Al Imran

deorro 1

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2019
454
18
51
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."



the creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.... breed .... in.... the earth...
of fowl and of cattle.... be fruitful, and multiply.... upon.... the earth...


of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth

of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle that they may be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.




And it was from this 'eating of the flesh of animals' that animal sacrifice(s) began..... which eventually was 'done away with' with the New Covenant...


Question.... Could The LORD and God have used 'animal sacrifice/blood', for specific purposes and reasons, knowing how abundant those of fowls and those of cattle were 'becoming' on the earth?



The Daily Sacrifice
Now that we know something about the types of sacrifices and the various rituals employed, let us consider the times at which these sacrifices were offered and the number of animals involved. The most well known sacrifice was the daily sacrifice. This sacrifice, as its name implies, was offered every day. One lamb was killed in the morning and another in the evening. The daily sacrifice is also called the 'continual burnt offering.'
Numbers 28: 3: And thou shalt say unto them, This is the offering made by fire which ye shall offer unto the LORD; two lambs of the first year without spot day by day, for a continual burnt offering.
4: The one lamb shalt thou offer in the morning, and the other lamb shalt thou offer at even;
5: And a tenth part of an ephah of flour for a meat offering, mingled with the fourth part of an hin of beaten oil.
6: It is a continual burnt offering, which was ordained in mount Sinai for a sweet savour, a sacrifice made by fire unto the LORD.
7: And the drink offering thereof shall be the fourth part of an hin for the one lamb: in the holy place shalt thou cause the strong wine to be poured unto the LORD for a drink offering.
8: And the other lamb shalt thou offer at even: as the meat offering of the morning, and as the drink offering thereof, thou shalt offer it, a sacrifice made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the LORD.

This meant that in the course of a 12 lunar month year (some 354 days) a total of approximately 708 lambs (354 x 2) were sacrificed.


a voice in the wilderness (D.O.T) OR R G?



Since when did the Department of Transportation start working in wildernesses or R G?


------------------------------------


Noun

ferrum (countable and uncountable, plural ferrums)

(homeopathy) Any of various remedies made from iron-containing compounds.

Latin
Wikipedia-logo.png
ferrum on Latin Wikipedia
ferrum
ferrum
ferrum
Etymology

A substrate loanword from an unknown source. According to de Vaan, possibly from a Phoenician dialect[1], “iron”), akin to Aramaicܐ‎ (parzəlā, “iron”), Akkadian (/parzillu/, “iron”), Ugaritic (brḏl, “iron”), considered of Anatolian origin[2]. The word could have entered Latin through Etruscan.[3]

--------------------------------------------------



And it could very well have been from this idea of multiplication and breeding and being 'fruitful' that Governments began the Assistance Programs, such as Welfare and such... Because of the 'over populating' growths...


--------------------------------------------------


This meant that in the course of a 12 lunar month year (some 354 days) a total of approximately 708 lambs (354 x 2) were sacrificed.



To think that this was a high 'number' is small when one compares it to:

By the middle of the 19th century, in the course of a single year 220,000 head of cattle and 1,500,000 sheep would be "violently forced into an area of five acres, in the very heart of London, through its narrowest and most crowded thoroughfares

As the meat requirements of the growing number of residents in London steadily expanded, the meat markets both within the city and beyond attracted increasing levels of public disapproval. Meat had been traded at Smithfield Market as early as the 10th century. By 1726, it was regarded as "without question, the greatest in the world", by Daniel Defoe.


In a 2018 study in the Italian Journal of Food Safety, slaughterhouse workers are instructed to wear ear protectors to protect their hearing from the constant screams of animals being killed.


The worst thing, worse than the physical danger, is the emotional toll. If you work in the stick pit [where hogs are killed] for any period of time—that let’s [sic] you kill things but doesn’t let you care. You may look a hog in the eye that’s walking around in the blood pit with you and think, ‘God, that really isn’t a bad looking animal.’ You may want to pet it. Pigs down on the kill floor have come up to nuzzle me like a puppy. Two minutes later I had to kill them - beat them to death with a pipe. I can’t care.

