2020 Ties for Hottest Year on Record, NASA Says (Nullfying 10,000 "it's cold this morning" posts here)

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
7,532
Reaction score
4,836
Points
1,050
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
69,499
Reaction score
23,749
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:





Yup, the scientific literature is filled with amateurs who made paradigm shifting discoveries because they weren't blinded by dogma.
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
7,532
Reaction score
4,836
Points
1,050
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:





Yup, the scientific literature is filled with amateurs who made paradigm shifting discoveries because they weren't blinded by dogma.
Anomalyboy is too ignorant to know about how many without college degrees did a lot for science they greatly advanced, even when has no degree at all for the field they advanced so famously.

Henrietta Swan Leavitt had no Astronomy degree, while she is the pioneer on Cepheid Variability and Luminosity.

Alfred Wegener who has NO Geology degree was the first to notice continental, biology and botany matches for both Atlantic coasts.

I have known this stuff from the 1970's, Anamolyboy still doesn't know.....
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
69,499
Reaction score
23,749
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:





Yup, the scientific literature is filled with amateurs who made paradigm shifting discoveries because they weren't blinded by dogma.
Anomalyboy is too ignorant to know about how many without college degrees did a lot for science they greatly advanced, even when has no degree at all for the field they advanced so famously.

Henrietta Swan Leavitt had no Astronomy degree, while she is the pioneer on Cepheid Variability and Luminosity.

Alfred Wegener who has NO Geology degree was the first to notice continental, biology and botany matches for both Atlantic coasts.





Wegener wasn't the first to come up with continental drift, he merely stated it better than anyone before him. I can't remember which English naturalist postulated on the theory in the 1600's but he was merely commenting on observations and ideas that began in the 1400's.
 
Last edited:

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
7,532
Reaction score
4,836
Points
1,050
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:





Yup, the scientific literature is filled with amateurs who made paradigm shifting discoveries because they weren't blinded by dogma.
Anomalyboy is too ignorant to know about how many without college degrees did a lot for science they greatly advanced, even when has no degree at all for the field they advanced so famously.

Henrietta Swan Leavitt had no Astronomy degree, while she is the pioneer on Cepheid Variability and Luminosity.

Alfred Wegener who has NO Geology degree was the first to notice continental, biology and botany matches for both Atlantic coasts.





Wegener wasn't the first to come up with continental drift, he merely stated it better than anyone before him. postulated on the theory in the 1600's
True, but since he did the main work of advancing it, he is the one being remembered for it. The point was he is an educated Meteorologist doing work as a Geologist without the degree.
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
69,499
Reaction score
23,749
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
You seem like some young irrelevant dude with no credentials.
My credentials are irrelevant because I'm deferring to scientists.







Appeal to authority is the biggest logical fallacy there is.
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:





Yup, the scientific literature is filled with amateurs who made paradigm shifting discoveries because they weren't blinded by dogma.
Anomalyboy is too ignorant to know about how many without college degrees did a lot for science they greatly advanced, even when has no degree at all for the field they advanced so famously.

Henrietta Swan Leavitt had no Astronomy degree, while she is the pioneer on Cepheid Variability and Luminosity.

Alfred Wegener who has NO Geology degree was the first to notice continental, biology and botany matches for both Atlantic coasts.





Wegener wasn't the first to come up with continental drift, he merely stated it better than anyone before him. postulated on the theory in the 1600's
True, but since he did the main work of advancing it, he is the one being remembered for it. The point was he is an educated Meteorologist doing work as a Geologist without the degree.




Yup, he was a true polymath.
 

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
No, it is because you have no idea what Dr. Mann has published, that is why you can't answer a simple question.

I have read two of his published papers, have you read any of his papers?

You think like a child, act like a child, you are a bottom dwelling child.
I'm a lot less hostile and insulting than you are, Mr. grown up. Maybe feeling ignorant is upsetting you. Mann is nothing but a distraction from the point I'm making, a point you have been deliberately ignoring.
 
Last edited:

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
He doesn't know who Milton Humason was, who discovered something big while he was a "mule skinner" for the Hooker Telescope....., when it was being built.

He doesn't know who Clyde Tombaugh was either who finds Pluto without a College degree.


:cool:
There is nobody on your side of the argument doing groundbreaking work. I'm not ignoring anybody's work. No new work is being done by your side. Scientists tell us what their work means and you people say "No, THIS is what your work means." You have nothing but deflections and anecdotes. There is no substance to your arguments.
 
Last edited:

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
Anomalyboy is too ignorant to know about how many without college degrees did a lot for science they greatly advanced, even when has no degree at all for the field they advanced so famously.

Henrietta Swan Leavitt had no Astronomy degree, while she is the pioneer on Cepheid Variability and Luminosity.

Alfred Wegener who has NO Geology degree was the first to notice continental, biology and botany matches for both Atlantic coasts.

I have known this stuff from the 1970's, Anamolyboy still doesn't know.....
Who is doing new work on your side of the argument? Nobody, that's who. You act like everybody is ignoring all of the great work being done by people proving AGW isn't real. That's not reality.
 

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
You people constantly run from and deflect the primary points here because you have nothing else. You're either being intentionally dishonest or you're so caught up in your denier nonsense that you'll bend yourself into a pretzel to avoid facing reality. Y'all are a bunch of arrogant and irrelevant nobodies with nothing substantive to back up your side of the argument. To real people of science your behavior is just gross and ignorant.
 

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
Cool story. Can you prove it?
It's plainly true because if it wasn't you would be trumpeting that stuff in defense of your position. All you have is these blog websites. They take the work of scientists and try to make it look like something it's not. The people that did those studies they point at don't agree with how you and those bloggers view AGW.
 

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,604
Points
903
You people are so detached from reality that you have to rely on ridiculous conspiracy theories to support your world view.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
64,525
Reaction score
12,707
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Cool story. Can you prove it?
It's plainly true because if it wasn't you would be trumpeting that stuff in defense of your position. All you have is these blog websites. They take the work of scientists and try to make it look like something it's not. The people that did those studies they point at don't agree with how you and those bloggers view AGW.
It's plainly true because ......

Your side is preventing publication?

Is that something you're proud of?

How do you feel about "Hide the decline"?
About "Mike's Nature Trick"?

Or was that before your time? Afraid to answer again?
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
64,525
Reaction score
12,707
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
You people are so detached from reality that you have to rely on ridiculous conspiracy theories to support your world view.
AGW believers would never interfere with skeptics?
Would never try to cut off funding or prevent publication?

That's ridiculous. DURR.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top