The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[BothWings]

Were you flying at 500 feet? If so, you probably should change airlines.

We were flying pretty low during a decent. I've tried it many times, many places like that where there should have been coverage but there was no service. And one day there just was. I believe that may have been near Cleveland.

 

[PeterPilot]

I would never make a habit of believing you.
Especially because you post no backup for your claims.

But you DO believe the claims made by known liars, got it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But you DO believe the claims made by known liars, got it.

It's true, 4 planes were hijacked and crashed on 911.

Still waiting for some proof of your claims. And waiting. And waiting.

 

[PeterPilot]

It's true, 4 planes were hijacked and crashed on 911.

Still waiting for some proof of your claims. And waiting. And waiting.

You can't help it, you've been conditioned over your life to believe things that cannot be proved, fantasies. You're typical in that regard. They started us all out on Santa Claus and Easter Bunny. Some grew up, others did not.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You can't help it, you've been conditioned over your life to believe things that cannot be proved, fantasies. You're typical in that regard. They started us all out on Santa Claus and Easter Bunny. Some grew up, others did not.

I've been conditioned to notice you've posted no proof of your claims.

 

[Soupnazi630]

We were flying pretty low during a decent. I've tried it many times, many places like that where there should have been coverage but there was no service. And one day there just was. I believe that may have been near Cleveland.

Yet you cannot seem to accept that none of tjat crap about cell phones matter since the calls, on 911, were made with SATELLITE phones

 

[Soupnazi630]

But you DO believe the claims made by known liars, got it.

Who believes the claims by the known liars here such as you?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Maybe, maybe not. Let's throw more jet fuel on the fire. Didn't the Project For A New American Century, written by the neocons, state that in order to just go in and bomb 7 middle eastern countries, something catastrophic needs to happen on American soil? Then, less that 2 years later the towers come down and GW Bush starts his bombing campaigns. Convenient coincidence? Now there's a BIG motive. There seemed to have been a lot of convenient coincidences with this event. I don't have a dog in this 9/11 fight, but I am not stupid enough to just blindly trust a government narrative just as I am not stupid enough to blindly trust conspiracy theorists. I can't say one way or another, and really don't care at this point.

Dorian Mode only a complete idiot would believe this story of the governments,the craziest and looniest conspiracy theory of all time ever invented.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dorian Mode only a complete idiot would believe this story of the governments,the craziest and looniest conspiracy theory of all time ever invented.

As usual the paid shill has no evidence just cartoon videos

 

[Dorian Mode]

Dorian Mode only a complete idiot would believe this story of the governments,the craziest and looniest conspiracy theory of all time ever invented.

I'm not that interested in this fight, but if I ever were to get involved in the subject, I would probably listen to structural engineers, architects, physicists, maybe some pilots, and people who followed the money surrounding 9/11. I wouldn't waste my time arguing with forum trolls who blindly believe everything the government tells them. Was Biden really running circles around his staff?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I'm not that interested in this fight, but if I ever were to get involved in the subject, I would probably listen to structural engineers, architects, physicists, maybe some pilots, and people who followed the money surrounding 9/11. I wouldn't waste my time arguing with forum trolls who blindly believe everything the government tells them. Was Biden really running circles around his staff?

There are no such experts who followed the money

The forum trolls are those likely you who blindly believe whatever some conspiracy theorist spews

 

[Soupnazi630]

I'm not that interested in this fight, but if I ever were to get involved in the subject, I would probably listen to structural engineers, architects, physicists, maybe some pilots, and people who followed the money surrounding 9/11. I wouldn't waste my time arguing with forum trolls who blindly believe everything the government tells them. Was Biden really running circles around his staff?

" Im not interested in this fight "

Yet you keep fighting it

 

[wist43]

It's true, 4 planes were hijacked and crashed on 911.

Is it true??

The starting point for your claim is "hijackers", right??

Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

That being the case, any information provided by the government regarding the "hijackers" is necessarily fabricated.

There is proof that they were being run as CIA assets, there is no proof that any of them even boarded the planes.

As for planes crashing - nobody can say what crashed at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, but it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO - a fact that alone would make it highly likely that those planes were beefed up and reinforced to withstand the forces which the perpetrators knew would be exerted upon the planes.

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill - which none of "the hijackers" possessed - which makes it highly likely that those planes were being flown remotely.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I'm not that interested in this fight, but if I ever were to get involved in the subject, I would probably listen to structural engineers, architects, physicists, maybe some pilots, and people who followed the money surrounding 9/11. I wouldn't waste my time arguing with forum trolls who blindly believe everything the government tells them. Was Biden really running circles around his staff?