A 2009 study by criminologist Amy Fitzgerald indicates, "slaughterhouse employment increases total arrest rates, arrests for violent crimes, arrests for rape, and arrests for other sex offenses in comparison with other industries."[37] As authors from the PTSD Journal explain, "These employees are hired to kill animals, such as pigs and cows that are largely gentle creatures. Carrying out this action requires workers to disconnect from what they are doing and from the creature standing before them. This emotional dissonance can lead to consequences such as domestic violence, social withdrawal, anxiety, drug and alcohol abuse, and PTSD."

Slaughterhouses in the United States commonly illegally employ and exploit underage workers and illegal immigrants.[39][40] In 2010, Human Rights Watch described slaughterhouse line work in the United States as a human rights crime.

The HFA alleges that workers are required to kill up to 1,100 hogs an hour and end up taking their frustration out on the animals.[45] Eisnitz interviewed one worker, who had worked in ten slaughterhouses, about pig production.


*wiki slaughter house
---

1,100 hogs an hour to an 8 hour work day at 5 days a week...

or, 1,100 X 8 X 5 = 44,000 per day.....



So, 708 lambs per year

versus

44,000 hogs per day...


And I think that there are more than 1 'slaugtering house(s)' that could need to meet the requirements also...



4156. pniktos
pniktos: strangled

Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: pniktos
Phonetic Spelling: (pnik-tos')
Definition: strangled
Usage: strangled (i.e. killed without letting out the blood).


You may want to pet it. Pigs down on the kill floor have come up to nuzzle me like a puppy. Two minutes later I had to kill them - beat them to death with a pipe. I can’t care.



I understand that there are many individuals who are not 'caught' up in Faith based ideas and doctrines.. But I also know that there are many 'cultures', entire cultures, that are... And I ask those cultures who say they are 'faithful' or who express their own confession to the importance of a strong faith kept life if they truly believe everything they are 'handed'? In other words, although they might not be 'vegetarians', per se, and although they are conscientious to life, do they 'blindly' believe that the 'meats' they purchase from the stores ACTUALLY come from 'trustworthy' places and sources? Do they believe that everyone on Earth has a heart and mind and spirit to care about other lives as they, although not 'vegetarian', per se??


So where in The Holy Scriptures might this be warned against by The Loving Heavenly Father and by The Loving Holy God?


Psalm 146:3 "Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help."



what does 'in whom there is no help' mean?

8668. teshuah
teshuah: deliverance, salvation
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: teshuah
Phonetic Spelling: (tesh-oo-aw')
Definition: deliverance, salvation



Do we actually admit that we 'believe' that just because the person is 'loved of' by The Love of God through Christ Messiah, The Only Begotten Son of The Heavenly Father, that they have this 'salvation' within them so as to be trustworthy?? Is that what we imply when we look out into public places and feel as if they are as 'family' to accept and condone and assimilate with and to?


Now if we, as adults, let us assume, have this 'knowledge', and knowledge is that which would either help our own selves 'to fall' or 'to not fall', Hosea 4:6 being the reference, what might the younger ones who do not have this knowledge be in any 'danger' of??

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." - Hosea 4:6


Or again, is our assumption towards youth as though they 'can do no wrong'?? That they all have loving and caring parents? That they all live in similar home conditions as yours? That their home lives must be similar?

Has your school child, whether in grade school or high school or even college, brought 'home' a 'friend' into your home? What was the 'assumption' towards that 'friend' that was brought into your home? And surely even when certain items 'disappeared' all by itself, so it seems, those assumptions never were seen as the culprits, right?


Yet when your child goes to 'their' home, although maybe 'higher in class' or maybe even 'lower', your child seems to always be home at the right time, always seems to bring the requested materials, always seems to be the 'same child' that was always similarily obedient as always, which again has that assumption be in the minds that all other children must be similar to your own...



The verse says to not put trust.. it does not say to keep a rifle loaded and pointed...



here is another way:

If the just shall live by faith; 'just' - being 'lawful' to community set/established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc... if those lawful persons shall live by 'faith' and not [only] by sight; those that demand a 'sign' as those who do not have 'salvation' in their lives, then can those without 'salvation' in their lives be considered to be 'lawful' to Community Established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc???
 
Last edited:
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)
So which section do you use first as toilet paper?
 
