An Arctic 'Report Card' from NOAA

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
27,874
5,290
290
N/A
Yes, yes, yes. NOAA admits that it got everything wrong. That the Arctic is in great shape and is quickly growing back to its frigid, icy old self.


NOT

Report Card
 
You keep parroting that insipid drivel as if it will be true eventually, just like you are programmed to.

Imbecile.


jnV0QVv.gif
 
Yes, yes, yes. NOAA admits that it got everything wrong. That the Arctic is in great shape and is quickly growing back to its frigid, icy old self.


NOT

Report Card
You really believe any con could care about the future? They only know of today and yesterday cause tomorrow hasn't come.
 
Yes, yes, yes. NOAA admits that it got everything wrong. That the Arctic is in great shape and is quickly growing back to its frigid, icy old self.


NOT

Report Card
You really believe any con could care about the future? They only know of today and yesterday cause tomorrow hasn't come.

Lol....what shit costs never matters to you people. If it's even just remotely plausible, throw $ at it!:2up:

Never let a progressive anywhere near your checkbook. If we let them have at it, within a couple of years there would be no such thing as western civilization as we know it. As Trump would say, "It'd be one huge shithole!"
 
The nations Trump identified as shitholes are run far more like HE tries to run this nation than as a liberal government would run it.

The Arctic is in bad shape. The recovery you fools keep claiming is a complete fantasy. The odds are high that we will have an ice-free Arctic summer before 2030. The accelerating Greenland ice melt coupled with the destabilized WAIS spells "RISING SEAS".
 
The nations Trump identified as shitholes are run far more like HE tries to run this nation than as a liberal government would run it.

The Arctic is in bad shape. The recovery you fools keep claiming is a complete fantasy. The odds are high that we will have an ice-free Arctic summer before 2030. The accelerating Greenland ice melt coupled with the destabilized WAIS spells "RISING SEAS".

Q. By how much must we lower CO2 in order to stabilize the Arctic?

A. $78,000,000,000,000
 
The nations Trump identified as shitholes are run far more like HE tries to run this nation than as a liberal government would run it.

The Arctic is in bad shape. The recovery you fools keep claiming is a complete fantasy. The odds are high that we will have an ice-free Arctic summer before 2030. The accelerating Greenland ice melt coupled with the destabilized WAIS spells "RISING SEAS".
Snow in England is a "thing of the past" too
 
You must realize how puerile and meaningless are the arguments you bring forward.

I think the odds are very high that we will fail to take the required action. The world of my children and their children and their children will be royally fucked by ignorant, inconsiderate, self-centered, short-sighted assholes like you Frank. It will cost a thousand times as much as you ever worried about spending to hold it off. You and yours will go down in human history as the lowest of the low. Make sure you leave a note for your great grandchildren explaining why you took the positions you took. Because they will really, really wonder what could possibly have driven you to act with such incredibly extreme irresponsibility.
 
You can control the climate of entire planet with just a few CO2 molecules, yet you deny there's a Creator.
 
Government grants are the most insidious method ever devised to gain alleged "scientific" information. If the price is right the grantee will bend over backward to keep the funding. University types will ignore adverse evidence and create a scenario that tends to support whatever the grant pays for until it runs out.
 
gfs_nh-sat1_t2anom_1-day.png


Climate Reanalyzer

Arctic, Canada, and Greenland quite warm for this time of year.

Again -- with the "RE-analyzer" shit???

From UAH data using ARCTIC ONLY...

2018 08 +0.09
2018 09 +0.21
2018 10 +1.11
2018 11 +0.69

Even using the 20th century avg rather than the Satellite era avg to GET the anomaly number would only bias those numbers up by about 0.5Deg...

You're looking at weather. And ONLY the climate reanalzer's PROJECTED temperatures using their modeling and their initial conditions and parameters.

The normal daily variance in the Arctic is the HIGHEST on the globe. My variance in early winter in Tenn is about +/- 6 or 8 degF. In the ARCTIC it's somewhere around +/- 10 or 12 degF on a daily basis during that period. In the DEAD of winter when it hardly gets near unfreezing -- it's EVEN HIGHER.

Why do you panic about temperature variance on a DAY TO DAY basis when you KNOW that the variance is VERY high?
 
You must realize how puerile and meaningless are the arguments you bring forward.

I think the odds are very high that we will fail to take the required action. The world of my children and their children and their children will be royally fucked by ignorant, inconsiderate, self-centered, short-sighted assholes like you Frank. It will cost a thousand times as much as you ever worried about spending to hold it off. You and yours will go down in human history as the lowest of the low. Make sure you leave a note for your great grandchildren explaining why you took the positions you took. Because they will really, really wonder what could possibly have driven you to act with such incredibly extreme irresponsibility.

The lament of a guy who cant fathom on any level that life is all about necessary tradeoffs and that costs matter. Real costs....not imagined costs.

And that is the way it works in the real world. Sorry s0n, but you come to terms with that or you will indeed be miserable for the rest of your days.

Only the confused think people are going to be ok with paying 20% of their income towards energy using the dewey's decimal dumbass climate crusader system of providing electricity. Fucking duh.....that's off the hook k00k logic.....and thank God utterly fringe.

U'll lOsE!!!:bye1::bye1::bye1:
 

Forum List

Back
Top