Anti-maskers being forced to dig graves for coronavirus victims as punishment

The only place a face covering helps is in large droplet transmission. Sneezing, Coughing, etc. Even then it fails to stop the small, arosolized, viral droplets. These are the droplets that seed deep in your lungs and cause infections. Masks are less than 30% effective and then only for the person who is ill as this mask fails to stop virus inhalation around the unprotected sides of the mask.
 

What a fantastic idea. It might even educate these idiots and help them to reform their anti-social deviancy. I think it could work anywhere as a form of community service involved in any punishment.
That shouldn't take long if we are talking about those that truly died from the leftyvirus...
 
And how many of those that died were anti-maskers or got infected because they weren't wearing one? Perhaps they are at fault for their own deaths.

This is why measures like this are entirely unfair. There's no way of knowing if an anti-masker actually made anyone sick and there's no way of knowing if the infected person didn't get infected due to a lapse in practicing anti-infection protocol, such as forgetting to put gloves on at the grocery store.

This is nothing short of state-enforced moral imperative.
Its your state, your national government, you'd expect those you voted in, to make whatever policy to protect you. That's democracy.

You still have not got your head around 'Virus/Pandemic'.
The 170,000 Americans dead from Corona did not all go to Wuhan and return with it. It was spread by perhaps a few people who had come in contact with people who themselves may never have been to Wuhan but came in contact with someone who had.

Only by restricting movement, and wearing protection can the spread be brought under some control before a vaccine that must be enforced is administered.

You're arguing against a point I am not making. I am not making the point that the mask mandate is wrong or excessive, I am making the point that punishing people for the deaths - for which the state has no idea they are actually guilty of - is excessive.

If there is a government mandate to wear a mask in public then cite them for not wearing a mask if they are not wearing one. But you cannot punish them for the deaths of infected people when you have no idea how those people got infected. In essence, these anti-maskers are not being punished for their actions per se, they are being punished for an ideal.

It is the same principle by which anti-firearm people operate here in the U.S.. They don't share or identify with the ideal of gun ownership for defense or hunting or target shooting and competition so, because of the actions of a few, they wish to punish all gun owners by painting gun ownership in general as immoral. It's not so much they wish to reduce firearm deaths, they wish to destroy an ideal.

And no, it is not my intention to steer the topic to gun control. I merely use this as an example.
 
We can put that foolish women from St. George Utah on the grave digging teams.

She compared "not breathing" of George Floyd to wearing a mask.
 

What a fantastic idea. It might even educate these idiots and help them to reform their anti-social deviancy. I think it could work anywhere as a form of community service involved in any punishment.
That shouldn't take long if we are talking about those that truly died from the leftyvirus...
You mean from the Trumpvirus. Indonesia is to be commended for is excellent expansion of community service.
 
And how many of those that died were anti-maskers or got infected because they weren't wearing one? Perhaps they are at fault for their own deaths.

This is why measures like this are entirely unfair. There's no way of knowing if an anti-masker actually made anyone sick and there's no way of knowing if the infected person didn't get infected due to a lapse in practicing anti-infection protocol, such as forgetting to put gloves on at the grocery store.

This is nothing short of state-enforced moral imperative.
Its your state, your national government, you'd expect those you voted in, to make whatever policy to protect you. That's democracy.

You still have not got your head around 'Virus/Pandemic'.
The 170,000 Americans dead from Corona did not all go to Wuhan and return with it. It was spread by perhaps a few people who had come in contact with people who themselves may never have been to Wuhan but came in contact with someone who had.

Only by restricting movement, and wearing protection can the spread be brought under some control before a vaccine that must be enforced is administered.

You're arguing against a point I am not making. I am not making the point that the mask mandate is wrong or excessive, I am making the point that punishing people for the deaths - for which the state has no idea they are actually guilty of - is excessive.

If there is a government mandate to wear a mask in public then cite them for not wearing a mask if they are not wearing one. But you cannot punish them for the deaths of infected people when you have no idea how those people got infected. In essence, these anti-maskers are not being punished for their actions per se, they are being punished for an ideal.

It is the same principle by which anti-firearm people operate here in the U.S.. They don't share or identify with the ideal of gun ownership for defense or hunting or target shooting and competition so, because of the actions of a few, they wish to punish all gun owners by painting gun ownership in general as immoral. It's not so much they wish to reduce firearm deaths, they wish to destroy an ideal.

And no, it is not my intention to steer the topic to gun control. I merely use this as an example.
Don't think of it like that.
I'm sure they don't send them to prison on a single offence even in Indonesia. So it seems their serial offenders.
Prisoners are required to do all sorts of work and if authorities require them to dig graves so what?
The fact that seeing the extend of Corona can have on communities will help educate them, I see as nothing but a plus. They are criminals don't forget and have lost their right to liberty and their rights thereof.
 