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."
Still wondering what you are trying to say.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Āl ʿImrān [1]

here is another way:

If the just shall live by faith; 'just' - being 'lawful' to community set/established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc... if those lawful persons shall live by 'faith' and not [only] by sight; those that demand a 'sign' as those who do not have 'salvation' in their lives, then can those without 'salvation' in their lives be considered to be 'lawful' to Community Established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc???


So when the 'heart' of man is 'swayed' for wrongful purposes, could these 'resist', would they be able to resist, even with their own 'lack' of having 'salvation' within themselves? Would these even consider that their 'breaking' of rules and set established laws; such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc..., is 'wrong' or 'unjust'?


Or would they be as 'chasing after their own heart', away from those set established rules and laws? And for this reason they would not be able to see those 'laws' but would rather be chasing down and after what their 'heart' is desiring at which ever 'speed' it is going???


Set and Established are as 'fixed' rules.. as in 'fixed' sign posts... as in 'fixed' stop signs.... Maybe even 'grounded' ...



The just shall live by faith, with 'salvation' within them, and will be as 'grounded'.. Solid ground... all other ground can suffer a collapse when that storm 'beats' upon that house....


Matthew 7:25 "And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock."


It was not founded on any 'solid' ground...



Matthew 7:24 "Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:"



this one who heard and did is 'liken' to... in other words, compared to ... not an absolute necessity to...


So if you are going to 'listen' to any words but not do any of what those words 'gave', it could be 'likened' to a person who was nodding off in class because he or she knew that there was enough $$$ in the accessible account for his/her entire lifetime and/or maybe even more. And that a day of necessary work would not be 'required' of ..

Can you imagine being 'adopted' by such providers?


And then there is the 'flip' side. hearing to do 'good', justly, rightly, righteously, with righteous mercy and with righteous judgement, and then to NOT? it is 'likened' unto that same one who heard but did not do....

examples could be:

neglecting your very own
denying the needs of others
turning the blind eye
putting off the 'good' that is needed 'now'... (J)ames 2:14-17 "What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? 15If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? 17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."

such as these things...


One says, 'go and find employment'...
he complains and complains that that one is not seeking employment constantly but gives nothing which might be needful for him/her to do so.... what doth it profit to say 'go and find employment' yet not provide those things which are needful for him/her to find employment?



The above verse speaks of 1 exchanging of time.. maybe 1o minutes, maybe 20,, maybe 30 minutes.. maybe even more due to that person's pleading only to be told to go and be warm and filled but being turned away with nothing.

How long can a person or should a person be left in hunger or in 'a lack or deficiency of something' of those things which are required/needful for the body?



(J)ames 2:14-17 "What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? 15If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? 17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."


Who required 'faith'? The one who asked or the one who was asked?

And on top of this, there is a Greater than the one asked? What???


For self- purposes does one 'spend' excessive 'time'..


But it is 'their time' that has been wasted... not in the accountability of the other..

Whatever might have been 'lost or gained' during their excessiveness is to their own accountability, not to those that were lost or gained, due to their 'excessiveness'.

They even might have spent so excessively that they might have 'gained and lost' the same seeing how 'excessive' the time 'wasted' was... In other words, one thing was gained anew but because of the excessiveness of time, that new gain was lost.. and then still more time was spent in excess... etc...
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
The parable of the miser:

Luke 14:25-30 "And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them, 26If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. 27And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. 28For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it? 29Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, 30Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish."


The cost of finishing didn't make cents... so he kept what he had and went and buried what he had left over..



There was a certain city where the name of a certain Prince was wide spread. So some gathered together and conspired. One day the Prince was to arrive in that city and when he did the conspirators gathered together around him.. 'Teacher, teacher', they asked, 'Who shall enter into The Kingdom of Heaven? He who had much when he passed away or he who had nothing when he passed away'?

Another came and asked him, 'Sir, I hear you are an austere man and that you reap where you have not sown. Are these which I have in my possession those things which you speak of'?


And still others and others. Soon the prince was surrounded by such persons..


When the day had ended the conspirators went about their way and so also the prince. What do you think the prince did?


Although he knew they were conspirators, what did he do?


What did he do for those that came and asked for those things which were needful for the body?


And what might have occurred if those conspirators turned and began to be as 'needfuls'?



