Another example of why you shouldnt pay attention to fauci

[Nostra]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

 

[TNHarley]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

No shit! I literally just agreed with you.
Trump did not have to use fauci. But he did. He CHOSE him. He could have used other people for advise and conferences but he didnt. He was fucking blasting him then giving him talk time in the same breath. It was hilarious!

 

[Nostra]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

No shit! I literally just agreed with you.
Trump did not have to use fauci. But he did. He CHOSE him. He could have used other people for advise and conferences but he didnt. He was fucking blasting him then giving him talk time in the same breath. It was hilarious!

Who should a President use for advice during a pandemic? The Attorney General?

 

[Rigby5]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

No shit! I literally just agreed with you.
Trump did not have to use fauci. But he did. He CHOSE him. He could have used other people for advise and conferences but he didnt. He was fucking blasting him then giving him talk time in the same breath. It was hilarious!

Yah, I do not know why Trump did that?
Fauci started out ok, but then went with the foolish "flattening the curve" thing, which can not ever work.
I assume Trump was either too unsure, hedging his bets, appeasing others, or something.
But clearly Fauci was wrong and screwed things up.
Even Fauci admitted that flattening the curve increases the area under the curve, (death total).

 

[Rigby5]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

No shit! I literally just agreed with you.
Trump did not have to use fauci. But he did. He CHOSE him. He could have used other people for advise and conferences but he didnt. He was fucking blasting him then giving him talk time in the same breath. It was hilarious!

Who should a President use for advice during a pandemic? The Attorney General?

I would talk to many doctors and not a bureaucrat over paid almost half a million.
But to be fair to Fauci, the rest of the world also screwed up and tried to "flatten the curve".
Why I don't know, since every doctor should understand how herd immunity works, and if lethality is too high, that then you use quarantine instead. There is never any time you should "flatten the curve".

 

[jc456]

they own the data, and they changed their numbers in December

Prove it. Prove they changed the numbers.

PolitiFact | Chart comparing 2020 US death toll with previous years is flawed, uses incomplete data

One could pull the data for daily death counts along with "US deaths per year ", as discussed in the link I provided.

I just tried again to pull the data for both and do not get the same pull from back in earlier in the year. they changed their charts.

 

[colfax_m]

I just tried again to pull the data for both and do not get the same pull from back in earlier in the year. they changed their charts.

Prove it.

 

[jc456]

I just tried again to pull the data for both and do not get the same pull from back in earlier in the year. they changed their charts.

Prove it.

prove it was there? I did. gave the link. It's not there now. proved.

 

[colfax_m]

prove it was there? I did. gave the link. It's not there now. proved.

Prove it was ever there in the first place.

 

[AntonToo]

Trump will hire the best people
Lol

The dumbass has been at the NIH since 1968, Stupid.

Trump didn’t hire him.

Thats a weak excuse. Even for you cultists.

It's not an excuse, it is exposing your ignorance.

HTH

No it doesnt..

Yep. You thought Trump hired Fauci when the little weasel has been at NIH since 1968.

I know that. He chose to use fauci. He could have hired anyone. But he CHOSE fauci

FAuci was running the NIH when Trump took office, Stupid. He didn't hire him for anything.

No shit! I literally just agreed with you.
Trump did not have to use fauci. But he did. He CHOSE him. He could have used other people for advise and conferences but he didnt. He was fucking blasting him then giving him talk time in the same breath. It was hilarious!

Who should a President use for advice during a pandemic? The Attorney General?

I would talk to many doctors and not a bureaucrat over paid almost half a million.
But to be fair to Fauci, the rest of the world also screwed up and tried to "flatten the curve".
Why I don't know, since every doctor should understand how herd immunity works, and if lethality is too high, that then you use quarantine instead. There is never any time you should "flatten the curve".

You obviously have very limited access to infectious desease specialists. Limited to some quack probably.

Trying to get everyone infected to end a pandemic asap is fringe horsecrap.

 

[martybegan]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

 

[my2¢]

The only people I listen to regarding my medical decisions are my wife and doctor. And anything my wife says I'll run past my doctor on my next annual physical.

 

[colfax_m]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

 

[martybegan]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

Nope, it's calling you what you are, how you respond to it is up to you. If you lack the spine to stand up for your beliefs that isn't my concern. In no way am I attempting to silence you, that is a lie and I demand you retract said statement.

