Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Family Research Council has repeatedly argued that gay men are more likely than others to molest children. Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association has said that Hitler was gay and that homosexuality caused the Holocaust. To call such claims misinformed is being generousthey have been repeatedly and roundly debunked. Disseminating these claims doesn't promote discussion; it promotes prejudice and hatred.
Neither the Family Research Council nor the American Family Association condones criminal behavior. But by spreading falsehoods and propaganda, such groups lend ideas and credibility to more extremist elements.
The SPLC has been clear and consistent as to what it means by hate group. Applying the term to high-profile anti-gay organizations isn't just politics. It's asserting that facts matter, that words have consequences and that hate is hateregardless of how many people support it.
Spreading lies | The Christian Century
The Family Research Council has repeatedly argued that gay men are more likely than others to molest children. Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association has said that Hitler was gay and that homosexuality caused the Holocaust. To call such claims misinformed is being generousthey have been repeatedly and roundly debunked. Disseminating these claims doesn't promote discussion; it promotes prejudice and hatred.
Neither the Family Research Council nor the American Family Association condones criminal behavior. But by spreading falsehoods and propaganda, such groups lend ideas and credibility to more extremist elements.
The SPLC has been clear and consistent as to what it means by hate group. Applying the term to high-profile anti-gay organizations isn't just politics. It's asserting that facts matter, that words have consequences and that hate is hateregardless of how many people support it.
Spreading lies | The Christian Century
Ever wonder why it took so long for homosexual activists to start banning NAMBLA from their meetings?
Christian Scott Lively is on a worldwide anti-gay campaign.
Scott Lively is known in the United States for being outspoken against homosexuality and the LGBT lobby, as well as occasional Holocaust revisionism. While his message has had increasingly less traction at home in the United States, Lively has emerged as a tireless international campaigner against the threat of homosexuality faced by other nations, from Russia to Ugandaand now to Moldova.
You can see firsthand the sort of rhetoric Mr. Lively employs (and the kind of reception he receives) at his sermons abroad in this YouTube clip from Novosibirsk, Russia. Such messages have been particularly welcome by certain religious and other leaders in Uganda, where the Anti-Homosexuality Bill was introduced in 2009 after a similar visit by Lively. Following an international outcry, the Bills principle sponsor, MP David Bahati, temporarily tabled the billwhich proposes life imprisonment for the offense of homosexualityalthough has said that he plans to reintroduce it. President Museveni promised to veto this legislation should it make it through the Ugandas Parliament, although the very discussion of the bill and its contents has contributed to a hateful climate for Ugandas lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) individuals.
Homosexuality is precisely what Scott Lively went to combat in Moldova. As reported by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Lively reacted to the new antidiscrimination bill that contained a sexual orientation clause by arguing that ending discrimination against gays would be the first step towards the homosexualization of society and would be followed by granting gay people the right to marry and adopt children. The proposed bill, which would bring Moldova a step closer to improved relations with the European Union, was also condemned by the Moldovan Orthodox Church and is vehemently opposed by Livelys main allies in the country
Two Influential Americans Make Separate Visits to Europe
So what? Are we supposed to 'hate' him? Do you 'hate' him and others like him? How are you any different than they are?
So what? Fine. He's evil, if you like his work, support him. Just don't try and bullshit me about how moderate you are.
It hasn't been passed yet.
No? But it's been two years? And you don't think people who knowingly spread AIDS to others should be prosecuted? Should they face the death penalty for basically giving the death penalty to someone they had sex with?
No. I don't support the death penalty. Do you?
"Mr. Sharlet claims I told him that I had paid a visit to Mr. Bahati in Kampala to assure him that he remains in good standing despite my personal opposition to the bill. The meeting was not to tell Mr. Bahati that he was in good standing, whatever that means, it was to discuss my concerns with the bill. Indeed, on NPRs Fresh Air episode of August 25, 2010, Mr. Sharlet says that, after he met with me, Mr. Bahati was upset because he had come into a sort of a schism with the group. Mr. Sharlets reporting on this subject is inconsistent, to put the best light on it.
Mr. Sharlet gives me credit for being vocal about my opposition to the bill, but claims that theres somehow a profound lack of accountability at every other level. Mr. Sharlet knows that every American with any connection to Uganda for the Fellowship has condemned the bill. When Mr. Bahati first discussed the possibility of this bill, a close associate of the Fellowship told him it was a bad idea, making us the first group in the world to condemn the legislation since, under Mr. Sharlets approach of guilt by association, we must also have blessing by association."
Bob Hunter and Jeff Sharlet: An Exchange (Harper's Magazine)
Sky's full of shit.
I pulled up a load of information on this a while back but I don't remember what thread it was in. I think it was some garbage rtard was spewing at the time. It included a history of the situation in Uganda and Bahati specifically.
No? But it's been two years? And you don't think people who knowingly spread AIDS to others should be prosecuted? Should they face the death penalty for basically giving the death penalty to someone they had sex with?
No. I don't support the death penalty. Do you?
Oh, okay, I'll play your game then. I guess you think it's perfectly fine for people with Aids to go around having sex without disclosing their condition and basically giving their sex partners a death penalty. Nice to know that you're okay with that, and that there should be no punishment for their crime, how pathetic. And yes, I absolutely support the death penalty in specific cases.
