Another story for trump fans to dismiss.

[Nostra]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

OH NOS!

An anonymous guy claims someone said something.

IMPEACH!


You clowns are getting funnier every day. Such desperation.

Thread fail!

 

[Independent thinker]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

You've got four more years buddy. I can't see you making it.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

They know what they're doing is illegal and unconstitutional and they don't care.

This is a lawless, criminal administration.

 

[berg80]

You've got four more years buddy. I can't see you making it.

You've got 3 1/2 more years of ignoring evidence of corruption, illegality, and the nomination of law breakers for positions of power.

I see you making with ease since you have so much practice.

 

[Nostra]

You've got 3 1/2 more years of ignoring evidence of corruption, illegality, and the nomination of law breakers for positions of power.

I see you making with ease since you have so much practice.

Where is the corruption here, Simp?

You have someone claiming someone said something. Is the First Amendment corruption now in your whackadoodle world?

 

[Independent thinker]

You've got 3 1/2 more years of ignoring evidence of corruption, illegality, and the nomination of law breakers for positions of power.

I see you making with ease since you have so much practice.

Well, at least you admit you've got almost four more years to go.

 

[j-mac]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

Another Democrat sabatour

 

[jc456]

suggested isn't ignoring

 

[Scoutster]

I have no interest in reading anything from any claimed unnamed source as “proof”of anything.

 

[80zephyr]

This bothers you. But the lawfare being used to force people to even consider alternatives does not?

Figures.

 

[Mac1958]

That is what the corruption of the DoJ looks like.

Well, the DOJ was formerly a proud member of the Deep State, because parts of it tried to hold Trump accountable.

But now that Trump is in office, any corruption doesn't matter. It's all better now.

Stuff is so simple in MAGA World™.

 

[Rawley]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

Erez Reuveni LOL

 

[berg80]

They know what they're doing is illegal and unconstitutional and they don't care.

This is a lawless, criminal administration.

That sentence is correct in a number on contexts. "They" could mean The Following with "they're" referring to the regime.

 

[scruffy]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

So what.

I suggested ignoring the court order too.

No big deal.

 

[Rawley]

I have no interest in reading anything from any claimed unnamed source as “proof”of anything.

He was named. Erez Reuveni, the DOJ lawyer that was fired for tanking the deportation of the wife beating, human smuggling terrorist

 

[g5000]

Whistleblower says top DOJ official suggested ignoring court orders on deportations

A top official at the Justice Department told subordinates they would need to consider ignoring court orders the day before the administration carried out deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, according to a department whistleblower.

In a letter sent to Congress by his attorneys, Erez Reuveni said he and others were told by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove in very blunt terms that they might have to defy court orders.

Bove told attendees of the March 14 meeting that President Donald Trump would soon be invoking the Alien Enemies Act and that deportations would be carried out that weekend.

"Bove indicated these removals were a priority for the administration and stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what," according to the letter from Reuveni's attorneys at the Government Accountability Project. A copy of the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times, was obtained by NBC News.

"Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to the letter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...suggested-ignoring-court-orders-de-rcna214763

We all know who Bove is, right? trump's former defense attorney who was involved in the purge of DoJ and FBI officials who were part of the criminal investigations in to Don.

“The public servants the Department is seeking to remove properly fulfilled their oath to uphold and defend the rule of law. As with any civil servant, FBI employees are afforded statutory and constitutional rights. Therefore, any adverse employment action, including removal, must respect all required standard procedural and substantive due process protections,” attorneys wrote in a letter to Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney who is now the DOJ’s acting deputy attorney general.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5124328-trump-administration-purge-fbi/

The question I would ask before the replies of "just a disgruntled guy seeking revenge" come in from defenders of all things Don is.......does what the whistleblower is alleging sound credible? Given all we know, especially considering court orders were in fact ignored and Bove has shown himself to be a loyalist supreme, should what Reuveni has alleged be taken seriously?

Moreover, and this should go without saying, what does it say about trump that he would nominate someone like Bove, a man credibly accused of recommending that court orders be ignored, to the federal bench?

Just one more Article of Impeachment when the Dems take over the House.

 

[g5000]

So what.

I suggested ignoring the court order too.

No big deal.

Because you are a fascist who hates the Constitution, of course.

I know and you know you would be screaming like a *****, and bleeding from every opening in your body, if Biden did something like that.

 

[Moonglow]

When Dems lose we see they have ZERO respect for elections, the will of the voters, the Constitution or democracy. They lost in a clear decisive defeat so they run to hack Dem shill judges to try to stall the American people and the president they elected.

Federal district courts have intervened in several Biden administration policies, primarily through issuing injunctions that temporarily halt or block the implementation of rules while legal challenges are resolved.
Here are some examples of Biden policies that have faced intervention from federal district courts:

• Asylum Restrictions: A federal district court in the District of Columbia struck down key parts of a Biden-era rule that severely restricted asylum eligibility, finding it violated the Immigration and Nationality Act. The court also found the rule's departure from established policy regarding asking about fear of persecution before deportation "arbitrary and capricious".
• Protection for Undocumented Spouses: A federal judge struck down a policy aimed at protecting undocumented individuals married to US citizens from deportation. This policy, known as "parole in place," aimed to provide a pathway to legal status and work authorization for an estimated 750,000 to 800,000 individuals.
• Immigration Enforcement Priorities: While a district court ruled against Biden administration immigration enforcement priorities in the case Texas v. the Biden Administration, the Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the lawsuit, finding the states lacked standing to challenge the guidelines.
• Title IX Regulations: Several federal district courts have issued injunctions blocking the implementation of a new Title IX regulation that included protections for transgender students. These injunctions were upheld by two federal appeals courts, resulting in a patchwork of enforcement across the nation.
• Student Debt Relief: While not a district court intervention in this instance, the Supreme Court blocked a key part of the Biden administration's student debt relief plan known as the SAVE plan, based on an earlier ruling from a federal appeals court.

In summary, federal district courts have played a significant role in challenging and sometimes temporarily halting the implementation of Biden administration policies, often focusing on areas such as immigration, education, and social programs

 

[berg80]

Well, the DOJ was formerly a proud member of the Deep State, because parts of it tried to hold Trump accountable.

But now that Trump is in office, any corruption doesn't matter. It's all better now.

Stuff is so simple in MAGA World™.

Right. The heretics, the ones espousing wrong think (meaning adherence to the law), must be purged. The way must be cleared for the glorious remaking of America in the image of Dear Leader. The convicted criminal who raped E. Jean Carroll, defied a subpoena for classified docs he stole, and orchestrated a failed, bloodless coup.

 

[berg80]

The larger picture reveals a trump loyalist nominated for the federal bench after himself demanding DoJ officials violate the law.

It's the essence of trumpery.