We’re experiencing Earth’s Hottest Weather in 120,000 Years, and it’s just getting Started

[Crick]

LOL!!!

Tell us how we know Earth's exact temperature during a full year from one layer of ice buried on top of one spot on Antarctica???

Are you actually this ignorant? Temperature is accurately proxied by O18/O16 ratios in air bubbles trapped in the ice. You really don't know diddly squat, do you.

Nashville, for example, had a record warm August in 2007. Then it had a record cold July in 2008, getting to 90 all of 4 times the entire month, even having two sunny days that did not reach 80F. To you fucked in the head retards, that is an "interglacial" in 2007 followed by a "glacial" in 2008...

The glacial-interglacial cycle is an oscillation in the average temperature of the planet, not Nashville, you ignorant bigot.

"Ding" said it was an "interglacial." You say it was a "glacial." Tell us, according to you, WHEN was the last "interglacial?"

Have you ever seen graphs like this? They get posted here all the time.

The Vostok Ice Core: Temperature, CO2 and CH4

In their seminal paper on the Vostok Ice Core, Petit et al (1999) [1] note that CO2 lags temperature during the onset of glaciations by several thousand years but offer no explanation. They also ob…

euanmearns.com

The high points are interglacials, the low points are glacials.

Your side makes the bullshit definitions, asshole.

Definitions in English are simply determined by common usage.

An interglacial period is a geological period of warmer temperatures that occurs between glacial periods during an ice age. During an interglacial period, glaciers retreat

My GOD!!! You actually made a correct observation.

So tell us, since 20k years ago massively failed, WHEN was the last "interglacial" where "glaciers retreated?"

How about the interglacial we're in right now?

 

[EMH]

Temperature is accurately proxied by O18/O16 ratios in air bubbles trapped in the ice

And precisely how do we TEST that accuracy?

LOL!!!

We just trust the taxpayer funded climate "scientists" right?

glacial-interglacial cycle is an oscillation in the average temperature of the planet

The ever changing definition of the bogus glacial/interglacial waste of taxpayer money...

From Google

"During an interglacial period, glaciers retreat"

So precisely WHEN did this last happen????

Have you ever seen graphs like this? They get posted here all the time.

Thanks, that is the Vostok Co2 data and a complete fudge of temperature next to it.

It can be said that "your speciality" is truly color fudge charts...



So apparently we had an "interglacial" about 125k years ago?

Funny, both Antarctica and Greenland, 97% of Earth ice today, both grew ice core layers straight through your "interglacial" period despite the definition of such a period being "glaciers retreat." They did not retreat. They expanded. But, hilariously enough, North America did have a lot of ice 125k years ago, and that all melted. So, during that "interglacial" Greenland and Antarctica continued to freeze while North America thawed... proving that Earth climate change is not planetary, but rather a summation of continents that change in 180 degrees the opposite direction at the same time, in Greenland/NA's case, right next to each other.

 

[Mashmont]

Yes June and July had many of the hottests says in 100,0000 years and look out for more in the new few years/decades, as our GHG Blankets is getting denser/warmer.

The Hill - 7/08/23

We’re experiencing Earth’s Hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started​

BY JEFF BERARDELLI - 07/08/23

(WFLA) — It’s quite the claim: This week, Earth broke an unofficial record for its hottest day in 120,000 years. Actually, the Earth broke that record three times — on Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday, according to the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer.

El Niño (a natural cycle) is just getting started. As it gets stronger, and adds more heat to Earth’s system, this summer will continue to set new all-time global records for hot days. And along with that, many other records will be shattered as well.


But no matter how hot it gets, the summer of 2023 will soon be considered a “cool” summer in a couple of decades amid the steady drumbeat of human-caused climate heating.

When will El Niño peak?
How can experts be so confident of these bold assertions? As a climate specialist, I’ll do my best to explain. It’s all fairly simple — and fully expected — by the climate science community.

First, researchers know using observations that temperatures over the past decade have been warmer than any ever seen since record-keeping began in the 1800s. Since then, Earth has warmed by 1.2 degrees Celsius (2 degrees Fahrenheit).

Scientists also know through sophisticated methods of examining copious climate clues in proxy data like tree rings, ice cores, ocean sediments, etc. that Earth’s average temperature has not been this warm since the ice age ended 20,000 years ago.
[......]

We’re experiencing Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started

As hot as it is now, the summer of 2023 might be considered a “cool” summer to future generations.

thehill.com

`
https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4086841-were-experiencing-earths-hottest-weather-in-120000-years-and-its-just-getting-started/&picture=https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/AP23179536796126-e1688785695976.jpg?w=900&title=We’re experiencing Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started&description=As hot as it is now, the summer of 2023 might be considered a "cool" summer to future generations.

Yawn. Today's high here was 74, ten degrees less than the average. Tonight it will be in the 50s. Love the climate change.

 

[Crick]

Yawn. Today's high here was 74, ten degrees less than the average. Tonight it will be in the 50s. Love the climate change.

Love folks who, despite decades of news and information about climate change, don't understand the difference between weather and climate

 

[EMH]

Love folks who, despite decades of news and information about climate change, don't understand the difference between weather and climate

which is why the Co2 FRAUD screams about "extreme heat" aka hot weather in summer, and lies its ass off about its historical signifigance, because every time we check, there isn't jack historically. Nashville has no record highs and one record low this year, remember that when your FRAUD claims "warmest year ever" again...

Good thing about the Co2 FRAUD lying about ocean temps... WE HAVE CANE DATA, and it shows record decade for canes is 1940s, second strongest the 1890s... which puts the Co2 FRAUD's claim about ocean "warming" in the watery grave it deserves....