9 out of 10 posters on the net that defend the official conspiracy theory are paid trolls,they have many here that have penetrated this site and they got them everywhere on other sites as well of course so i have them all on ignore.

they defend ALL the governments version of events so they are transparent. the only ones i ever attempt to reason with and bother with are the ones who while they accept it that the CIA killed jfk and there was a major conspiracy there,they never look at the evidence of 9/11.

they can accept it that their government lied to them on jfk and their government killed him yet they dont question 9/11 and dont listen to eyewitnesses that heard explosives no matter how credible they are.

Got to figure that they accept it they were lied to on JFK because that was so long ago and was just the murder of one person but 9/11 hits too close to home for them and they dont want to look at the evidence because its too scary a thought for them to believe their government murdered over 3000 citizens i guess.

its always too easy to corner them and make them understand 9/11 was an inside job even though they wont admit it because what i always do is i ask them the question-okay you can accept it that they lied to you about the kenendy assassination and the CIA killed kennedy yet you cant accept it they lied to you on 9/11 and the CIA pulled that one off as well,why? they then are speechless and dont have an answer,they know the truth,they are just to afraid to own up and admit it that they got checkmated.

 

[candycorn]

But you DO believe the claims made by known liars, got it.

Well, tell us where the 9/11 Commission Report got it wrong....

You say it’s wrong but you can’t identify a single point. Got it.

 

[ranfunck]

Well, tell us where the 9/11 Commission Report got it wrong....

You say it’s wrong but you can’t identify a single point. Got it.

But....but.... but... the light poles

 

[candycorn]

Is it true??

Yes.

The starting point for your claim is "hijackers", right??

No claims; they were hijackers.

Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

That being the case, any information provided by the government regarding the "hijackers" is necessarily fabricated.

There is proof that they were being run as CIA assets, there is no proof that any of them even boarded the planes.

Please post the proof here.

As for planes crashing - nobody can say what crashed at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, but it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

Yes we can. It was flights 77 and 93. The lightpoles prove it was an aircraft in DC not to mention the wreckage, radar tracking, DNA, etc...

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO - a fact that alone would make it highly likely that those planes were beefed up and reinforced to withstand the forces which the perpetrators knew would be exerted upon the planes.

Complete rubbish.

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill - which none of "the hijackers" possessed - which makes it highly likely that those planes were being flown remotely.

No it wouldn’t.

 

[candycorn]

But....but.... but... the light poles

Just like a dog...if you guys keep crapping on the carpet by making allegations, I’ll keep rubbing your nose in it. Thats how your train them.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Is it true??

The starting point for your claim is "hijackers", right??

Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

That being the case, any information provided by the government regarding the "hijackers" is necessarily fabricated.

There is proof that they were being run as CIA assets, there is no proof that any of them even boarded the planes.

As for planes crashing - nobody can say what crashed at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, but it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO - a fact that alone would make it highly likely that those planes were beefed up and reinforced to withstand the forces which the perpetrators knew would be exerted upon the planes.

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill - which none of "the hijackers" possessed - which makes it highly likely that those planes were being flown remotely.

There is nothing whatsoever in or connected to able danger which confirms any link between the hijackers and the CIA. Your claim that it confirms something is a made up lie.

There is no such proof of any kind that they never boarded or that they were CIA assets.

The planes were all flown within VMO that is estavlished fact. They were not flown above it.


The hijackers had all the skills they needed.

You have no evidence or proof of any of this shit you claim

 

[Soupnazi630]

9 out of 10 posters on the net that defend the official conspiracy theory are paid trolls,they have many here that have penetrated this site and they got them everywhere on other sites as well of course so i have them all on ignore.

they defend ALL the governments version of events so they are transparent. the only ones i ever attempt to reason with and bother with are the ones who while they accept it that the CIA killed jfk and there was a major conspiracy there,they never look at the evidence of 9/11.

they can accept it that their government lied to them on jfk and their government killed him yet they dont question 9/11 and dont listen to eyewitnesses that heard explosives no matter how credible they are.

Got to figure that they accept it they were lied to on JFK because that was so long ago and was just the murder of one person but 9/11 hits too close to home for them and they dont want to look at the evidence because its too scary a thought for them to believe their government murdered over 3000 citizens i guess.

its always too easy to corner them and make them understand 9/11 was an inside job even though they wont admit it because what i always do is i ask them the question-okay you can accept it that they lied to you about the kenendy assassination and the CIA killed kennedy yet you cant accept it they lied to you on 9/11 and the CIA pulled that one off as well,why? they then are speechless and dont have an answer,they know the truth,they are just to afraid to own up and admit it that they got checkmated.

There is no evidence of paid trolls just your assertion which is the idiotic babblings of a fool

You have never cornered anyone

You have been proven wrong on every claim. The problem is that you are a brat suffering from arrested development who can never admit he is wrong.

You are wrong and you know you are but you will shreik in denial forever