JustAGuy1
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2019
- 16,900
- 14,817
- 2,290
Resurrection = Second Coming
Horse Hockey. That's most ridiculous thing anyone has ever said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Resurrection = Second Coming
Horse Hockey. That's most ridiculous thing anyone has ever said.
There were those in the 1st century tha taught there was only "1" resurrection, Paul found it strange that some in Corinth were claiming there was no resurrection at all.....this type of uninspired gossip spread among a few of the early churches. Paul had to tell some Thessalonias not to grieve over those who died in the faith (1 Thess. 4:13-14). "Hymeneus and Philetus" were teaching that the resurrection had already happened, over and done with (2 Tim.2:17-18).
Thankfully......the concept that there will be no other resurrection is a false ideology and is easily proven in scripture to be false. Its true Christ was rescurrected as the First Fruit (the first harvast) of those who have already died (Acts 26:23, Col. 1:18, Rev. 1:5). It was through one man that death came upon all men, entered the world (Adam). It is also true that by one man, Jesus, that life was returned to the dead (John 11:25, Romans 5:12-19).
The resurrections must take place in order........the term is a military term dealing with marching in ranks with order. Christ was the first....THE REST WILL BE RESURRECTED AT THE RETURN OF CHRIST (John 5:28-29, 1 Thess. 4:16, Col. 3:4). Its at this point comes the end........the final judgment.
Jesus will return the Kingdom and the autority given to Him by the Father.....Jesus will return the authority back to God. (Matthew 28:19, 1 Cor. 15:23-24)
All that Jesus ruled over will have been conquered by the time of the "resurrection" and judgment. (Luke 19:27, Col. 1:20, Phil. 2:10-11, 3:21). The very last thing that will be conquered will be death itself (Hosea 13:14, 2 Tim. 1:10, Heb. 2:14, Rev. 20:14). The implication is that Jesus is STILL RULING as we speak............and will be until He returns to judge the quick and the dead.
Nope. How did you learn about your doctrine? We're you baptized when you were born again?
Allow me to be frank, you folks are whacked and you have no real knowledge of Scripture.
Do any DNA-carrying descendants of Shem still roam the earth? Does anyone today claim any of Jacob's DNA? If any Semites or Israelites exist today, they're suspiciously quiet.the idea that the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD \ marked the END OF JUDAISM is a roman catholic
conceit-----thus the notion that the book of
revulsions is "history" contemporary to that event
As I recall, your understanding of the NT is quite biased and distorted.where in the NT are ROME AND JESUS "allies"?
In fact the notion of a "roman jesus" is roman
catholic, VERY STRAINED, sophistry
I asked you a question. Where did your beliefs come from? They appear to be straight out of the Moody Institute.
I don't care what you've asked. Virtually NOBODY teaches that the Resurrection was His second coming. No true Christian anyway. We both know I know about Scripture as written than you do
You know what fundamentalists teach. The Moody institute is based on the vision of a teenager in the 1830s.
Nobody but you talks about Moody, Schofield and Lindsay and then you only use it to imply that you are a superior being. You have twisted and changed the Scriptures so badly that you have forgotten who Christ really is.
norwegen
I asked you where you learned the Scofield heresy? There's no mention of Jesus in the old testament.. most specifically in Hosea and Isaiah. Jeremiah and Zechariah aren't talking about Jesus either.
Do you honestly think that you can side track me by posting an off topic reply? Go back to school Margot, will never work with me. Focus. Jut in case you forgot were talking about how the Resurrection was not the second coming. I hope that helps. You do realize that Norwegen's opinion mean nothing to me, right?
JustAGuy1
The messiah of the old testament is an anointed Jewish king like King David.
Messiah | Definition, History, & Facts
Messiah, in Judaism, the expected king of the Davidic line who would deliver Israel from foreign bondage and restore the glories of its golden age. More loosely, the term denotes any redeemer figure; and the adjective messianic is used to refer to beliefs about an eschatological improvement of...www.britannica.com
Any "resurrection" in relation to Christianity, save "one"..........Jesus' resurrection are spiritual resurrections, as the flesh goes back to the earth from which it came and the spirit goes back to God from which it came (Eccl. 12:7), to be judged according to Word that has been revealed over a 3500 year period. The Flesh of the Christ, as prophesied will not see corruption, Jesus body was resurrected with spirit intact. (Acts 2:29-31).Isn't that spiritual rather than in the flesh?
You are VERY confused. You are PROJECTING yourDo any DNA-carrying descendants of Shem still roam the earth? Does anyone today claim any of Jacob's DNA? If any Semites or Israelites exist today, they're suspiciously quiet.
The rabbinic and Talmudic Judaism of today is not the Judaism that ended circa AD 70. I'm not sure why this is so hard to grasp.
The age that ended was the age of the temple, of the Law, of the tribes, the priesthood, the elements, etc. And guess what. This narrative didn't begin with the Roman Catholics; it began with the gospels.
I'm not educated. Never been to seminary; never considered pursuing a divinity degree.I know... norwegen is educated.
Where did you learn about the Bible?
I'm not educated. Never been to seminary; never considered pursuing a divinity degree.
I'm no authority, and so welcome debate.
the idea that "god" begat a pregnancy is based onYou know what fundamentalists teach. The Moody institute is based on the vision of a teenager in the 1830s.