A Sad Day for Truthers......Another 9-11 Aniversary

[eots]

think about it.

Al quaeda would keep it secret because they want to keep their leader as he draws in the recruits.

The governments of the world would want it kept secret because they don't want him to be a martyr.

if he is in fact dead.

well it is interesting to see that in some cases you suspend your belief that large groups of people or government cant conspire or maintain secrecy

no it doesnt
do you really think al qaeda has that many in the upper echelons that would know or have contact with bin laden?

I dont know how many 9/11 commission members do you think have contact with covert agents that plant explosives ?

 

[DiveCon]

well it is interesting to see that in some cases you suspend your belief that large groups of people or government cant conspire or maintain secrecy

no it doesnt
do you really think al qaeda has that many in the upper echelons that would know or have contact with bin laden?

I dont know how many 9/11 commission members do you think have contact with covert agents that plant explosives ?

thats fucking stupid
since the commission wouldn't have had to have contact with ANY of them
but the sheer number it would have required to do the job rules that out

 

[Fizz]

9 years and still no bin laden and supposedly the entire international intelligence community looking for him million dollar rewards..still nothing must mean he didn't do it or never existed

the logic here is hilarious!!!

there is an uncollected reward so he must never have existed!!

find any evidence other than "it doesnt look right to me" yet?

 

[daveman]

Not to mention your dead in a cave theory..lol...so I guess we are left to conclude they can not find the "evidence"..it is being kept secret... by many people...

YOU are left to conclude that. Normal people, however, know looking for someone who doesn't want to be found in terrain as rugged as that region of the world is not as easy as finding stupid people on the internet.

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

 

[georgephillip]

no it doesnt
do you really think al qaeda has that many in the upper echelons that would know or have contact with bin laden?

I dont know how many 9/11 commission members do you think have contact with covert agents that plant explosives ?

thats fucking stupid
since the commission wouldn't have had to have contact with ANY of them
but the sheer number it would have required to do the job rules that out

The sheer number of agents required to wire WTC would have been far less than those required by the Manhattan Project.

"The project's roots began in the 1939 when at the urging of Leó Szilárd, Albert Einstein wrote a letter to President Roosevelt expressing his concerns that Nazi Germany may be trying to develop nuclear weapons.

"The Manhattan Project, which began as a small research program that year, eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in present day value). It resulted in the creation of several research and production sites whose construction and operations were secret.[2]

"Project research took place at more than 30 sites, including universities across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

"The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site in eastern Washington state; the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. atomic weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947"

If Manhattan was possible to accomplish in secrecy, the WTC could have been wired with far fewer operatives. Secrecy could have been insured by large amounts of cash and family-wide death sentences for anyone who talked.

 

[eots]

YOU are left to conclude that. Normal people, however, know looking for someone who doesn't want to be found in terrain as rugged as that region of the world is not as easy as finding stupid people on the internet.

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

So do you have a link to this factoid ? no of course you dont just another ASSumotion

 

[eots]

9 years and still no bin laden and supposedly the entire international intelligence community looking for him million dollar rewards..still nothing must mean he didn't do it or never existed

the logic here is hilarious!!!

there is an uncollected reward so he must never have existed!!

find any evidence other than "it doesnt look right to me" yet?

the logic is hilarious !!!

there is no official proof of explosives because they did not look for any and against all protocol spoiled the crime scene

therefore explosives never existed


got anything other than a story about a man who lives in caves yet ?...lol

 

[DiveCon]

I dont know how many 9/11 commission members do you think have contact with covert agents that plant explosives ?

thats fucking stupid
since the commission wouldn't have had to have contact with ANY of them
but the sheer number it would have required to do the job rules that out

The sheer number of agents required to wire WTC would have been far less than those required by the Manhattan Project.

"The project's roots began in the 1939 when at the urging of Leó Szilárd, Albert Einstein wrote a letter to President Roosevelt expressing his concerns that Nazi Germany may be trying to develop nuclear weapons.

"The Manhattan Project, which began as a small research program that year, eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in present day value). It resulted in the creation of several research and production sites whose construction and operations were secret.[2]

"Project research took place at more than 30 sites, including universities across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

"The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site in eastern Washington state; the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. atomic weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947"

If Manhattan was possible to accomplish in secrecy, the WTC could have been wired with far fewer operatives. Secrecy could have been insured by large amounts of cash and family-wide death sentences for anyone who talked.

and how long did that stay secret?

 

[candycorn]

thats fucking stupid
since the commission wouldn't have had to have contact with ANY of them
but the sheer number it would have required to do the job rules that out

The sheer number of agents required to wire WTC would have been far less than those required by the Manhattan Project.

"The project's roots began in the 1939 when at the urging of Leó Szilárd, Albert Einstein wrote a letter to President Roosevelt expressing his concerns that Nazi Germany may be trying to develop nuclear weapons.

"The Manhattan Project, which began as a small research program that year, eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in present day value). It resulted in the creation of several research and production sites whose construction and operations were secret.[2]
St
"Project research took place at more than 30 sites, including universities across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

"The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site in eastern Washington state; the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. atomic weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947"

If Manhattan was possible to accomplish in secrecy, the WTC could have been wired with far fewer operatives. Secrecy could have been insured by large amounts of cash and family-wide death sentences for anyone who talked.

and how long did that stay secret?

Stalin likely knew of the events at Trinity before Truman. It is absolutely incredible how ignorant the truthers are on every topic. I wouldn't have thought such wholesale idiocy was possible before encountering the twoofers.

 

[candycorn]

If Manhattan was possible to accomplish in secrecy, the WTC could have been wired with far fewer operatives. Secrecy could have been insured by large amounts of cash and family-wide death sentences for anyone who talked.

and how long did that stay secret?

Death sentences for anyone who talked. Yeah...they supposedly just murdered 3,000 and now they're going to be scared silent? Sit your skinny ass down girl and watch some more cartoons; grown folks are talking.

Like in 10 years none of them have gotten divorced or widowed, thus losing this leverage on their head (as if mass murderers come from a stable family structure at the outset).

 

[eots]

YOU are left to conclude that. Normal people, however, know looking for someone who doesn't want to be found in terrain as rugged as that region of the world is not as easy as finding stupid people on the internet.

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

hey Dave you are yet to explain how the evidence manufactured to support controlled demolition theories violates the laws of physics ...still waiting

 

[eots]

If Manhattan was possible to accomplish in secrecy, the WTC could have been wired with far fewer operatives. Secrecy could have been insured by large amounts of cash and family-wide death sentences for anyone who talked.

and how long did that stay secret?

Death sentences for anyone who talked. Yeah...they supposedly just murdered 3,000 and now they're going to be scared silent? Sit your skinny ass down girl and watch some more cartoons; grown folks are talking.

Like in 10 years none of them have gotten divorced or widowed, thus losing this leverage on their head (as if mass murderers come from a stable family structure at the outset).

where is bin laden ??..can only Muslims keep secrets ??

during the first moon launch an object followed the capsule..they where told to never mention it and until nearing the ends of there lives 40m years later they did


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI]YouTube - Astronaut Buzz Aldrin Recounts Apollo 11 UFO Encounter[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

hey Dave you are yet to explain how the evidence manufactured to support controlled demolition theories violates the laws of physics ...still waiting

There is no evidence to support controlled demo theories.....

 

[eots]

Like I said: Stupid people.

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

hey Dave you are yet to explain how the evidence manufactured to support controlled demolition theories violates the laws of physics ...still waiting

There is no evidence to support controlled demo theories.....

the evidence is in the nature of the collapse.. however there is no evidence of the temperatures required for structural failure due to fire ever existed



"A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure "


OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

 

[SFC Ollie]

Keep telling yourself that...

 

[daveman]

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

So do you have a link to this factoid ? no of course you dont just another ASSumotion

"The fact that NO ONE has ever come forward PROVES the conspiracy!!"

 

[daveman]

As those seeking the evidence in 9/11 from those that wish not to reveal it

Like I said: Stupid people.

if covert operations dont wish to be discovered they dont supply evidence against themselves

Quite often, they do. People have a hard time keeping secrets. If there's a plot that requires a large number of people to keep silent, it will be revealed -- or it never existed to begin with.

hey Dave you are yet to explain how the evidence manufactured to support controlled demolition theories violates the laws of physics ...still waiting

Easy. Your dumbass "The Towers fell at free-fall speed!!" argument is disproved by this video:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8lrTy5mrZY]YouTube - 9/11: Anonymous new release of 3 WTC collapse videos[/ame]

If the Towers fell at free-fall speed, what made the other debris fall FASTER than free-fall? Evvvil Bush Gravity Machines?

Found this video that disproves your dumbass assertion that no plane parts went all the way through:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHFLfw_M5-8]YouTube - WTC 9.11.2001[/ame]

Do you really think those were office chairs being thrown out the other side at 300+ mph?

Oh, sorry, didn't mean to embarrass you, because you don't think at all.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Whoops, there goes that free fall speed theory blown all to shit. Again!

 

[daveman]

the evidence is in the nature of the collapse.. however there is no evidence of the temperatures required for structural failure due to fire ever existed



"A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure "


OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

"A careful reading"? No, a willfully ignorant reading.

Based on this comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns.​

What happens to steel at 1000 degrees C?

The yield strength of steel is reduced to about half at 550 ºC. At 1000 ºC, the yield strength is 10 percent or less.​

And what is yield strength?

The ability of a metal to tolerate gradual progressive force without permanent deformation.​

So: The fire was hot enough to cause the steel of the towers to lose 90% of their strength.

So your claim is, as usual, wrong. Dumbass.

 

[daveman]

Whoops, there goes that free fall speed theory blown all to shit. Again!

Of course. But dumbass will not accept it. He enjoys his mental illness too much.