptable and unacceptable. Because from where I am sitting you have just invalidated anything you think you believe because according to you we can't know anything. And yet you still believe you know things.

I'm really starting to lose respect for your ability to apply logic.
 
What are you waiting for? Please do share with me your list of acceptable data and what it takes to make it acceptable and unacceptable. Because from where I am sitting you have just invalidated anything you think you believe because according to you we can't know anything. And yet you still believe you know things.

I'm really starting to lose respect for your ability to apply logic.
Temperatures from hundreds of years ago. Accurate
 
Temperatures from hundreds of years ago. Accurate
How do you know? What makes them special? And what difference does it make anyway? How are you going to get a single temperature for the entire planet. Especially since you don't believe anything is accurate.

No... I'm afraid you are just going to have to go through life not knowing anything at all since you believe nothing is accurate.
 
Wasn’t your question. Again, northern hemisphere is in control of the climate
Which climate ZONE ?
Map of @ 2 dozen types: Köppen–Geiger Climate Classification Map

The Climate Zones Of The World - WorldAtlas


ETC.

Many maps and variations to pick from. Point is there is no "ONE" climate.
825px-Koppen-Geiger_Map_v2_World_1991%E2%80%932020.svg.png

 
I told you. The ocean's distribution of heat to the Arctic from the Atlantic.


WATER CAUSES ICE

except water is too warm to cause ice


and it takes and IQ over 5 to notice that...
 
Photos cannot be used to accurately measure sea level rise because they cannot account for fluctuations in tide levels, which can significantly alter the apparent waterline in a picture, making it difficult to distinguish actual sea level changes from natural tidal variations, even when comparing photos taken at the same location at different times; additionally, photos lack the precise data needed to measure sea level change, which is best obtained through dedicated instruments like tide gauges and satellite altimetry.



What utter bullshit.


The notorious "INVISIBLE" "Ocean Rise"
 
That doesn't prove it. Type it out. Or we could talk more about your fake physics degree.



What it documents is that the McBullshit "water causes ice" crap you and CO2 FRAUD push is off by a factor of at least 10 on all measures of ice age glacier.

You and McBullshit argue that 2.5 mile thick glaciers on or near Chicago, from an ice age that started in northern Canada, was only 75k years old.

Greenland's ice, slightly more than 1 mile thick, has 130k years of ice core data and that's not even halfway down.

The only place on Earth where we do have 2.5 mile thick glacier, Antarctica, has 2.7 million years of ice core data, and that's about halfway down.

Ice Ages scrape off everything but bedrock, so the bottom layers from the original ice age go with that.


Antarctica's ice age is 40 million years old

Greenland's ice age is 1-2 million years old

North American Ice Age began 30-50 million years ago, and Ellesmere island is still in ice age


75k years old for 2.5 mile thick glacier is as dumb as claiming water causes ice.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom