beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 45,008
- 16,753
- 2,250
Well we shall agree to disagree then, but stay tuned because you will be proven wrong about air supremacy not being the ultimate lynch pin in any war effort.Nukes are not a "war strategy". Nukes are political weapons, the idea of them being "military weapons" ended decades ago.
And you keep failing, because you can only revert back to WWII, when that foolish concept was dreamed up by Curtis LeMay. Which has never worked in reality.
And there as no real "air superiority" during WWI! Hell, the biggest threat during that war was not actually enemy aircraft, but fire from the trenches. And you do not even need "air superiority" to do recon missions.
As I said, you keep spinning in circles, and relying on theories from 70 years ago that never worked. As is obvious, as you can not seem to come up with a single example from after WWII. And even ignore obvious cases where the very concept was proven to be a failure.
Ukraine didn't start gaining ground until their drones started turning the tide of war back into their favor, and now Moscow is using the same tactics in order to gain back it's advantages in the conflict. Modern warfare is a back and forth learning experience for all those participating. As you see, the air war strategy is favored by both sides in hopes to gain the advantage for the troops and equipment to freely move forward in the ground war part of it.