aliens don't exist

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Bullshit.

Better brush up on quantum mechanics. Put the silly god characters aside.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you read what I wrote and you understood what I said then you lie now by being intentionally ignorant. To make something clear: It's a totally unimportant problem whether aliens exist or not.

Yet you felt compelled to present the dusty old fallacy of assigning arbitrary probabilities to events leading to life on earth. A specious old canard used by theists who have let their own lizard brain egos convince themselves that they are special little boys who will live forever and will forever be the only apple of Gawd's eye.

 

[james bond]

We have the fact that life formed at least once in the universe. And no good reason to think it did not happen at least twice. What more do you want? A rubber biscuit?

Humans just had to be created once as male and female and we have a chronology of it.

There is no reason for it to happen more than once as asexuals cannot become sexual. Nor monkeys become humans. We should have a rubber room for the people who believe it can happen, but realistically we can't build a room big enough.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Humans just had to be created once as male and female and we have a chronology of it.

No, sorry. The evidence clearly shows that did not happen. Your silly dogma is known to be false. Looks like you are relegated to brainwashing small children and getting laughed at by educated adults.

 

[james bond]

No, sorry. The evidence clearly shows that did not happen. Your silly dogma is known to be false. Looks like you are relegated to brainwashing small children and getting laughed at by educated adults.

My evidence is in writing and written by other humans living at the time. Their biographies and histories continue on to this day. We have had people who had skills and jobs. Your side has nothing. Not even a chronology. I suppose single-cells cannot write. Your side should be laughed off the planet .

 

[james bond]

Bwahahahahaha. What history and chronology does the atheists and their scientists have? I remember my great-great-great-great-great granddaddy was an amoeba? They fall for anything as long as it backs up atheism. LMAO. The atheists and their scientists are the stupidest people on the planet.

Here's further evidence for the creation science side. Everyone knows the names of most of the plants and animals on the planet. The creationists know who gave them their names.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

People who do not understand the fundamental concept of "evidence" should stick to the religion section.

 

[Stryder50]

It is not just me, it is everybody.

The human race has never seen ANY proof of life outside of earth.

Until we do we have nothing and any ideas that it might exist elsewhere is pure speculation, most often fueled by the fantasy of Science Fiction.

Another thing to consider.

Our sun will last about 10 billion years. Life started about 500 million years ago.

In another few hundred million years the sun will start its expansion and rapidly kill all life on earth.

For the ten billion years the earth will exist life will exist only about one billion years. About 10% of the duration of the planet.

Advanced and intelligent life only a small fraction of that one billion years.

If we do find earth like planets somewhere there is only a one in ten chances we will see it at a time when life is present. A much smaller fraction of that to see advanced life. You know, advanced life like green Orion Slave Girls.

We may one day discover a planet just like earth but like earth was a couple of billion years ago with absolutely no life. Or like earth a billion years from now, with no life.

The chances of finding a galactic empire like we see in many science fiction stories? Nil!

Your timeline is a bit off. Life started on Earth around 3.5 billion years ago (Earth and the Solar System being about 4.5 +/- billion years old).
EXCERPT:
...
The oldest known fossilized prokaryotes were laid down approximately 3.5 billion years ago, only about 1 billion years after the formation of the Earth's crust. Eukaryotes only appear in the fossil record later, and may have formed from endosymbiosis of multiple prokaryote ancestors. The oldest known fossil eukaryotes are about 1.7 billion years old. However, some genetic evidence suggests eukaryotes appeared as early as 3 billion years ago.[42]
...

Prokaryote - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
See also;

Stromatolite - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Guesstimates very, but most place age of the Universe at about 13.8 billion years, since the Big Bang;

Age of the Universe: April 23, 2021 — StarDate Online

Calculating the age of the universe

stardate.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This would suggest a hefty amount of time for life to appear on other worlds and maybe even have evolved beyond we humans here.

 

[Stryder50]

People who do not understand the fundamental concept of "evidence" should stick to the religion section.

People should not confuse evidence and proof either.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

the military has reported UAPs thats not even in dispute ...

