Eaglekeeper
Rookie
- Jan 12, 2021
- 17
- 18
- 1
Well, I guess the friendly moderators were correct.Completely False and fabricated by you.... The first indication that something is amiss with their analysis is they also choose to ignore data prior to 80,000 years ago, when temperatures have been determined to have been several degrees warmer than any projected temperature from the models (think dinosaurs).
They have repeatedly tried to use the climate models to match what has happened in history, in order to validate them, and they have been incorrect in every case where peer review has validated the methods used.
NASA has done extensive data collection and analysis on all periods.
You're a total stupid **** and liar.
Just what this section needs... another RW clown.
Does USMB have a recruiter in a Right Wing High School?
`
`