And how many of those that died were anti-maskers or got infected because they weren't wearing one? Perhaps they are at fault for their own deaths.

This is why measures like this are entirely unfair. There's no way of knowing if an anti-masker actually made anyone sick and there's no way of knowing if the infected person didn't get infected due to a lapse in practicing anti-infection protocol, such as forgetting to put gloves on at the grocery store.

This is nothing short of state-enforced moral imperative.
Its your state, your national government, you'd expect those you voted in, to make whatever policy to protect you. That's democracy.

You still have not got your head around 'Virus/Pandemic'.
The 170,000 Americans dead from Corona did not all go to Wuhan and return with it. It was spread by perhaps a few people who had come in contact with people who themselves may never have been to Wuhan but came in contact with someone who had.

Only by restricting movement, and wearing protection can the spread be brought under some control before a vaccine that must be enforced is administered.

You're arguing against a point I am not making. I am not making the point that the mask mandate is wrong or excessive, I am making the point that punishing people for the deaths - for which the state has no idea they are actually guilty of - is excessive.

If there is a government mandate to wear a mask in public then cite them for not wearing a mask if they are not wearing one. But you cannot punish them for the deaths of infected people when you have no idea how those people got infected. In essence, these anti-maskers are not being punished for their actions per se, they are being punished for an ideal.

It is the same principle by which anti-firearm people operate here in the U.S.. They don't share or identify with the ideal of gun ownership for defense or hunting or target shooting and competition so, because of the actions of a few, they wish to punish all gun owners by painting gun ownership in general as immoral. It's not so much they wish to reduce firearm deaths, they wish to destroy an ideal.

And no, it is not my intention to steer the topic to gun control. I merely use this as an example.
Don't think of it like that.
I'm sure they don't send them to prison on a single offence even in Indonesia. So it seems their serial offenders.
Prisoners are required to do all sorts of work and if authorities require them to dig graves so what?
The fact that seeing the extend of Corona can have on communities will help educate them, I see as nothing but a plus. They are criminals don't forget and have lost their right to liberty and their rights thereof.
Trampling peoples rights is OK to a Marxist.... Facts be damned!
 
And how many of those that died were anti-maskers or got infected because they weren't wearing one? Perhaps they are at fault for their own deaths.

This is why measures like this are entirely unfair. There's no way of knowing if an anti-masker actually made anyone sick and there's no way of knowing if the infected person didn't get infected due to a lapse in practicing anti-infection protocol, such as forgetting to put gloves on at the grocery store.

This is nothing short of state-enforced moral imperative.
Its your state, your national government, you'd expect those you voted in, to make whatever policy to protect you. That's democracy.

You still have not got your head around 'Virus/Pandemic'.
The 170,000 Americans dead from Corona did not all go to Wuhan and return with it. It was spread by perhaps a few people who had come in contact with people who themselves may never have been to Wuhan but came in contact with someone who had.

Only by restricting movement, and wearing protection can the spread be brought under some control before a vaccine that must be enforced is administered.

You're arguing against a point I am not making. I am not making the point that the mask mandate is wrong or excessive, I am making the point that punishing people for the deaths - for which the state has no idea they are actually guilty of - is excessive.

If there is a government mandate to wear a mask in public then cite them for not wearing a mask if they are not wearing one. But you cannot punish them for the deaths of infected people when you have no idea how those people got infected. In essence, these anti-maskers are not being punished for their actions per se, they are being punished for an ideal.

It is the same principle by which anti-firearm people operate here in the U.S.. They don't share or identify with the ideal of gun ownership for defense or hunting or target shooting and competition so, because of the actions of a few, they wish to punish all gun owners by painting gun ownership in general as immoral. It's not so much they wish to reduce firearm deaths, they wish to destroy an ideal.

And no, it is not my intention to steer the topic to gun control. I merely use this as an example.
Don't think of it like that.
I'm sure they don't send them to prison on a single offence even in Indonesia. So it seems their serial offenders.
Prisoners are required to do all sorts of work and if authorities require them to dig graves so what?
The fact that seeing the extend of Corona can have on communities will help educate them, I see as nothing but a plus. They are criminals don't forget and have lost their right to liberty and their rights thereof.
Trampling peoples rights is OK to a Marxist.... Facts be damned!
There criminals for gods sake!
 
Masks do not do shit and get wet with saliva and increase the chance of the impairing the user's health.


I'm just waiting for the Legionnaire's Disease outbreaks.

And how many of those that died were anti-maskers or got infected because they weren't wearing one? Perhaps they are at fault for their own deaths.

