Another child sues for being sexually mutilated by the Left

I'm talking about the long-term effects of such surgery done on children. Sure, there are some who now feel better about themselves, but this is relatively new and we are starting to see some very dissatisfied people who don't feel any better about themselves, but now have mutilated bodies on top of their other issues.
Detransitioners appear to be small minority of transitioners but it is a problem when misdiagnosis leads to poor care. That happens in all parts of medicine.
 
Now you're trying to veer off into a rant on the Catholic Church, which has nothing to do with the current PC fad of making young boys look like girls and vice versa. Isn't it interesting that the PC crowd is now agreeing with something the Catholic Church (and others at the time) practiced hundreds of years ago? Dare we say the Church was just ahead of its time?
Sexual mutilation of children for bizarre social reasons isn't exactly something new. Though I'm sure we'd like to think we're past that.
 

How many more children must suffer, and how many will try and take their own lives after the mutilation?

A de-transitioned teen is suing a hospital system over doctors removing her breasts when she was only 13 years old.

Layla Jane is an 18-year-old biological female who began to identify as transgender at age 11. Jane desired to transition to a male at that time. Initially, doctors at the Kaiser Permanente hospital system denied her transition hormones until she turned 16 years old. However, doctors quickly changed course and approved Jane for cross-sex hormones. At age 12, Jane was put through the "torment" of testosterone hormones and puberty blockers.

At age 13, doctors approved and carried out a double mastectomy on Jane.

Jane wrote on Twitter, "Mind boggling to me that a doctor signed off on a double mastectomy for me before I had taken a sex ed course. I barely started 8th grade, I was 13."

The letter of intent to sue accused the doctors of approving the breast-removal surgery "without performing an adequate evaluation and treatment of Layla’s extensive mental health co-morbidities."

The letter from her attorneys at LiMandri and Jonna LLP claimed that Jane suffers from anxiety, depression, pubertal struggles, body dysmorphia, and serious self-image concerns.

"These doctors also pushed Layla and her parents down this transition path engaging in intentional, malicious, and oppressive concealment of important information and false representations," the letter stated.

The lawsuit against Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals also accused the hospital system of "intentional fraud and concealment."

The lawsuit claimed that doctors warned that Jane would have an increased risk of suicide unless she transitioned. Doctors allegedly gave Jane's parents the binary option of a "live son" or a "dead daughter."

The lawsuit is calling for unspecified financial damages related to health issues related to the transition from ages 12 to 17. The lawsuit listed Jane as suffering from permanent irreversible mutilation, an induced state of endocrine disease, an increased risk of being infertile, and will never be able to breastfeed a child.

During an appearance on Fox News with her attorney Harmeet Dhillon, Jane said, "I don't think I'm better off for the experience, and I think transition just completely added fuel to the fire that was my pre-existing conditions."

Dhillon is also representing Chloe Cole – another California teen de-transitioner who sued Kaiser Permanente hospital system last month. Cole had her breasts removed when she was only 15 years old.

Kaiser issued a statement saying that its doctors "practice compassionate, evidence-based medicine founded on sound research and best medical practices."


"When adolescent patients, with parental support, seek gender-affirming care, the patient's care team carefully evaluates their treatment options," Kaiser spokesman Marc Brown said. "The care decisions always rest with the patient and their parents, and, in every case, we respect the patients and their families' informed decisions about their personal health."

Once enough of them sue and hospitals are forced to pay then they will stop this stupid shit.

This should never been done until the person involved is trusted enough to legally drink a fucking beer.
 
Detransitioners appear to be small minority of transitioners but it is a problem when misdiagnosis leads to poor care. That happens in all parts of medicine.

Simple solution, do not do this shit to kids. If a person cannot be trusted to drink a beer legally they should not be trusted to make this sort of a decision.
 
I don't see why it's malpractice. The kid, and her parents, ask the doctor to cut her tits off. It worked. Where's the malpractice?

The doctor should have known better.

If you asked a doctor to cut off your leg because it was itchy, they should say no.
 
Don't allow anyone under 18 to transform. That would solve a lot of it.
Why 18? Product purchases of tobacco and firearms are trending towards 21 years of age and alcohol is already there. Why wouldn't the age restriction follow these precedents?

Does this really solve the problem?
 
Another time we'll agree

:beer:

Some things are just basic common sense.

13 year old...Can I have a beer....No you are mature enough to do such a thing.

Same 13 year old....can I cut off my tits/dick....sure, let me do that for you!


I mean, what the living fuck.
 
Detransitioners appear to be small minority of transitioners but it is a problem when misdiagnosis leads to poor care. That happens in all parts of medicine.
And after they become adults, they are free to make that decision for themselves. I still say if they're too young to get a tattoo, they're too young to feminize or masculinize their bodies.
 
Simple solution, do not do this shit to kids. If a person cannot be trusted to drink a beer legally they should not be trusted to make this sort of a decision.
Then you are discounting the experiences of adolescents for whom this care helps.
 
And after they become adults, they are free to make that decision for themselves. I still say if they're too young to get a tattoo, they're too young to feminize or masculinize their bodies.
They aren't making these decisions on their own they are making them with their parents and guardians. Is your argument that parents and children shouldn't be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions?
 
Once enough of them sue and hospitals are forced to pay then they will stop this stupid shit.

This should never been done until the person involved is trusted enough to legally drink a fucking beer.
I don't think so. Some things are more important than money, like DNC power.

DNC ideology rules with a fist of iron.

Just look at how they are destroying the economy, no one cares.

You watch, the lemmings will all run to reelect them.
 
I don't think so. Some things are more important than money, like DNC power.

DNC ideology rules with a fist of iron.

Just look at how they are destroying the economy, no one cares.

You watch, the lemmings will all run to reelect them.

This is not about a political party no matter how much you want it to be.
 
That is just fucking stupid. There is a reason we do not let 13 year olds make life altering decisions on a normal basis

I agree her probable personal decision was stupid.

What Moonglow never answered was she fully educated by the doctors of the ramifications of her decision before they operated on her.
 

Forum List

Back
Top