Although this earth was created to be inhabited and created so that full knowledge of Christ Messiah can be received, this earth is also grounds for other(s), including both themselves, to have 'sport' upon by and using such 'things' which are needful for the body as the 'rope' of tug of war or as 'cards' as in a card game...


Well because of this, some decided to 'join in'. They could pick this side or they could pick that side.. Some watched from afar and joined in unawares to anyone.

Some even picked up ammunition and firearms.

some even started posting 'fake news' to others' well being or 'not well being'..


To some, impatience is when a person is unable to 'wait' for a minute or so.. To others impatience is when a person is unable to wait for years.


What would have a person need to be patient? A need for something.. Patience for some kind of exchange even if for that 'time' to arrive and usually for that exchange; the exchanging of the current time to that 'expectant' time.

But for a minute? Why might someone need to be made to 'wait', be patient, for 1 minute?

Maybe for 'anger' to 'settle'..


For that 1 minute of patience needed could mean that years would need to be 'waited upon' so as to have that 'anger' have enough 'time' to settle. But why would any 'add' anger upon anger if otherwise unnecessary?


The fool says within his heart that there is no God.. And so the fool says in his heart that God and The LORD is as mankind.. The fool says that God and The LORD is exactly as mankind, that they 'must' have the same boundaries that man has. If a man is made upset, there are only a certain number of ways for that person to relieve that anger. And so the fool thinks this of God and of The LORD. They do not know that with The LORD and with God, that They Are not as man, that They are not confined to what They put 'mankind' within...

But at the same time there are those 'boundaries' which 'man' has set rules to.. And other men are within these 'man made' boundaries. Although these 'rules' are within that which is of 'man', those who are needing to remain within these boundaries are confined by those certain rules even if wrongly needing to be 'upheld'..

What do I mean?

Certain rules state that if 'rent' is not turned in on the 1st of each month, a penalty will be issued. Rule...

The wrong upholding of this rule could be:

Keeping back the paycheck which was supposed to have been received on the 1st, wrongfully, so that person would be unable to turn in 'rent' on the 1st and so the person would incur the penalty fee. etc..


Excuse for noncompliance by any side....

A person should have enough in his/her account for emergencies. If not it shows that person to be irresponsible and so would not require any empathy but rather a stricter 'watch' to that irresponsible person..which in turn would make that landlord or even bank be seen as being merciful for extending their services to such an irresponsible person..



This if in front of any judge and without any provided evidence to a willful holding back of the 'paycheck' that was due would further go to show how irresponsible the person was to even 'suggest' or think of such an idea which points to a deliberate 'fraud' rather than his/her personal 'irresponsibility'.

And if an examiner or one who had knowledge of the Truth to this matter was to be called to testify, a false or true testimony could or might not, be given..depending on that person's own heart's desire...

So maybe the paycheck's employer had no 'know abouts' about this event, per se, but perhaps the delivery of the mail was offset deliberately, although knowing the paycheck was to have been delivered on that day... etc...


Case in point..
Five years on, the Flint water crisis is nowhere near over
As the Michigan city’s water emergency lurches on, pipes are still being replaced—and public trust remains low.


nationalgeographic.2019/04


Looking back five years, the same magnitude of change happened on April 25, 2014, when smiling city officials raised glasses of water to toast a switch that altered 100,000 lives.

At that time, the city's water service changed from nearby Detroit's system to the local Flint River, in an effort to save money. But Flint failed to properly treat the water and dangerous levels of lead leached from old pipes, setting up a public health crisis that has endangered thousands of children and affected every resident, many of whom had to drink bottled water for long periods of time. Some still do. The political fallout was intense, with numerous city and state officials resigning. A city-declared state of emergency remains in effect as remediation continues, and skepticism persists when it comes to the drinking water quality. Many questions also linger about blame and the way the crisis unfolded, as well as about the community's connection to the river. (See portraits of the people living on bottled water.)


After a pair of scientific studies proved lead contamination was present in the water supply, a federal state of emergency was declared in January 2016

15 people criminally charged in the Flint water crisis
.freep.c*m/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2017/06/14/flint-water-crisis-charges/397425001/



theguardian.c*m/us-news/2019/jun/13/flint-water-trial-charges-dropped-michigan

Flint water crisis: prosecutors drop all criminal charges

Associated Press

Thu 13 Jun 2019 15.04 EDT




Michigan Will No Longer Provide Free Bottled Water to Flint


  • April 8, 2018
Michigan will stop providing free bottled water to the city of Flint, Gov. Rick Snyder said on Friday.