If Sky is a buddhist, so are the muslims.
I have a feeling Buddha's position on her would be "would you please shut the fuck up?"
"Mr. Sharlet claims I told him that I had paid a visit to Mr. Bahati in Kampala to assure him that he remains in good standing despite my personal opposition to the bill. The meeting was not to tell Mr. Bahati that he was in “good standing,” whatever that means, it was to discuss my concerns with the bill. Indeed, on NPR’s Fresh Air episode of August 25, 2010, Mr. Sharlet says that, after he met with me, Mr. Bahati “was upset because he had come into a sort of a schism with the group.” Mr. Sharlet’s reporting on this subject is inconsistent, to put the best light on it.
Mr. Sharlet gives me credit for being vocal about my opposition to the bill, but claims that there’s somehow a “profound lack of accountability at every other level.” Mr. Sharlet knows that every American with any connection to Uganda for the Fellowship has condemned the bill. When Mr. Bahati first discussed the possibility of this bill, a close associate of the Fellowship told him it was a bad idea, making us the first group in the world to condemn the legislation since, under Mr. Sharlet’s approach of guilt by association, we must also have blessing by association."
Bob Hunter and Jeff Sharlet: An Exchange (Harper's Magazine)
Sky's full of shit.
I pulled up a load of information on this a while back but I don't remember what thread it was in. I think it was some garbage rtard was spewing at the time. It included a history of the situation in Uganda and Bahati specifically.
I've shown this information to her many months ago, several times now. She continues to try to imply that it's a 'kill gays' bill whenever it's not, and that American churches are supporting the 'killing of gays' in Uganda when that's not anywhere near the truth. But, that's the only way she can hold onto her hatred, I think she believes her own lies. It's sad.
"I don't hate you but I want to deny you equal protection under the law".
WTF?
Yeah, right! That makes a lot of sense! LOL.
I would rather they just hated me.
No wonder homosexuals are pissed.
No. I don't support the death penalty. Do you?
Oh, okay, I'll play your game then. I guess you think it's perfectly fine for people with Aids to go around having sex without disclosing their condition and basically giving their sex partners a death penalty. Nice to know that you're okay with that, and that there should be no punishment for their crime, how pathetic. And yes, I absolutely support the death penalty in specific cases.
Yes. I see your game. I don't support the death penalty so you assume I think there should be no consequences for disclosing AIDS to your sex partners. I never said it was 'perfectly fine' for people with AIDS to infect their partners without them knowing. It is a crime. There should be consequences, just not the death penalty.
Nice to know how you operate, pathetic.
"Mr. Sharlet claims I told him that I had paid a visit to Mr. Bahati in Kampala to assure him that he remains in good standing despite my personal opposition to the bill. The meeting was not to tell Mr. Bahati that he was in good standing, whatever that means, it was to discuss my concerns with the bill. Indeed, on NPRs Fresh Air episode of August 25, 2010, Mr. Sharlet says that, after he met with me, Mr. Bahati was upset because he had come into a sort of a schism with the group. Mr. Sharlets reporting on this subject is inconsistent, to put the best light on it.
Mr. Sharlet gives me credit for being vocal about my opposition to the bill, but claims that theres somehow a profound lack of accountability at every other level. Mr. Sharlet knows that every American with any connection to Uganda for the Fellowship has condemned the bill. When Mr. Bahati first discussed the possibility of this bill, a close associate of the Fellowship told him it was a bad idea, making us the first group in the world to condemn the legislation since, under Mr. Sharlets approach of guilt by association, we must also have blessing by association."
Bob Hunter and Jeff Sharlet: An Exchange (Harper's Magazine)
Sky's full of shit.
I pulled up a load of information on this a while back but I don't remember what thread it was in. I think it was some garbage rtard was spewing at the time. It included a history of the situation in Uganda and Bahati specifically.
I've shown this information to her many months ago, several times now. She continues to try to imply that it's a 'kill gays' bill whenever it's not, and that American churches are supporting the 'killing of gays' in Uganda when that's not anywhere near the truth. But, that's the only way she can hold onto her hatred, I think she believes her own lies. It's sad.
It was a kill gays bill. It's been changed to be a life imprisonment for gays bill. The Church supported Ssempa when it was a kill gays bill. They changed their tune when it became public knowledge that they supported Ssempa.
I absolutely oppose this group, Family Research Council. I am very surprised you all defend them. Scott Lively absolutely bragged about his work in Uganda as 'dropping sa nuclear bomb on gay people'. Lively is evil and I oppose evil.
I do not hate Lively or anyone else. I pray he wakes up before he dies.
So what? Are we supposed to 'hate' him? Do you 'hate' him and others like him? How are you any different than they are?
So what? Fine. He's evil, if you like his work, support him. Just don't try and bullshit me about how moderate you are.
I don't have to 'bullshit' you about anything. You're the one that has to bullshit and put words in people's mouths that they didn't say in order to justify your hatred and bias. I asked you a question. Do you hate him? How are you any better than he is? Why do you only give a damn about anything that has to do with gay people? Is that all you care about? Where is your caring and compassion for those that are different from you? You expect others to care about people and ideas that are different than theirs, yet you're not willing to step up to the plate and do the same. That's called hypocrisy Sky, and you are full of it.