Then why isn't she in jail?

June 15, 2018
Why didn't David French testify?

Why didn't Glen Clark testify?

All these people with their convincing opinions, but none strong enough to testify?
Why not?



Sure looney Louie.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican, said at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing. He did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia.

Of course......................no proof, as usual.
Yup... Trump Humpers whine about every two bit conspiracy theory they can make up, and prove nothing.
 
Well that isn't true, the evidence gets closer to Hillary personally with each new indictment.
Indictment?
Accusations is more like it, republicans can't even get a charge against her.....................8 years later.
I doubt there will ever be enough to actually get a conviction against Hillary but they are getting those closest to her including her own attorneys.
So, "conservatives" wasting millions of taxpayer $$$, for what?
 
Comey... ?

Comey belongs in prison too.
Along with Hillary right ? The GOP is too incompetent to prove anything except their own willingness to just make up shit about political opponent they have.......and no court believes them. Oh, you don’t believe in the constitution ? The one that dedicates the court’s to adjudicate Humper BS claims ?
 
Then why isn't she in jail?

June 15, 2018
Why didn't David French testify?

Why didn't Glen Clark testify?

All these people with their convincing opinions, but none strong enough to testify?
Why not?



Sure looney Louie.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican, said at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing. He did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia.

Of course......................no proof, as usual.
The reason is fairly simple. The FBI, CIA and the DOJ are corrupt at the top if not all the way through. That fact will eventually cause our representative democracy to fail and may lead to the break up of our nation.


OPINION:

One symptom of a society in crisis is the unreliability or even corruption of its own auditors.

After all, when the watchmen have lost moral authority to watch, who can be believed or trusted? Or, as the Roman satirist Juvenal famously put it, “Who will guard the guardians?”


***snip***


It is easy for our legal and ethical custodians to hound unpopular politicians whom the media despises, and who incur strident political opposition. Investigators and inquisitors know that any dirt they can dig up, even if questionably obtained and of dubious truth, will earn them praise.

In the case of Mr. Trump, our watchmen embraced any means necessary to reach the supposedly noble and popular ends of weakening or removing him.

But the reason we have auditors in the first place is for precisely the opposite purpose: To examine evidence fairly even if the final conclusions are likely to exonerate someone deemed boorish and crude by most of federal officialdom.

In other words, our investigatory agencies should function like the First Amendment, which primarily serves not to protect free speech that we all admire but to protect unpopular speech that most prefer not to hear.

The moral test of our Justice Department, the congressional opposition and the FBI was to give even an often unpopular president some semblance of a fair audit.

All three so far have flopped miserably.
 
The reason is fairly simple. The FBI, CIA and the DOJ are corrupt at the top if not all the way through. That fact will eventually cause our representative democracy to fail and may lead to the break up of our nation.


OPINION:

One symptom of a society in crisis is the unreliability or even corruption of its own auditors.

After all, when the watchmen have lost moral authority to watch, who can be believed or trusted? Or, as the Roman satirist Juvenal famously put it, “Who will guard the guardians?”


***snip***


It is easy for our legal and ethical custodians to hound unpopular politicians whom the media despises, and who incur strident political opposition. Investigators and inquisitors know that any dirt they can dig up, even if questionably obtained and of dubious truth, will earn them praise.

In the case of Mr. Trump, our watchmen embraced any means necessary to reach the supposedly noble and popular ends of weakening or removing him.

But the reason we have auditors in the first place is for precisely the opposite purpose: To examine evidence fairly even if the final conclusions are likely to exonerate someone deemed boorish and crude by most of federal officialdom.

In other words, our investigatory agencies should function like the First Amendment, which primarily serves not to protect free speech that we all admire but to protect unpopular speech that most prefer not to hear.

The moral test of our Justice Department, the congressional opposition and the FBI was to give even an often unpopular president some semblance of a fair audit.

All three so far have flopped miserably.
OPINION?
Trump had more turnover in his regime than McDonald's franchise and STILL didn't get one swamp creature out of the "swamp"?
 
OPINION?
Trump had more turnover in his regime than McDonald's franchise and STILL didn't get one swamp creature out of the "swamp"?
Sure he did. He fired Comey.


1652782400790.jpeg

1652782452444.jpeg

1652782248037.jpeg


1652782121737.jpeg
 
Sure he did. He fired Comey.


