Adam Schiff's Jig is Up! Woo Hippity Hoo!

[Rustic]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

The IG determines whistle blowers complaints for being credible or not.

If the complaint is not credible after the IG investigates it, the complaint is dismissed by the IG.

The IG found this WB Complaint CREDIBLE and Urgent.

It depends on their political affiliation if they can be trusted… Progressives cannot be trusted

 

[Care4all]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

The IG determines whistle blowers complaints for being credible or not.

If the complaint is not credible after the IG investigates it, the complaint is dismissed by the IG.

The IG found this WB Complaint CREDIBLE and Urgent.

It depends on their political affiliation if they can be trusted… Progressives cannot be trusted

The IG is republican and he found first hand evidence, to support the complaint.

 

[The Original Tree]

That Tucker Carlson guy is one of the American television's biggest political propagandist hacks. He has no credibility and is one of the last people for referring anyone else to being a hack. His specialty is brainwashing and scamming dupes, suckers, and lemmings.

Says the Propagandist Hack who's chin serves as Putin's Balls Rest.

 

[Care4all]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

yea, all those upset at how this would affect future whistle blowers, well i didn't see a one for the former CBS employee fired for helping out a story that was uncovered.

this is why i don't go for the emotional play anymore. its a 1 way sucker bet.

Whistleblower protections do not cover reporters. Protections for reporters was written into the constitution and it doesn't cover getting fired.

She was fired because she broke company rules on journalism.

She had a two year or so intimate relationship with her govt source, without disclosing it.

 

[The Original Tree]

Whistle Blower Protections are idiotic. If The New Media can fire an employee for telling The Truth about a Clinton-Epstein child rape story they squashed, then the Fag-Traitor Eric Ciaramella should be fired and prosecuted for filing false whistle blower report.

 

[The Original Tree]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

yea, all those upset at how this would affect future whistle blowers, well i didn't see a one for the former CBS employee fired for helping out a story that was uncovered.

this is why i don't go for the emotional play anymore. its a 1 way sucker bet.

Whistleblower protections do not cover reporters. Protections for reporters was written into the constitution and it doesn't cover getting fired.

She was fired because she broke company rules on journalism.

She had a two year or so intimate relationship with her govt source, without disclosing it.

Pretty much every Democrat you just described there since they love to publish classified information, from leakers like Brennan, Clapper, Comey and McCabe.

 

[Rustic]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

The IG determines whistle blowers complaints for being credible or not.

If the complaint is not credible after the IG investigates it, the complaint is dismissed by the IG.

The IG found this WB Complaint CREDIBLE and Urgent.

It depends on their political affiliation if they can be trusted… Progressives cannot be trusted

The IG is republican and he found first hand evidence, to support the complaint.

Just because they call themselves a Republican does not mean they are not a progressive all GOP establishment types are progressive and cannot be trusted

 

[Care4all]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

The IG determines whistle blowers complaints for being credible or not.

If the complaint is not credible after the IG investigates it, the complaint is dismissed by the IG.

The IG found this WB Complaint CREDIBLE and Urgent.

It depends on their political affiliation if they can be trusted… Progressives cannot be trusted

The IG is republican and he found first hand evidence, to support the complaint.

Just because they call themselves a Republican does not mean they are not a progressive all GOP establishment types are progressive and cannot be trusted

You are lost.... I'll pray for you, to be found!

 

[airplanemechanic]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.

For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.

 

[Rustic]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

The IG determines whistle blowers complaints for being credible or not.

If the complaint is not credible after the IG investigates it, the complaint is dismissed by the IG.

The IG found this WB Complaint CREDIBLE and Urgent.

It depends on their political affiliation if they can be trusted… Progressives cannot be trusted

The IG is republican and he found first hand evidence, to support the complaint.

Just because they call themselves a Republican does not mean they are not a progressive all GOP establishment types are progressive and cannot be trusted

You are lost.... I'll pray for you, to be found!

Lol
Says a socialist

 

[MeBelle]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

WB protection has always protected their identity if the IG determines such, in order to protect them from intimidation from those being reported on ...retaliation...

And to ENCOURAGE whistleblowers to come forward to report, waste, fraud, and abuse.

No....

The WB act refers only to Federal employees.

The 'Act' protects Federal employees from retaliation in the workplace.

The 'Act' does not protect identity.

 

[OldLady]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?

B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?

the left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.

when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?

Try following the testimony which confirms the behind the scenes, off the reservation pressure to force Zelensky to follow up on a debunked conspiracy theory straight out of Steve Bannon's asshole. All in an attempt to smear Trump's political rival.

 

[OldLady]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.

For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.

Well, some of us see him as a hero. Hope he's not harrassed.

 

[Rustic]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?

B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?

the left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.

when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?

Try following the testimony which confirms the behind the scenes, off the reservation pressure to force Zelensky to follow up on a debunked conspiracy theory straight out of Steve Bannon's asshole. All in an attempt to smear Trump's political rival.

Political correctness has made you fucking retarded

 

[DOTR]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

yet both can’t be true. The real lesson here is you have no free press. You have propaganda outlets of Pravda proportions.

 

[Care4all]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.

For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.

How do you protect the WB from intimidation and retaliation, without anonymity silly one...?

How do you encourage WB to come forward without anonymity?

How many of the other 17 WB complaints the IG processed this past year do you know the names of?



YOU are repeating a lie, the right wing is twisting and turning and spinning and pushing to cover for Trump' s retaliation towards the WB.... for his evil.

 

[MeBelle]

B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?

nice ... your 'descriptives' and 'whatifisms' don't apply here.


The WB act has nothing to do with political party.

So, don't try making the WB Act something it isn't.

TIA

 

[BuckToothMoron]

That Tucker Carlson guy is one of the American television's biggest political propagandist hacks. He has no credibility and is one of the last people for referring anyone else to being a hack. His specialty is brainwashing and scamming dupes, suckers, and lemmings.

That Rachel Maddow dude is at least as big of a political propagandist hack. You can’t get the unbiased truth out of either one.

 

[MeBelle]

Try following the testimony which confirms the behind the scenes, off the reservation pressure to force Zelensky to follow up on a debunked conspiracy theory straight out of Steve Bannon's asshole. All in an attempt to smear Trump's political rival.

There IS no testimony to follow!

Any 'testimony' is in the Dem's Star Chamber and hidden from the public.

 

[iceberg]

Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.

Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection

How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?

B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?

the left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.

when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?

Try following the testimony which confirms the behind the scenes, off the reservation pressure to force Zelensky to follow up on a debunked conspiracy theory straight out of Steve Bannon's asshole. All in an attempt to smear Trump's political rival.

maybe.

but that still doesn't give the recent history of the left a whole lot of credibility given their tactics that have been found to be lies very recently. if we want to go crazy on trump lies, great. lets go. but we can't excuse one side and attack the other or we continue in a mentality that only drives us all down.

now what if bidens son was being paid by bursima in order to have a direct contact to biden himself? we do have e-mails showing they did this.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

the dems want EVERYTHING released while they hide thousands of documents like this. it's not that i trust what trump is doing. if he's acting outside the law sure - let's figure it out. but lets not keep a blind eye to the accuser who has *at least* as much dirt on them.

to me - this is simply going after trump for a sentence while they ignore books of their own issues and expect us to do the same. this isn't about protecting trump to me - it's about making sure their dirty laundry gets the same attention as they bring to others.

if we're going to take down those breaking the law, get 'em all or why bother?