It meant something specific, and SJW's like you didn't like it so you decided to try to change it.

 

[colfax_m]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

Nope, it's calling you what you are, how you respond to it is up to you. If you lack the spine to stand up for your beliefs that isn't my concern. In no way am I attempting to silence you, that is a lie and I demand you retract said statement.

It meant something specific, and SJW's like you didn't like it so you decided to try to change it.

No, it’s being belligerent for the sake of being belligerent.

I’ve stood up for my beliefs, you’re the one who attacks me for doing so. You aren’t displaying the behavior of someone who is confident, but of someone who is too insecure to have someone else challenge them.

Which makes you a snowflake.

You don’t know the first thing about what snowflake meant. You’re just making shut up.

 

[martybegan]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

Nope, it's calling you what you are, how you respond to it is up to you. If you lack the spine to stand up for your beliefs that isn't my concern. In no way am I attempting to silence you, that is a lie and I demand you retract said statement.

It meant something specific, and SJW's like you didn't like it so you decided to try to change it.

No, it’s being belligerent for the sake of being belligerent.

I’ve stood up for my beliefs, you’re the one who attacks me for doing so. You aren’t displaying the behavior of someone who is confident, but of someone who is too insecure to have someone else challenge them.

Which makes you a snowflake.

You don’t know the first thing about what snowflake meant. You’re just making shut up.

And?

If your beliefs are strong, any attack should wash off you like water. If not, then it's time to question your fortitude.

You keep thinking you can adjust a word to suit your need, but it only works in your dime store head.

 

[colfax_m]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

Nope, it's calling you what you are, how you respond to it is up to you. If you lack the spine to stand up for your beliefs that isn't my concern. In no way am I attempting to silence you, that is a lie and I demand you retract said statement.

It meant something specific, and SJW's like you didn't like it so you decided to try to change it.

No, it’s being belligerent for the sake of being belligerent.

I’ve stood up for my beliefs, you’re the one who attacks me for doing so. You aren’t displaying the behavior of someone who is confident, but of someone who is too insecure to have someone else challenge them.

Which makes you a snowflake.

You don’t know the first thing about what snowflake meant. You’re just making shut up.

And?

If your beliefs are strong, any attack should wash off you like water. If not, then it's time to question your fortitude.

You keep thinking you can adjust a word to suit your need, but it only works in your dime store head.

That’s why I don’t respond to your vile rhetoric in kind.

You keep thinking someone made you the authority on what words mean.

 

[martybegan]

I have an issue with people using a word wrong and ignoring reality, you are doing both.

You don't seem to have that issue, it makes you the typical SJW, believing reality can be changed via your whims and feelings.

A simple disagreement on the definition of a word turns you into a raging, slobbering nut case.

You’re so delicate. So fragile.

Like a snowflake.

Bending reality is what Trump and his devotees do. You’ve done it over and over again.

Again using the term wrong. Snowflakes wouldn't be back again and again.

All part of the package you earned by being a SJW loser.

Yes, coming from the side that believes if a guy tucks and wears a dress he has to be treated as a woman OR ELSE, accusations of reality bending are comical.

I’m not. Snowflakes cannot be told they’re wrong. They’re special and have to be treated like it. Attempting to correct them results in the spasms of profanity that you’ve displayed.

Losers like you want to be treated one way and then go ahead and treat everyone else poorly. You want people to respect your opinions while you shit on others.

Stubborn assholes can't be told they are wrong. I am not denying that label. Snowflakes run from opposing opinions and try to get others to silence said opposing opinions. You just seem fixed on using the term because like most progressives, the only play you have is accusing your opposites of your own faults and weaknesses.

Feel free to dish on me to your heart's content. Soi boi bleatings from your type do nothing but feed me.

There’s the irony. You’re stubborn, but the way you react to being told you’re wrong is that of a snowflake.

“A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others.”

Urban Dictionary: Snowflake

A very sensitive person. Someone who is easily hurt or offended by the statements or actions of others. This has nothing to do with politics. Snowflakes can be liberal or conservative. Whether it is a compliment or an insult is a matter of opinion and depends on the context.

www.urbandictionary.com

I use the term and it’s apt. You don’t get to change the definition simply because you can’t accept that your behavior is that of a snowflake. It’s be too much for your ego to bear.