View attachment 645750
View attachment 645751
View attachment 645748

View attachment 645747

The criminal sure did.

Then he met with his masters.

May 22 2017
You might have thought it was a bad idea for President Trump to meet with Russian officials the morning after he fired the FBI director leading an investigation into possible collusion with Russia. You might have thought it was a worse idea to exclude American press, or to omit from the official White House account that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, who's at the center of the investigation, was in attendance.

“He chose to receive him because Putin asked him to,” a White House spokesman told the outlet of Trump’s meeting with Lavrov. “Putin did specifically ask on the call when they last talked.”

Reporters raised questions Wednesday as to why a photographer from the Russian media, but not the U.S. press, was apparently allowed into an Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Russian officials.

1652783824148.png
 
The criminal sure did.

Then he met with his masters.

May 22 2017
You might have thought it was a bad idea for President Trump to meet with Russian officials the morning after he fired the FBI director leading an investigation into possible collusion with Russia. You might have thought it was a worse idea to exclude American press, or to omit from the official White House account that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, who's at the center of the investigation, was in attendance.

“He chose to receive him because Putin asked him to,” a White House spokesman told the outlet of Trump’s meeting with Lavrov. “Putin did specifically ask on the call when they last talked.”

Reporters raised questions Wednesday as to why a photographer from the Russian media, but not the U.S. press, was apparently allowed into an Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Russian officials.

View attachment 645756
There’s no real evidence Trump was Putin’s puppet. There’s a lot more evidence that Joe Biden is Putin’s puppet.

1652784758814.jpeg



However I suspect it is Xi Jinping of China that tells Joe when to jump.


1652785124132.jpeg


 
There’s no real evidence Trump was Putin’s puppet. There’s a lot more evidence that Joe Biden is Putin’s puppet.
Really?
The Biden regime will waive sanctions on the corporate entity and CEO overseeing the construction of Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline into Germany.

What does this mean? This means that Biden is giving Russia a huge lift to their struggling economy and gives them more advantage in Europe while harming Ukraine’s position.

Really?
Trump imposed "sanctions" on Nord stream in 2019.
Biden lifted them in May 2021.
Nord stream was completed in June 2021.
So, the Russians completed two years wort of work in one month?

Trump defended Putin, took their side all the time.
Just one instance.

February 6 2017

President Donald Trump appeared to equate US actions with the authoritarian regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview released Saturday, saying, “There are a lot of killers. You think our country’s so innocent?”

Trump made the remark during an interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, saying he respected his Russian counterpart.

“But he’s a killer,” O’Reilly said to Trump.

“There are a lot of killers. You think our country’s so innocent?” Trump replied.
However I suspect it is Xi Jinping of China that tells Joe when to jump.


View attachment 645766

Sure, OPINON.
By Peter Schweizer?

Trump loves China.
President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast. Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)May 13, 2018

Too many jobs in CHINA lost?

Trump did not mention in that tweet or its follow-ups that on Thursday, the developer of a theme park resort outside of Jakarta had signed a deal to receive as much as $500 million in Chinese government loans, as well as another $500 million from Chinese banks, according to Agence France-Presse. Trump’s family business, the Trump Organization, has a deal to license the Trump name to the resort, which includes a golf course and hotels.

Trump dropped sanctions, get's $1 billion Chinese check.
 
The reason is fairly simple. The FBI, CIA and the DOJ are corrupt at the top if not all the way through. That fact will eventually cause our representative democracy to fail and may lead to the break up of our nation.


OPINION:

One symptom of a society in crisis is the unreliability or even corruption of its own auditors.

After all, when the watchmen have lost moral authority to watch, who can be believed or trusted? Or, as the Roman satirist Juvenal famously put it, “Who will guard the guardians?”


***snip***


It is easy for our legal and ethical custodians to hound unpopular politicians whom the media despises, and who incur strident political opposition. Investigators and inquisitors know that any dirt they can dig up, even if questionably obtained and of dubious truth, will earn them praise.

In the case of Mr. Trump, our watchmen embraced any means necessary to reach the supposedly noble and popular ends of weakening or removing him.

But the reason we have auditors in the first place is for precisely the opposite purpose: To examine evidence fairly even if the final conclusions are likely to exonerate someone deemed boorish and crude by most of federal officialdom.