 
Last edited:
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)
So which section do you use first as toilet paper?
Page one. BUT If you get the shits and it smells really bad go to the part where Pervert Mohammed ( F.H.AHzCamel) cursed dogs because he was too fucking stupid to know his dog was dead under his bed.
 
A worker, one who is employed, but does not have desire nor willfully 'wants' to 'work' could say things such as:

'Why doesn't everybody be made to work'?
'Why can't I live freely'?
'Why must I work'?

This is to one employed that does not want employment..


Then there are those who are unemployed who say the same.

'Why can't I be helped with work'?
'Why can't I get that sort of 'job'?
'Why must I be unemployed'?



So many 'great' ones out there some 'Greater' than the others and still..... excuses to the masses rather than to the sincere...


The most difficult part to this 'soap opera' is needing to understand 'how' such 'Great' ones are 'able' to do as such... Losing faith and respect to 'Great' ones not only is painful for them but also for those who lost those 'faiths' which is more valuable and precious than pure gold..


1 Peter 1:7 "That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of (J)esus Christ:"


Al-Baaqarah 102

And they followed [instead] what the devils had recited during the reign of Solomon. It was not Solomon who disbelieved, but the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic and that which was revealed to the two angels at Babylon, Harut and Marut. But the two angels do not teach anyone unless they say, "We are a trial, so do not disbelieve [by practicing magic]." And [yet] they learn from them that by which they cause separation between a man and his wife. But they do not harm anyone through it except by permission of Allah . And the people learn what harms them and does not benefit them. But the Children of Israel certainly knew that whoever purchased the magic would not have in the Hereafter any share. And wretched is that for which they sold themselves, if they only knew.


These two?? huh? The first is the testing of faith and then the 'magic' taught by the 2 angels to those who say 'trials are bad'??
Something must not be 'in-line'...



So the first says that the 'trial'.. that the 'test'...

but what if read and received not as 'trial' or not as 'test' but rather as perseverance?



but the perseverance of faith, of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of (J)esus Christ:



One who desires to 'work'; to be employed verses those that do not want to 'work', be employed..



1383. dokimion
dokimion: a testing
Part of Speech: Noun, Neuter
Transliteration: dokimion
Phonetic Spelling: (dok-im'-ee-on)
Definition: a testing
Usage: a test, trial, what is genuine

1384. dokimos
dokimos: tested, approved
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: dokimos
Phonetic Spelling: (dok'-ee-mos)
Definition: tested, approved
Usage: approved, acceptable, tried.



Romans 14:4 "Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand."



a 'self testing'? A 'self' accepting of completion? Only I can either 'accept' or not 'accept' my approval to my using of 'faith'?


one thing that can be 'gained' after this occurs is learning how to deal with everything that is still remaining to be 'fixed' after learning you got through a certain kind of 'ordeal'...

So let us say that certain 'conditions' caused you and your 'faith' to be needed to be used to 'carry onward and upward'. And so you use all that you can with all that you have... Eventually, the pains subside, the worries, the anxieties the fears the tremors, etc... then all of a sudden you look and all those things that began this process is still there.. they have not been remedied. They are still exactly where they were, how they were left but you are not. You can 'tackle' those 'things' again... maybe with 'renewed' strength? Maybe with renewed 'faith'?


Hebrews 11:1 "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."


now this 'faith' is that 'devotion' ... how anything can be 'received' is and can be another story..



Maybe a little light is beginning to be seen.. How can this be???


Can you see how in the past several hundred years or more, only God, with a name very vague and 'wide' has really been held in any type of 'honor'? So if no provisions are not being 'provided' for, it might not be because of The LORD or because of His Only Begotten Son... it might be because God Himself is not providing for what is being 'asked' for; which might be needful for the body...


So where are we instructed or told, since we seek to learn and receive, how or to Whom prayers and requests and petitions should be 'made to'.. etc...

because although many countries have enough $$$ to be sustained and each within them to be within well provided for conditions, are they truly 'better off'? Is Y'srael really truly 'better' off even though they are self sufficient and not as despondent as others?


