So basically, no peer reviewed published research. Ever. By anyone. And not a shred of evidence ever of a single alien craft.
But mountains of evidence that optical illusions happen and people make mistakes and lie.
All the evidence still points in the same direction. And it isn't aliens.
About what we get from someone lacking in honesty and openness like you;
"This member limits who may view their full profile. "
I don't expect to overcome your ignorance or bias, just make such clear to those reading here.
"Optical illusions" don't create multiple radar returns, cause disruptions to electrical and electronic systems on aircraft that encounter UAPs. Given the hints of the advanced technology displayed by some UAPs, hardly the sort of thing a responsible government is willing to let the general public have access to.
I'd consider reports from military organizations involved in aviation and national defense to be the sort of "peer review" that would be appropriate to the task. Hence the reports I cited. There is also this for general consumption;
Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis Paperback – December 1, 1995
...
Paul Hill was a well-respected NASA scientist when, in the early 1950s, he had a UFO sighting. Soon after, he built the first flying platform and was able to duplicate the UFO's tilt-to-control maneuvers. Official policy, however, prevented him from proclaiming his findings. "I was destined," says Hill, "to remain as unidentified as the flying objects."
For the next twenty-five years, Hill acted as an unofficial clearing house at NASA, collecting and analyzing sightings' reports for physical properties, propulsion possibilities, dynamics, etc. To refute claims that UFOs defy the laws of physics, he had to make "technological sense ... of the unconventional object."
After his retirement from NASA, Hill finally completed his remarkable analysis. In
Unconventional Flying Objects, published posthumously, he presents his findings that UFOs "obey, not defy, the laws of physics." Vindicating his own sighting and thousands of others, he proves that UFO technology is not only explainable, but attainable.
...
Amazon product ASIN 1571740279~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Then there's this item I've a bit of connection to, it be local to where I live;
....
Via Newspapers.com Reports of “UFOs”--or, at least, damned strange objects--diving in and out of large bodies of water are more common than ...
strangeco.blogspot.com
....
....
This is known as the Lummi Island Incident/ a watery 'Roswell"? - which involves what would seem to be a retrieval of the object a few months later by the USN on that New Years Weekend when the divers had gone down to discover the object embedded in the seafloor.
I'll explain more later. Seems a hasty and limited web search only shows the sketchy links I just gave.