In other words, our investigatory agencies should function like the First Amendment, which primarily serves not to protect free speech that we all admire but to protect unpopular speech that most prefer not to hear.

The moral test of our Justice Department, the congressional opposition and the FBI was to give even an often unpopular president some semblance of a fair audit.

All three so far have flopped miserably.
Really ? Everyone is corrupt except the biggest liar in history who cavorted with dictators and his minions. So, you take the side of Putin over the CIA, FBI and DOJ.
 
There’s no real evidence Trump was Putin’s puppet. There’s a lot more evidence that Joe Biden is Putin’s puppet.

View attachment 645763


However I suspect it is Xi Jinping of China that tells Joe when to jump.


View attachment 645766

Well, you have cartoons and made up shit.
 
If you Q NUTS had any, why didn't your dear leader prosecute Hillary?
Because power doesn’t prosecute power, you dumb-fuck. Show me a single President in US history that was prosecuted. Show me a single spouse of a President who was prosecuted.

Let me guess, you’re ignorant ass thinks they were all altruistic angels who never abused power, right?
 
So, the 9th "investigation" of Hillary didn't produce shit, except more US taxpayer $$$ wasted, again by teabaggers.
There hasn’t been a single actual investigation of Hitlery Clinton, you fucking high school dropout.
January 10 2020
The FBI looked into the conspiracy theory and found nothing.
The F.B.I. :lmao:

Would that be the same corrupt F.B.I. that produced criminals like Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin E. Clinesmith, Scott Carpenter, and a host of other unethical, power-abusing dirt-bags? That F.B.I.? :laugh:

You’re such a fucking clown and little lap-dog.
 
Of course, the left will spend the next 100 years denying that Russia interfered on behalf of Bernie Sanders, just like they’ve spent the past 4 years denying that Russia had a massive campaign operation to help Hitlery Clinton get elected.

Sanders excoriates Russia after being briefed on attempts to help his presidential campaign


https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

Separately, on August 2, 2016, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence. Kilimnik requested the meeting to deliver in person a peace plan for Ukraine that Manafort acknowledged to the Special Counsel’s Office was a “backdoor” way for Russia to control part of eastern Ukraine; both men believed the plan would require candidate Trump’s assent to succeed (were he to be elected President). They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort’s strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.

[snip]

RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN
The Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out the earliest Russian interference operations identified by the investigation—a social media campaign designed to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States. The IRA was based in St. Petersburg, Russia, and received funding from Russian oligarch Yevgeniy Prigozhin and companies he controlled. Prigozhin is widely reported to have ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin

[snip]

The IRA later used social media accounts and interest groups to sow discord in the U.S. political system through what it termed “information warfare.” The campaign evolved from a generalized program designed in 2014 and 2015 to undermine the U.S. electoral system, to a targeted operation that by early 2016 favored candidate Trump and disparaged candidate Clinton. The IRA’s operation also included the purchase of political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities, as well as the staging of political rallies inside the United States. To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the IRA. Section II of this report details the Office’s investigation of the Russian social media campaign.
 
Then why isn't she in jail?
For the same reason OJ Simpson isn’t in jail, you naïve little lapdog :lmao:

For the same reason Adolf Hitler never went to jail, you naïve little lapdog :lmao:

For the same reason John Gotti was found “innocent” 5 times, you naïve little lapdog :lmao:
 
Why didn't David French testify?
  1. Because Hitlery wasn’t prosecuted thanks to her connections
  2. Because he wasn’t called to testify (due to corruption)
Next? Any other dumb questions I can answer for you?
Why didn't Glen Clark testify?
  1. Because Hitlery wasn’t prosecuted thanks to her connections
  2. Because he wasn’t called to testify (due to corruption)
Next? Any other dumb questions I can answer for you?
 
The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican, said at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing. He did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia.

Of course......................no proof, as usual.
Bwahahaha!!! You literally just provided proof!!

It is illegal for a federal employee to use a private email account for work :lmao:

Damn you are dumb! One, a private email isn’t likely to be properly secured (and Hitlery’s wasn’t). Two, if prevents checks & balances oversight, auditing, and historical preservation (which is exactly why Hitlery was using private email - she couldn’t have her crimes subjected to an oversight audit).
 

Forum List

Back
Top