Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[abu afak]

Yup, the debate is Over.
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

And it's looking like 2024 might beat 2023!


`

 

[abu afak]

Still Waiting

Moving this target is deceitful ... my only allowance is to split what temperature data we do have in half ... or two 70-year periods to average, and this gives us two numbers, the later one is slightly higher that the earlier one ... thus slight global warming ... and 1ºC is slight ...

You mentioned the 30-year-average and this will give us global cooling during World War Two and all the rebuilding afterwards ... an obvious counter-example to the main AGW argument ...

Again ... in the scientific media, we have to state our time interval ... or we won't get published ... simple ...

I have questions for YOU: one of the many BS artists posting here.
Your whole life is "Physics dropping"/showing off with meaningless greek letters/formulas.
SO:
1. Is the climate warming?
2. Is man (and his GHGs) contributing to this in a significant or majority degree?
YES OR NO?
3. Optional/dependent: How fast is it warming/melting and what would be "Catastrophic" in that respect?

Despite the fact you must know Man is, you spend all your time BuIIshitting with with tangential Physics formulas and not telling your allies they are wrong and not wanting to be call a "lib"/"Leftist"/"Chicken little."

TIME TO SPEAK UP ON THEE ISSUE BOY.
`

 

[jc456]

Still Waiting

I have questions for YOU: one of the many BS artists posting here.
Your whole life is "Physics dropping"/showing off with meaningless greek letters/formulas.
SO:
1. Is the climate warming?
2. Is man (and his GHGs) contributing to this in a significant or majority degree?
YES OR NO?
3. Optional/dependent: How fast is it warming/melting and what would be "Catastrophic" in that respect?

Despite the fact you must know Man is, you spend all your time BuIIshitting with with tangential Physics formulas and not telling your allies they are wrong and not wanting to be call a "lib"/"Leftist"/"Chicken little."

TIME TO SPEAK UP ON THEE ISSUE BOY.
`

How come you never stated the problem?

 

[mamooth]

College science, see below ... there's nothing catastrophic about 100-year averages ... only 1-minute averages are dangerous ...

You're just rambling now. Nothing you say makes any sense in the context of the discussion. You try to bluff your way through with this BS, but it just doesn't work.

Ah ... you're advocating a Runaway Greenhouse Effect

English, do you speak it? I'm specifically rejecting it.

I'm pointing out that your theory requires a runaway albedo effect, and since that doesn't happen, that's yet another fact that shows your theory is wrong.

Do either of you know how to read a scientific instrument? .

In order to pull of the condescending act, you have to actually be intelligent. That means I can pull it off. You sound ridiculous when you try.

 

[mamooth]

When I get into my car, I influence if it starts.

I see. Your excuse for your dishonesty is that you can't understand basic English.

That is, you're pleading stupidity.

I think everyone here will accept that explanation. Deniers are almost always on the left side of the bell curve.

 

[mamooth]

Interesting what you avoid. I never have thought to do what you do

No, sealioning is what your side does, not ours.

We don't do the "I'm just asking questions" sleazy BS.

We state a point clearly and directly.

When you have the facts behind you and you understand the topic, you can do that.

You can't do that.

 

[jc456]

No, sealioning is what your side does, not ours.

We don't do the "I'm just asking questions" sleazy BS.

We state a point clearly and directly.

When you have the facts behind you and you understand the topic, you can do that.

You can't do that.

You be Francising

 

[Robert W]

I see. Your excuse for your dishonesty is that you can't understand basic English.

That is, you're pleading stupidity.

I think everyone here will accept that explanation. Deniers are almost always on the left side of the bell curve.

You want a clue why you can't ever act like a scientist?

I will explain it to you. I talk of real honest issues. You attack posters.

 

[mamooth]

You want a clue why you can't ever act like a scientist?

I will explain it to you. I talk of real honest issues. You attack posters.

Your plea of stupidity was already accepted, so there's no need to repeat it.