2 Peter 2:19-21 "While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. 20For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. 21For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them."



I don't think this applies to God, seeing how I just said that God also is a Provider... but to many other providers, even providers of such liberties and freedoms...
 
Last edited:
And so here is another question... Does God and The LORD and The Messiah Christ 'need' 'humans' for other 'humans and lifes' to 'not get to the point of needing to be in hunger or to poverty or to despondency'


Do They require, do They need 'man' to be 'gracious' to others so 'none' enters into that state of 'need'? And if 'mankind' chose to not be gracious or to be gracious with expectations and schemes, would The LORD and God and Christ Messiah be a 'borrower' to their 'lending' of 'graciousness'?

And if it ever got to that point, what would/what could be done about those that have been shipwrecked and needing to continue onward and upward in their faith with Them?


If in Gehenna, are They as 'borrowers' to Gehenna's rulers and leaders and providers? If in Flint Michigan, are They as 'borrowers' to the rulers and leaders in and of Flint Michigan? if in the world, are They as 'borrowers' to the leaders and providers in and of and to the world?


Or is the 'real' question.... 'How would they be able to provide for the real tangible things which are needful for the body, such as monies and such'? Especially in today's social paradigm of 'how 'life'' is supposed to work and be 'lived in' as'', is..
 
Last edited:
Āl ʿImrān [1]

here is another way:

If the just shall live by faith; 'just' - being 'lawful' to community set/established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc... if those lawful persons shall live by 'faith' and not [only] by sight; those that demand a 'sign' as those who do not have 'salvation' in their lives, then can those without 'salvation' in their lives be considered to be 'lawful' to Community Established Laws, such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc???


So when the 'heart' of man is 'swayed' for wrongful purposes, could these 'resist', would they be able to resist, even with their own 'lack' of having 'salvation' within themselves? Would these even consider that their 'breaking' of rules and set established laws; such as speed limits, parking rules, no trespassing rules, etc..., is 'wrong' or 'unjust'?


Or would they be as 'chasing after their own heart', away from those set established rules and laws? And for this reason they would not be able to see those 'laws' but would rather be chasing down and after what their 'heart' is desiring at which ever 'speed' it is going???


Set and Established are as 'fixed' rules.. as in 'fixed' sign posts... as in 'fixed' stop signs.... Maybe even 'grounded' ...



The just shall live by faith, with 'salvation' within them, and will be as 'grounded'.. Solid ground... all other ground can suffer a collapse when that storm 'beats' upon that house....


Matthew 7:25 "And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock."


It was not founded on any 'solid' ground...



Matthew 7:24 "Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:"



this one who heard and did is 'liken' to... in other words, compared to ... not an absolute necessity to...


So if you are going to 'listen' to any words but not do any of what those words 'gave', it could be 'likened' to a person who was nodding off in class because he or she knew that there was enough $$$ in the accessible account for his/her entire lifetime and/or maybe even more. And that a day of necessary work would not be 'required' of ..

Can you imagine being 'adopted' by such providers?


And then there is the 'flip' side. hearing to do 'good', justly, rightly, righteously, with righteous mercy and with righteous judgement, and then to NOT? it is 'likened' unto that same one who heard but did not do....

examples could be:

neglecting your very own
denying the needs of others
turning the blind eye
putting off the 'good' that is needed 'now'... (J)ames 2:14-17 "What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? 15If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? 17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."

such as these things...


One says, 'go and find employment'...
he complains and complains that that one is not seeking employment constantly but gives nothing which might be needful for him/her to do so.... what doth it profit to say 'go and find employment' yet not provide those things which are needful for him/her to find employment?



The above verse speaks of 1 exchanging of time.. maybe 1o minutes, maybe 20,, maybe 30 minutes.. maybe even more due to that person's pleading only to be told to go and be warm and filled but being turned away with nothing.

How long can a person or should a person be left in hunger or in 'a lack or deficiency of something' of those things which are required/needful for the body?



(J)ames 2:14-17 "What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? 15If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? 17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."


Who required 'faith'? The one who asked or the one who was asked?

And on top of this, there is a Greater than the one asked? What???


For self- purposes does one 'spend' excessive 'time'..


But it is 'their time' that has been wasted... not in the accountability of the other..