This is why measures like this are entirely unfair. There's no way of knowing if an anti-masker actually made anyone sick and there's no way of knowing if the infected person didn't get infected due to a lapse in practicing anti-infection protocol, such as forgetting to put gloves on at the grocery store.

This is nothing short of state-enforced moral imperative.
Its your state, your national government, you'd expect those you voted in, to make whatever policy to protect you. That's democracy.

You still have not got your head around 'Virus/Pandemic'.
The 170,000 Americans dead from Corona did not all go to Wuhan and return with it. It was spread by perhaps a few people who had come in contact with people who themselves may never have been to Wuhan but came in contact with someone who had.

Only by restricting movement, and wearing protection can the spread be brought under some control before a vaccine that must be enforced is administered.

You're arguing against a point I am not making. I am not making the point that the mask mandate is wrong or excessive, I am making the point that punishing people for the deaths - for which the state has no idea they are actually guilty of - is excessive.

If there is a government mandate to wear a mask in public then cite them for not wearing a mask if they are not wearing one. But you cannot punish them for the deaths of infected people when you have no idea how those people got infected. In essence, these anti-maskers are not being punished for their actions per se, they are being punished for an ideal.

It is the same principle by which anti-firearm people operate here in the U.S.. They don't share or identify with the ideal of gun ownership for defense or hunting or target shooting and competition so, because of the actions of a few, they wish to punish all gun owners by painting gun ownership in general as immoral. It's not so much they wish to reduce firearm deaths, they wish to destroy an ideal.

And no, it is not my intention to steer the topic to gun control. I merely use this as an example.
Don't think of it like that.
I'm sure they don't send them to prison on a single offence even in Indonesia. So it seems their serial offenders.
Prisoners are required to do all sorts of work and if authorities require them to dig graves so what?
The fact that seeing the extend of Corona can have on communities will help educate them, I see as nothing but a plus. They are criminals don't forget and have lost their right to liberty and their rights thereof.
Trampling peoples rights is OK to a Marxist.... Facts be damned!
People who refuse to obey the laws in a We the People republican representative constitutional democracy are the equivalent of marxists of the left and authoritarians of the right
 
Forcing people to dig graves is STUPID but serves the purpose of socalist [sic] control mongers in socalist [sic] governments...

I think it is obvious to anyone who hasn't drunk deeply of the totalitarian Flavor Aid, that one primary motive behind the #CoronaHoax2020, was to give criminals in government an excuse to seize more and more power, and to impose more and more unrighteous dominion over the lives and activities of the people over whom they wish to rule.

In spite of their attempts to paint this as being in any way about protecting anyone's health, you can see it in both Tainted Tommy's and Oz and the Orchestra's posts here, in this thread, that what they are truly interested in has nothing to do with fighting any alleged disease, but with having government impose more and more control over the people. Both of them have even made blatantly-Orwellian uses of the word “freedom”, in order to justify destroying it under the guise of protecting it.

This is about freedom and the deep states efforts to curtail your right to doe [sic] and your right to kill your neighbours.
In the case of a Pandemic your freedom depends on everybody complying with the law getting vacinated [sic] (when it comes) & wearing a face mask. All governments first duty is to protect its people, its people must comply - we are all at war with this virus.

…or, as Orwell put it…

“War is peace!”
“Freedom of slavery!”
“Ignorance is strength!”
 
People who refuse to obey the laws in a We the People republican representative constitutional democracy are the equivalent of marxists of the left and authoritarians of the right

You do realize, of course, that here in the United States, the Constitution is the highest law; and that it explicitly affirms certain rights,and prohibits government from violating these rights. Among these rights are freedom of assembly and freedom of religion—rights which, in many jurisdictions, governments are blatantly violating under the guise of the #CoronaHoax2020.

Here, in California, you can now be considered and treated as a criminal for going to church.

Now who are the real criminals here—those who dare to exercise their explicitly-affirmed Constitutional rights; or the subhuman pieces of shit who are abusing government power in order to violate these rights, in blatant violation of this nation's highest law?
 
Yes I know that you hate our republican representative government and our Constitution.
You are so full of shit your breath stinks. You are also lying. Get some new material, stupidbot.
,
You are now spamming. We the Peope rule through our elected legislatures. If you won't comply, then you are not a true American working for the good of all of us. Talking nonsense makes you look foolish and does not contribute to the discussion.
 
If Osama bin Laden were alive today, he would be grinning from ear to ear and cheering on the anti-maskers. They are playing a major role in piling up more dead Western bodies than he could ever dream of doing. Al Quada and ISIS love this. They don't have to do anything. Just sit back, have their tea, and watch while the Western infidels kill off their own kind. In the name of "freedom," of course.
 

Forum List

Back
Top