LOL urban dictionary, an editable mass page based on upvotes and downvotes.

The 3rd definition, with a like to dislike ratio of 3 to 1 as opposed to yours of 4 to 1.

A hypersensitive, irrational person who can't stand to have their world views challenged, or be offended in any perceived or even slightest of ways; they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc. They often live in an echo chamber of their own beliefs and surround themselves exclusively with people and opinions that agree with their own. This term is most often use to describe people left-leaning people, but can be applied both left and right wing people.
I told that snowflake that I respectfully disagree and had some questions, and she started screaming that I was a nazi.
John Doe saw that I agreed with Jane Doe on an issue, and he blocked me; I never knew he was so petty snowflake.

Again, a snowflake doesn't keep coming back to the fight.

From your definition: they will have any number of emotional reactions: impuning character and/or motives, blocking on social media, shouting, interrupting, threatening, assaulting, etc

You do all these except blocking.

You lose.

How does one interrupt or assault on a message board?

And all those may be qualities of "snowflakes", but all people with those qualities are not necessarily snowflakes because of other requirements.

The old "all apples are fruits, but not all fruits are apples" problem.

You’re inventing “requirements” that don’t exist because you don’t want admit you’re a snowflake.

Marty, you are the thing you claim to hate. An emotionally fragile snowflake.

Again, you are using the term wrong in some pathetic desire to think you are actually "getting" me.

I continue to factually point out your wrong use of the term, but you think you have a "gotcha" moment, and hang on for dear life.

Pathetic actually.

I wasn’t aware that you were the person that defined words for society.

I do appreciate how you don’t attempt to pretend as is you aren’t emotionally fragile though. You wouldn’t respond so violently to my use of the word if you weren’t a snowflake.

I'm following the context of what the word means to most people who see it, not your attempted definition gotcha moment.

Anger in the face of tyrannical assholes is not a vice.

You’re anger is a substitute for intelligence. If you can’t outsmart them, attempt to silence them by harassment.

That’s a snowflake response.

Your opinion on how people use the word is incorrect.

Anger and intelligence are not mutually exclusive.

Please tell me how I am attempting to silence you in any way.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

My view on what the word's original intent was is 100% accurate. SJW's like you didn't like it so like with everything else you just make shit up and pretend it's reality.

Verbal harassment, trolling, generally being a belligerent asshole are intended to silence.

As you said, you’re attempting to “put me in my place”.

My place is observing your behavior, learning how someone like yourself perceives the world.

The word’s original intent? Jesus fucking Christ Marty. What do you think you’re talking about here? You’re not reading a Rosetta Stone. It’s fucking slang and someone as old and demented as you wouldn’t know the first thing about it.

Nope, it's calling you what you are, how you respond to it is up to you. If you lack the spine to stand up for your beliefs that isn't my concern. In no way am I attempting to silence you, that is a lie and I demand you retract said statement.

It meant something specific, and SJW's like you didn't like it so you decided to try to change it.

No, it’s being belligerent for the sake of being belligerent.

I’ve stood up for my beliefs, you’re the one who attacks me for doing so. You aren’t displaying the behavior of someone who is confident, but of someone who is too insecure to have someone else challenge them.

Which makes you a snowflake.

You don’t know the first thing about what snowflake meant. You’re just making shut up.

And?

If your beliefs are strong, any attack should wash off you like water. If not, then it's time to question your fortitude.

You keep thinking you can adjust a word to suit your need, but it only works in your dime store head.

That’s why I don’t respond to your vile rhetoric in kind.

You keep thinking someone made you the authority on what words mean.

That's on you.

Words mean things. Snowflake means someone who can't bear opposing opinions and melts away from them. it doesn't mean someone like me who thinks you are a SJW twat and calls you out on it, over and over and over.

 

[Nostra]

colfax_m is giving Fed employees 4 months of paid vacation if they babysit his illegal aliens from his surge at the border a radical left wing policy or not?

Let‘s see if you have an once of credibility

colfax_m

:cricket : from colfax_m

 

[Nostra]

colfax_m is this radical left wing lunacy, of infrastructure?


The proposal includes $20 billion to advance racial equity and environmental justice.

colfax_m

:crickets : from colfax_m