Ah, the Copenhagen Cons are going full steam ahead, and the mainstream media outlets are simply parroting the claims of 2009 being the 5th warmest year on record, and the current decade as the warmest on record.
And yet, even within the announcements we see the hedging, which is being under reported.
From Reuters...
The WMO used British -- including CRU -- and two U.S. data sources for its temperature analysis. "The three separately show almost identical results," said Jarraud.
The fact that the record for the hottest year has not been broken since 1998 has helped fuel arguments from a small minority of scientists that climate change may not be as severe as feared.
But MetOffice Hadley Centre's Pope said that temperatures had "climbed slightly" in the past decade. "There hasn't been a cooling (since the 1998 spike)," she said.
The decade 2000-2009 was 0.4 degrees Celsius above the 1961-1990 average, while the 1990s decade was 0.23 degrees higher, said Pope.
So they are utilizing a 1961-1990 AVERAGE as a basis for present comparison??? Did we not have scientists and media screaming of global cooling during much of that 1961-1990 period? So they are utilzing a colder than average time period - removing the warmer decades of the 1930s and 1940s, to do YET ANOTHER temperature sleight of hand.
UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE.
2009 set to be fifth warmest year on record | Green Business | Reuters
And yet, even within the announcements we see the hedging, which is being under reported.
From Reuters...
The WMO used British -- including CRU -- and two U.S. data sources for its temperature analysis. "The three separately show almost identical results," said Jarraud.
The fact that the record for the hottest year has not been broken since 1998 has helped fuel arguments from a small minority of scientists that climate change may not be as severe as feared.
But MetOffice Hadley Centre's Pope said that temperatures had "climbed slightly" in the past decade. "There hasn't been a cooling (since the 1998 spike)," she said.
The decade 2000-2009 was 0.4 degrees Celsius above the 1961-1990 average, while the 1990s decade was 0.23 degrees higher, said Pope.
So they are utilizing a 1961-1990 AVERAGE as a basis for present comparison??? Did we not have scientists and media screaming of global cooling during much of that 1961-1990 period? So they are utilzing a colder than average time period - removing the warmer decades of the 1930s and 1940s, to do YET ANOTHER temperature sleight of hand.
UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE.
2009 set to be fifth warmest year on record | Green Business | Reuters