Whatever might have been 'lost or gained' during their excessiveness is to their own accountability, not to those that were lost or gained, due to their 'excessiveness'.

They even might have spent so excessively that they might have 'gained and lost' the same seeing how 'excessive' the time 'wasted' was... In other words, one thing was gained anew but because of the excessiveness of time, that new gain was lost.. and then still more time was spent in excess... etc...
Try to post something, say, one paragraph in length.
 
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."
Still wondering what you are trying to say.


What I'm trying to say is that The Quran begins with the family of Aram (i think), which is of the first set of children that was born on a new Earth, per se.. All 'things' and 'persons' previous was not written about.
 
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."
Still wondering what you are trying to say.


What I'm trying to say is that The Quran begins with the family of Aram (i think), which is of the first set of children that was born on a new Earth, per se.. All 'things' and 'persons' previous was not written about.
Instead of Adam and Eve? Or Cain and Abel?
 
Nice Dawah.

Are you going to separate out heads from our necks if we decline?
you mean to strike the fingertips and strike above the shoulder?

or strike off?

hmm... I'm thinking that instead of smacking her on her face with a bare hand or with a right or left cross, maybe to 'reprimand' her sharply to what her 'fingertips' and 'above her shoulders' is or is not doing to make her husband peeved to that level, is what God is and was trying to relay...


fingertips are used to wash dishes and many other household and motherly 'duties'... above the shoulders, her head, is where she has her 'brain' to think and reason and understand and learn.. etc...


and supposedly by all means, let her sleep alone.. on a different bed.


You know.. that 'cursed' magic spoken about with Harut and Marut... I wonder if that 'magic' which separates husbands and wives and which is most corrupt and filthy is as when a man sells his life to become as such a 'wife' to another man, who later has his husband peeved to the point of 'striking the fingertips' and 'striking on top of the shoulders'.



Al-Baaqarah 102

And they followed [instead] what the devils had recited during the reign of Solomon. It was not Solomon who disbelieved, but the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic and that which was revealed to the two angels at Babylon, Harut and Marut. But the two angels do not teach anyone unless they say, "We are a trial, so do not disbelieve [by practicing magic]." And [yet] they learn from them that by which they cause separation between a man and his wife. But they do not harm anyone through it except by permission of Allah . And the people learn what harms them and does not benefit them. But the Children of Israel certainly knew that whoever purchased the magic would not have in the Hereafter any share. And wretched is that for which they sold themselves, if they only knew.
 
Last edited:
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."
Still wondering what you are trying to say.


What I'm trying to say is that The Quran begins with the family of Aram (i think), which is of the first set of children that was born on a new Earth, per se.. All 'things' and 'persons' previous was not written about.
Instead of Adam and Eve? Or Cain and Abel?

instead of darkness and a void.. If you ever get a chance... when you are outdoors, look up... Everything you see, even the sky and clouds, the winds which the birds fly upon, all things you can see upwards... it was not there at one point.. All that you see was, at one point, was not there.. There was no 'space' between your sight and an object you can see... Nothing that you can see was there... spreading your hands apart at a distance.. that distance between your hands, at one point, was not there. Life, at one point, was not there. The ground you walk on.. the building and the land it is built on... it was at one point, not there.

There was no light of day or light of night and things seen within that light, in all directions, at one point.. ...


looking out into space with a high level telescope.. those others might have been there but where you were looking from... that was not there at one point..


So all those dark/black 'spaces' in between those 'lights' when looking out to space, and with each light supposedly a sun of a solar system or so? Well all those dark spaces was probably what this solar system was at one point, before it became a solar system..

And even those solar systems, at one point, was not there..


So don't feel bad because nothing was before ... Everything that can be seen and has been seen, at one point, was not there.. Time was not even there, at one point.
 
Last edited:
Āl ʿImrān [1] is the third chapter (surah) of the Quran with two hundred verses (ayat).


Al Baqara is the 2nd chapter of the Quran...


The first chapter is Al Fathiah, or The Opener.


Aram is a son of Shem, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 of the Hebrew Bible, and the father of Uz, Hul, Gether and Mash or Meshech.[1] The Book of Chronicles lists Aram, Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech as descendants of Shem, although without stating explicitly that Aram is the father of the other four.[2]

Aram is usually regarded as being the eponymous ancestor of the Aramean people of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria.