 

[jc456]

Your plea of stupidity was already accepted, so there's no need to repeat it.

Still no debate

 

[Robert W]

Your plea of stupidity was already accepted, so there's no need to repeat it.

Still no debate.

 

[Robert W]

Robert W , I want to know why we can only make warm warmer, but can’t make cold warmer

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, you can "make cold warmer" by applying heat to it, whether it's a cold object, a cold room, or even your own body by wearing layers, using heating devices like space heaters or hot water bottles, or engaging in physical activity to generate internal heat.

Key points to remember:

• Heat transfer:
  To make something cold warmer, you need to transfer heat from a warmer source to the cold object.
  
  
• Methods to apply heat:
  • Direct heat sources: Using a stove, oven, heating pad, or hair dryer.
    
    
  • Ambient heat: Turning up the thermostat in a room, using a space heater, or simply being in a warmer environment.
    
    
  • Body heat: Wearing warm clothes, covering exposed skin, and moving around to generate internal heat.

 

[jc456]

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, you can "make cold warmer" by applying heat to it, whether it's a cold object, a cold room, or even your own body by wearing layers, using heating devices like space heaters or hot water bottles, or engaging in physical activity to generate internal heat.

Key points to remember:

• Heat transfer:
  To make something cold warmer, you need to transfer heat from a warmer source to the cold object.
  
  
• Methods to apply heat:
  • Direct heat sources: Using a stove, oven, heating pad, or hair dryer.
    
    
  • Ambient heat: Turning up the thermostat in a room, using a space heater, or simply being in a warmer environment.
    
    
  • Body heat: Wearing warm clothes, covering exposed skin, and moving around to generate internal heat.

You misunderstood me. I mean CO2 making colder regions warmer

 

[Robert W]

Yup, the debate is Over.
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

And it's looking like 2024 might beat 2023!


`

But it is not close to beating 1913.

Death Valley

The hottest place on Earth is Furnace Creek in Death Valley, California (USA), where a temperature of 56.7°C (134°F) was recorded on 10 July 1913. In summer months, Death Valley has an average daily high of 45°C (113°F).Dec 17, 2024

 

[EMH]

But it is not close to beating 1913.

Death Valley

The hottest place on Earth is Furnace Creek in Death Valley, California (USA), where a temperature of 56.7°C (134°F) was recorded on 10 July 1913. In summer months, Death Valley has an average daily high of 45°C (113°F).Dec 17, 2024

Earth not warming

 

[Robert W]

Earth not warming

For some odd reason, that makes Democrats furious.

Now if we told them GOD created all matter, that would not make them furious.
If we told them that Earth's hottest day of record was in 1913, now that will piss them off.

 

[EMH]

For some odd reason, that makes Democrats furious.

Now if we told them GOD created all matter, that would not make them furious.
If we told them that Earth's hottest day of record was in 1913, now that will piss them off.

Strongest decade for canes still the 1940s, doesn't stop Dana Bash in the debate claiming "hurricanes are increasing."

They lie.

The entire "Global Warming" is and always was a lie.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Strongest decade for canes still the 1940s, doesn't stop Dana Bash in the debate claiming "hurricanes are increasing."

They lie.

The entire "Global Warming" is and always was a lie.

It’s climate change now.
Not global warming.

 

[jc456]

But it is not close to beating 1913.

Death Valley

The hottest place on Earth is Furnace Creek in Death Valley, California (USA), where a temperature of 56.7°C (134°F) was recorded on 10 July 1913. In summer months, Death Valley has an average daily high of 45°C (113°F).Dec 17, 2024

How come it gets so hot there and not everywhere?

 

[Robert W]

How come it gets so hot there and not everywhere?

I have been in Death Valley and have studied weather and climate. Death Valley is bordered by mountains that operate like a pot on the top of a stove. There is not much plant life there. But it is shaped as I said in a fashion you can think of it as a pot.