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

www.nhc.noaa.gov

 

[Mashmont]

Love folks who, despite decades of news and information about climate change, don't understand the difference between weather and climate

I remember last summer when it was 110 for a few days in Phoenix, and the climate change nuts were going on about it. I guess they didn't understand the difference between weather and climate.

 

[Crick]

I remember last summer when it was 110 for a few days in Phoenix, and the climate change nuts were going on about it. I guess they didn't understand the difference between weather and climate.

Well, it seems someone doesn't.

 

[Mashmont]

Well, it seems someone doesn't.

Letwingers use weather when it suits their purposes; "climate" when it doesn't. It's all a scam.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Yes June and July had many of the hottests says in 100,0000 years and look out for more in the new few years/decades, as our GHG Blankets is getting denser/warmer.

The Hill - 7/08/23

We’re experiencing Earth’s Hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started​

BY JEFF BERARDELLI - 07/08/23

(WFLA) — It’s quite the claim: This week, Earth broke an unofficial record for its hottest day in 120,000 years. Actually, the Earth broke that record three times — on Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday, according to the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer.

El Niño (a natural cycle) is just getting started. As it gets stronger, and adds more heat to Earth’s system, this summer will continue to set new all-time global records for hot days. And along with that, many other records will be shattered as well.


But no matter how hot it gets, the summer of 2023 will soon be considered a “cool” summer in a couple of decades amid the steady drumbeat of human-caused climate heating.

When will El Niño peak?
How can experts be so confident of these bold assertions? As a climate specialist, I’ll do my best to explain. It’s all fairly simple — and fully expected — by the climate science community.

First, researchers know using observations that temperatures over the past decade have been warmer than any ever seen since record-keeping began in the 1800s. Since then, Earth has warmed by 1.2 degrees Celsius (2 degrees Fahrenheit).

Scientists also know through sophisticated methods of examining copious climate clues in proxy data like tree rings, ice cores, ocean sediments, etc. that Earth’s average temperature has not been this warm since the ice age ended 20,000 years ago.
[......]

We’re experiencing Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started

As hot as it is now, the summer of 2023 might be considered a “cool” summer to future generations.

thehill.com

`
https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4086841-were-experiencing-earths-hottest-weather-in-120000-years-and-its-just-getting-started/&picture=https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/AP23179536796126-e1688785695976.jpg?w=900&title=We’re experiencing Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years, and it’s just getting started&description=As hot as it is now, the summer of 2023 might be considered a "cool" summer to future generations.

Is there a way we can make it hotter, faster ?

I love these hot days. Not looking forward to fall. I live in Arizona.

 

[Crick]

Is there a way we can make it hotter, faster ?

Just keep doing what you're doing.

 

[Slyhunter]

Is there a way we can make it hotter, faster ?

I love these hot days. Not looking forward to fall. I live in Arizona.

I miss that dry heat, I live in Florida.

 

[EMH]

Crock was asked if the "temperature readings" from the ice cores have ever been "tested" for "accuracy."

The answer is clearly NO.

What was Earth's temperature 10k years ago?

Does anyone here really believe we can get an "accurate reading" of that from one slice of an ice core???

We get Co2 readings from ice cores, and those should be accurate, straightforward.

Temperature, from an ice core....

Come on, man....

 

[Mac-7]

We’re experiencing Earth’s Hottest Weather in 120,000 Years, and it’s just getting Started​

There you have it folks

We’re all gonna die

 

[EMH]

We’re experiencing Earth’s Hottest Weather in 120,000 Years, and it’s just getting Started​

There you have it folks

We’re all gonna die

all over a complete lie that never should've gotten off the ground....






THIS is all we ever needed, and should've shut it down decades ago...


THEORY = increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming

DATA = two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."



Translation from NBC slant = the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere during decades of rising Co2


Science says = THEORY REJECTED

politicized "the science" "climate science" says FUDGE THE DATA AND CLAIM "WARMING" THAT DOES NOT EXIST

 

[HikerGuy83]

Crock

I love it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How far back would you go?

^ Pretending this technology gave readings accurate to a tenth of a degree makes us suspect your methodology and motives

Tell us how you get reading of "deep ocean" temperatures from 1850

 

[Crick]

^ Pretending this technology gave readings accurate to a tenth of a degree makes us suspect your methodology and motives

Tell us how you get reading of "deep ocean" temperatures from 1850

So, how far back would you go?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, how far back would you go?

That’s a statistics question

You cannot have any meaningful degree of accuracy to compare 1850 to today. There’s no significant dataset of atmosphere and ocean readings that far back, even the land readings are probably +- at least a full degree.

 

[Crick]

That’s a statistics question

You cannot have any meaningful degree of accuracy to compare 1850 to today. There’s no significant dataset of atmosphere and ocean readings that far back, even the land readings are probably +- at least a full degree.

The question is when you think the errors have become too large for the data to retain any meaninfulness. And, of course, without spending an enormous amount of time studying the actual data and its errors can you come to any conclusion. But that's precisely what the climate and weather science community have done and after years of looking at the issue, they've decided 1850 was the limit. I think we should just go with that. As best as can be managed, it doesn't introduce bias, just uncertainty.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The question is when you think the errors have become too large for the data to retain any meaninfulness. And, of course, without spending an enormous amount of time studying the actual data and its errors can you come to any conclusion. But that's precisely what the climate and weather science community have done and after years of looking at the issue, they've decided 1850 was the limit. I think we should just go with that. As best as can be managed, it doesn't introduce bias, just uncertainty.

That’s precisely where the Theory starts to falls apart!

Put aside the now $3 trillion annual price tag and just look at the math and statistics. There is no dataset to have any confidence in the numbers from 1850, 60, 70, 1900, even 1930!

Why should anyone rely on “facts” with no evidence?

The modern dataset relies heavily on deep ocean temperatures, when do we have any reading at all on that?