The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

Truthie Traitors

Even if true, couldn't the Jihadis set all those explosives? It's logical that there were far more terrorists involved than the 18 hijackers.
No

It is not logical

Wiring a building with explosives is a complex , time and man power intensive process.

You have to clear everything from inside. As in walls and floors and ceilings before even starting to install explosives. This was never done.

The ignition system HAS TO BE PHYSICAL as in no remote control or radio ignition systems. This is so that sone random person with a ham radio does not screw around and prematurly detonate the explosives.

The explosives have to be carefully planted in pre planned spots to work effectively. Any impact such as a plane crash into the building would dislodge these explosives and they would then fail to work as intended to bring the building down,

In a building the size of WTC this work would have to be done by hundreds of people any number of which would then talk and there is no way to silence them all even by killing them

The whole claim of controlled demo is a childish and stupid fantasy
 
Last edited:
You guess?

Nice.

We KNOW you can’t identify one major point in the 9/11 Commission report that they got wrong.

I guess you guys just aren’t that smart...otherwise you’d be pointing out what the got wrong. Instead...you got nothing...just a flunked smell test....

Put another way...you guys stink.
These Expensive Blogs Are Funded by Globalists

Another sign of the brainwashing of these Jihadi-lovers is that they can't think for themselves even to make their Masters' claims sound better.

(1) September 11, 1683 was the peak of the last jihad, which would have conquered the world if someone like Osama had been in charge that day.

(2) in February 1973, the Israelis shot down an off-course Libyan airliner flying over Israeli territory, telling the world that they had discovered a terrorist plan to hijack a plane and fly it into a building full of people.

(3) to sell more office space, the World Trade Center was constructed with the main support on the outer part of the buildings. That's why the previous bombers thought they could collapse one with a bomb in the basement.
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that this is still discussed 25 years later. I never wasted much time with 9/11 because I always had better things to do. I have a BS in Engineering and an MBA. I remember a very large panel of engineers, physicists and architects all presented tons of very credible evidence that was always ignored. Their take home message is that it is almost impossible to bring down a skyscraper, especially with fire, and for it to come down at the speed of free fall. Hard to ignore that. Then as someone with financial knowledge, all I can say is if you want to truly understand something, don't listen to and trust the government, the media, and people in general. Instead, follow the money. There are a few people that got incredibly rich because of 9/11. Why?
Your Loaded Question Could Only Fire Blanks

To fund more terrorism. Follow that money!
 
Is it true??

The starting point for your claim is "hijackers", right??

Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

That being the case, any information provided by the government regarding the "hijackers" is necessarily fabricated.

There is proof that they were being run as CIA assets, there is no proof that any of them even boarded the planes.

As for planes crashing - nobody can say what crashed at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, but it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO - a fact that alone would make it highly likely that those planes were beefed up and reinforced to withstand the forces which the perpetrators knew would be exerted upon the planes.

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill - which none of "the hijackers" possessed - which makes it highly likely that those planes were being flown remotely.

Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

1773269490314.webp


it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

Why?

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO

They were flown at an unsafe speed? Oh no, that may cause some structural damage, right?

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill

Why?
 
There is a certain little country who hates its Islamic neighbors, which gained an active ally in the U.S. as a result of 9/11. Very very convenient.
Israel Is Our Shield

Since our leadership class is so ignorant, and they brainwash us to follow their lead, it must be concluded that we'd be speaking Arabic or Farsi by now if some people had not wanted to live where they could speak Hebrew.
 
It's an honor to be called playground names by a traitor working for the Globalists' Jihad
No where in my post did I call you a name now as I said follow the money and identify specifically where is leads or you are full of shit

BTW I still did not call you any names

You do not tell others to follow the money if you want to demonstrate evidence, you do it yourself and show the results.
 
I Agree Both,..... If One were to study the "Cause & Effect" of 9-11,.... If by now they haven't been "Totally Dumbed Down", by Our Government, Media, & Educational System, I'm Thinking that they would be thoroughly enraged, by what America has done for that "Little country", at the astronomical expense of "We the People".
Other Commoner Groups Should Imitate the Jews Instead of Being Jealous of Them, Being Pleasant Peasants Who Blindly Look for Scapegoats
 
Well, Operation Able Danger confirms that Atta and some of the other "hijackers" were being controlled by the CIA.

View attachment 1229788

it is impossible that a plane struck the Pentagon.

Why?

And the two planes that hit the WTC were both flown well above VMO

They were flown at an unsafe speed? Oh no, that may cause some structural damage, right?

Furthermore, to fly a plane at those speeds would require considerable skill

Why?
Webster Tarpley can explain it better than I can - but I assume you have no interest in challenging your preconceived notions.

And I'm not going to write volumes in an effort to convince you.

If you actually want to learn something, you have to challenge you understanding.

 
Webster Tarpley can explain it better than I can - but I assume you have no interest in challenging your preconceived notions.

And I'm not going to write volumes in an effort to convince you.

If you actually want to learn something, you have to challenge you understanding.



Is any of that supposed to support any of your claims?

Why do you feel that way?
 
Webster Tarpley can explain it better than I can - but I assume you have no interest in challenging your preconceived notions.
I would love to have someone challenge my pre-existing notions. You're not putting up much of a challenge.

Any word on the light poles and what knocked them down if it wasn't AA77?
 
⁶Is any of that supposed to support any of your claims?

Why do you feel that way?
As I said Tarpley explains a lot of it very well.

Once you understand false flags a bit, state sponsored terrorism makes more sense.

Watch the documentary Nato's Secret Armies.

The CIA, MI6, and Mossad have been deliberately killing innocent civilians for decades.

You believe the MSM and your government. You will never find the truth barking up that tree.
 
As I said Tarpley explains a lot of it very well.

Once you understand false flags a bit, state sponsored terrorism makes more sense.

Watch the documentary Nato's Secret Armies.

The CIA, MI6, and Mossad have been deliberately killing innocent civilians for decades.

You believe the MSM and your government. You will never find the truth barking up that tree.
Tarpley expresses OPINION he offers no proof whatsoever that any of the hijackers were CIA]

False flags are not some difficult concept and understanding what the term means DOES NOT mean any specific event is a false flag

You will never find the truth on you tube videos
 
15th post
You believe the MSM and your government.
You've been invited numerous times to point out where the 9/11 Commission Report got it wrong.

You've been silent on the topic.

One can only conclude that they got it right if you can't point out what they got wrong.
 
As I said Tarpley explains a lot of it very well.

Once you understand false flags a bit, state sponsored terrorism makes more sense.

Watch the documentary Nato's Secret Armies.

The CIA, MI6, and Mossad have been deliberately killing innocent civilians for decades.

You believe the MSM and your government. You will never find the truth barking up that tree.

What did he explain?
Why does it support your claims?
Besides your feelings.
 
Israel Is Our Shield

Since our leadership class is so ignorant, and they brainwash us to follow their lead, it must be concluded that we'd be speaking Arabic or Farsi by now if some people had not wanted to live where they could speak Hebrew.
Sage,... I don't trust the "Talmudic Leadership" of the Nation of Israel.

Take a look at what happened to the USS Liberty during the "Six Day War".

And,..... Those "Talmudic Jews" are Light Years from the Biblical "Sons of Zadok
 
Back
Top Bottom