the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
Ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery ....that how it goes ?The only seed you are planting are the seeds of ignorance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery ....that how it goes ?The only seed you are planting are the seeds of ignorance.
Clearly I said Americans not other inferior nations.Actually the majority of rational, free-thinking individuals outside the USA are on my side. We see you as the wacked out conspiracy theorists, and the difference is, we know we're right.If you awaken one person you will have a little more than a dozen twoofers being laughed at by the nation instead an even dozen
None of which proves your various assertions.Try reading the report which is even better.
Like I said second hand claims are worthless which is why your assertions are self defeating
Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Clearly I meant uninformed Americans like you.Clearly I said Americans not other inferior nations.
The difference is that you hate being proven wrong and you know you are wrong.
You have no evidence.
No clearly you said outside of AmericaClearly I meant uninformed Americans like you.Clearly I said Americans not other inferior nations.Actually the majority of rational, free-thinking individuals outside the USA are on my side. We see you as the wacked out conspiracy theorists, and the difference is, we know we're right.If you awaken one person you will have a little more than a dozen twoofers being laughed at by the nation instead an even dozen
The difference is that you hate being proven wrong and you know you are wrong.
You have no evidence.
Whatever you say Huckleberry.Most Americans laugh at you.
Ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery ....that how it goes ?The only seed you are planting are the seeds of ignorance.
View attachment 240981
View attachment 240982
None of which proves your various assertions.Try reading the report which is even better.
Like I said second hand claims are worthless which is why your assertions are self defeating
Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Well here we go again.Whatever you say Huckleberry.Most Americans laugh at you.
Internet troll: A person, usually operating under a pseudonym, who posts deliberately provocative messages to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of provoking maximum disruption and argument. They are often paid by nefarious sources but sometime are motivated to do so for their own amusement. They often try to provoke dissension and doubt by writing dis-informational letters to the editors of newspapers.
Another good definition of an internet troll: A person who purposely and deliberately starts an online or media argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by other commenters. He will often use ad hominem attacks.
Weaponizing the Term « Conspiracy Theory »: Disinformation Agents and the CIA | Mondialisation - Centre de Recherche sur la Mondialisation
Who says it is unlikely ?None of which proves your various assertions.Try reading the report which is even better.
Like I said second hand claims are worthless which is why your assertions are self defeating
Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
Who says it is unlikely ?None of which proves your various assertions.Try reading the report which is even better.
Like I said second hand claims are worthless which is why your assertions are self defeating
Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
The plasco building in Tehran.Who says it is unlikely ?None of which proves your various assertions.Try reading the report which is even better.
Like I said second hand claims are worthless which is why your assertions are self defeating
Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
The plasco building in Tehran.Who says it is unlikely ?None of which proves your various assertions.Thats a government report straight from the NIST you idiot.
Maybe you noticed the heading...
"Due to a lapse in government funding, the majority of this website is not being updated until further notice."
NIST websites for programs using non-appropriated funds (NVLAP and PSCR) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as NVD) will continue to be available and updated.
Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you
And it wasThe plasco building in Tehran.Who says it is unlikely ?None of which proves your various assertions.
Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you
I said modern day building construction.
And it wasThe plasco building in Tehran.Who says it is unlikely ?Name a modern high rise taken down by a fire.
Not only is it extremely unlikely to happen it's also extremely unlikely it would fall in its own footprint.
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you
I said modern day building construction.
1962 is the modern eraAnd it wasThe plasco building in Tehran.Who says it is unlikely ?
It is unlikely or likely as anything else and how many towers have been hit by planes.
You are no authority.and you are wrong.
I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you
I said modern day building construction.
LOL...they're no better than the chinese.
Besides it was built in 1962 and was fraught with code violations.
In America it would have been condemned.
So no dice,try again.
That is because engineers are a dime a dozen but disagreement and argument from authority ids not evidence and they do not have evidence,There has never been any evidence of demolition s and the argument of controlled demo is self defeating and idiotic.Wired to blow.
View attachment 240446
A lot of engineers disagree.
9/11 destruction “controlled demolition” — fact or fiction? - constructconnect.com - Daily Commercial News
wrong again----both buildings were struck by planes. Lots of film-----and me--eyewitness.
See a good neurologist
What the hell are you even talking about?
Nobody is disputing that the Twin Towers were hit by planes.
actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did
I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.
And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?
wrong again----both buildings were struck by planes. Lots of film-----and me--eyewitness.
See a good neurologist
What the hell are you even talking about?
Nobody is disputing that the Twin Towers were hit by planes.
actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did
I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.
And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?
PHYSICS------blast injury------- what it does to PEOPLE----it also does to local structures.
Simple model for the simple minded------you don't have to be hit by a bomb in order to
DIE FROM A BOMB------in fact you do not have to be HIT by anything other than the force
of the explosion. The collapse of the towers created a HUGE OUTPUT OF ENERGY--
you remember ENERGY E
You do realize that not a single modern day high rise has ever collapsed due to fire right?
1962 is the modern eraAnd it wasThe plasco building in Tehran.I'll ask again.....
Name one modern day high rise that has been taken down by fire......I'll wait.
Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you
I said modern day building construction.
LOL...they're no better than the chinese.
Besides it was built in 1962 and was fraught with code violations.
In America it would have been condemned.
So no dice,try again.
You are wrong and ignorant proven fact