Such a Nasty NA$A

Beware when the Illiterate Language Lords make changes, such as UFOs to UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). It means they're up to something devious. Keep calling them UFOs—that'll show them you're not under their spell.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

While all of that makes sense, the problem is that, when you're discussing space travel and, in a sense, time travel, and you couple that with the fact that the ones doing the traveling are from some distant galaxy, the rule book goes out the window. If there's another civilization out there, we have exactly zero understanding what their capabilities are.

A light year to us might be 20 minutes to them.

Albert Einstein, while widely regarded as one of the most intelligent men to ever live, might be considered to be mentally retarded by them.

It's fun to talk about but, until one of them shows up to set us straight, it's just as likely as not that aliens exist...

Quantum Quickie

It's possible to go through the next spatial dimension at a rate of a light-year every three minutes, then come back to our limited universe. But only light itself could be sent, so the sightings would only be of holograms.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You can only go forward in time... never backwards.

Hocus-Wokus

The Democrats are taking us back to the Dark Ages, proving that they have the power to make time run backwards.

 

[RoccoR]

People should not confuse evidence and proof either.

(COMMENT)

Very good point...

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[james bond]

People who do not understand the fundamental concept of "evidence" should stick to the religion section.

The atheist science section including evolution and evolutionary thinking may as well be religion. Science does not back them up and today their atheist "science" deals with invisible particles and energy, i.e. dark matter and dark energy, in the universe. They think the universe is flat when it's saddle shaped or tent shaped. They also think the universe is boundless without any evidence. Too many lies for me.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Such a Nasty NA$A

Beware when the Illiterate Language Lords make changes, such as UFOs to UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). It means they're up to something devious. Keep calling them UFOs—that'll show them you're not under their spell.

That's paranoid nuttery. They changed it to UAP because what they're seeing may not even be objects. They could be optical illusions.

 

[Stryder50]

Such a Nasty NA$A

Beware when the Illiterate Language Lords make changes, such as UFOs to UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). It means they're up to something devious. Keep calling them UFOs—that'll show them you're not under their spell.

Actually, the term UFO = Unidentified Flying Object is nearly 70 years old, having been placed in the early 1950s to supplant "Flying Saucers". Intend would appear to cover sightings and events that might not be 'manufactured devices' which "flying saucers" implied.

The rub is that use of "Object" is still inferring something physical and of possible construct and not specific to aerial phenomena or anomalies, or situations that might suggest trans three physical dimension manifestations.

Possibly a bit overdue for the term change, but UAP provides a broader umbrella of labeling that can include non-physical "objects"(devices).

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually, the term UFO = Unidentified Flying Object is nearly 70 years old, having been placed in the early 1950s to supplant "Flying Saucers". Intend would appear to cover sightings and events that might not be 'manufactured devices' which "flying saucers" implied.

The rub is that use of "Object" is still inferring something physical and of possible construct and not specific to aerial phenomena or anomalies, or situations that might suggest trans three physical dimension manifestations.

Possibly a bit overdue for the term change, but UAP provides a broader umbrella of labeling that can include non-physical "objects"(devices).

*and optical illusions. Which, no doubt account for a large portion of the sightings, if not most of them.

 

[Stryder50]

*and optical illusions. Which, no doubt account for a large portion of the sightings, if not most of them.

You'll have to document that "most of them".
Studies I've seen over the past decades put this way down on the list.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You'll have to document that "most of them".
Studies I've seen over the past decades put this way down on the list.

Which i cannot do. Thus "if".

Please direct us to your published, peer reviewed research.

 

[Stryder50]

Which i cannot do. Thus "if".

Please direct us to your published, peer reviewed research.

Start here;

Project Blue Book - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And;

Condon Committee - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Main challenge with this thread is it starts with a blanket statement that implies the entirety of the Universe, which until we get to other Stars and their planets remains unproven, and unknowable.

Now if you'd started claiming lack of evidence, or better yet proof, of (extra terrestrial) aliens here on Earth, you wouldn't look so ridiculous.