*wiki Aram



The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, in addition to daughters.

*wiki Shem



Upper Mesopotamia is the heartland of ancient Assyria, founded circa the 25th century BC. From the late 24th Century BC it was part of the Akkadian Empire

The region fell to the Assyrians' southern brethren, the Babylonians in 605 BC, and from 539 BC it became part of the Achaemenid Empire; Achaemenid Assyria was known as Athura.




Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great,[4] was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[3]

He was the founder of the "Sargonic" or "Old Akkadian" dynasty, which ruled for about a century after his death until the Gutian conquest of Sumer.[5] The Sumerian king list makes him the cup-bearer to king Ur-Zababa of Kish.[6] His empire is thought to have included most of Mesopotamia, parts of the Levant, besides incursions into Hurrite and Elamite territory, ruling from his (archaeologically as yet unidentified) capital, Akkad (also Agade).

Sargon appears as a legendary figure in Neo-Assyrian literature of the 8th to 7th centuries BC. Tablets with fragments of a Sargon Birth Legend were found in the Library of Ashurbanipal.

*wiki Sargon of Akkad



Hammurabi[a] (c. 1810 – c. 1750 BC) was the sixth king of the First Babylonian dynasty, reigning from c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC (according to the Middle Chronology). He was preceded by his father, Sin-Muballit, who abdicated due to failing health. During his reign, he conquered Elam and the city-states of Larsa, Eshnunna, and Mari. He ousted Ishme-Dagan I, the king of Assyria, and forced his son Mut-Ashkur to pay tribute, bringing almost all of Mesopotamia under Babylonian rule.

*wiki Hammurabi



What am I trying to say?



Al Imran has its Scripture(s) beginning from the family of Aram, the son of Shem.. (i think)


Hence:

The Opening (Noah and the opening of the Ark door on the dried Earth)
The Cow (Flesh of animals are now, for the first time, made permissible to eat as food)
Al Imran (The Children)


Genesis 8:14-19 "And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark."
Still wondering what you are trying to say.


What I'm trying to say is that The Quran begins with the family of Aram (i think), which is of the first set of children that was born on a new Earth, per se.. All 'things' and 'persons' previous was not written about.
Instead of Adam and Eve? Or Cain and Abel?

instead of darkness and a void.. If you ever get a chance... when you are outdoors, look up... Everything you see, even the sky and clouds, the winds which the birds fly upon, all things you can see upwards... it was not there at one point.. All that you see was, at one point, not there.. There was no 'space' between your sight and an object you can see... Nothing that you can see was there... spreading your hands apart at a distance.. that distance between your hands, at one point, was not there.
Neither was my hand before I was born-what is the point?
 
You know.. that 'cursed' magic spoken about with Harut and Marut... I wonder if that 'magic' which separates husbands and wives and which is most corrupt and filthy is as when a man sells his life to become as such a 'wife' to another man, who later has his husband peeved to the point of 'striking the fingertips' and 'striking on top of the shoulders'.



Al-Baaqarah 102

And they followed [instead] what the devils had recited during the reign of Solomon. It was not Solomon who disbelieved, but the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic and that which was revealed to the two angels at Babylon, Harut and Marut. But the two angels do not teach anyone unless they say, "We are a trial, so do not disbelieve [by practicing magic]." And [yet] they learn from them that by which they cause separation between a man and his wife. But they do not harm anyone through it except by permission of Allah . And the people learn what harms them and does not benefit them. But the Children of Israel certainly knew that whoever purchased the magic would not have in the Hereafter any share. And wretched is that for which they sold themselves, if they only knew.


And also let us look at it this way..

a 'thing' which causes separation from a man and his wife. .. which is the 'evil' here? Even if the separation was not caused? divorce/separation...

So if committed to 1 relationship, just as a man and his wife should not be separated but should remain together as, then maybe that 'magic', even if pertaining to 'same male sex' intercourse, would not be 'as magic' but as a man and a wife... Maybe that 'magic' are for those that actually do(es) and goes out and separates a man from his wife.. Male seduction..


Okay.. think about it.. a male who thinks that to separate a man from his wife is just as 'not serious' as anyone eating an ice cream cone.. complacency..

Ezekiel 16:49-50 "Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good."
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top