Why can't liberals be honest about ANYTHING?

[bobcollum]

Liberals can't be honest about their intentions or they wouldn't be elected.

They must lie about themselves, then lie about the intentions of their opponents.

Sadly, their voter base is very compliant and very dense, and swallows it all whole, without so much as a sniff.

 

[Oldguy]

Not constitutionally. .

Prove it. I'll bet you can't.

(Hint: Start with the National Road, circa 1811.)

 

[P@triot]

What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" rofl. I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)

So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Socialism is taking money from someone who earned it, and handing it to others simply because they need it.

How exactly do you equate that to the military? Those men and women are EARNING their pay for work served. Trying to make this case is like claiming congress is "socialism" because we pay them to do a job....

Please try and keep up. Or at least ask your mom what these terms mean before commenting on them

 

[P@triot]

I was just looking at all the corporate campaign contributions to Obama for this recent election.

Too bad you couldn't relay this info to them quicker Rottie, they inadvertently supported someone that's looking to take full control of their company and profits.

They must not be very bright.

Well duh! The only one "not very bright" is YOU for being shocked at this "epiphany" you just had....

This story (had you not been too lazy to click on it and read it) was about CEO Jeff Immelt praising communism and supporting Obama.

Seriously folks, you can't make this stuff up. Ole' Bob here thought he just came to some ground breaking conclusion. God damn is that funny....

 

[Sallow]

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" rofl. I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)

So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point!

No.

It's socialist.

 

[Oldguy]

Socialism is taking money from someone who earned it, and handing it to others simply because they need it.

How exactly do you equate that to the military? Those men and women are EARNING their pay for work served.

But..they don't NEED to make an income to support their families?

Trying to make this case is like claiming congress is "socialism" because we pay them to do a job....

If the money to pay them for their work comes from someone else, how is it NOT socialism by your definition? How is it not redistributing MY money to someone else?

 

[P@triot]

So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point!

Defense is income redistribution: Take from the citizens and give to the defense industry. And, income redistribution is socialist...right?

They don't "give it" to the defense industry (seriously, come on now, you can't be that stupid) .

If a man goes out and builds a tank, and the government buys that tank from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid. That is not socialism. If another man goes out and builds battle ships, and the government buys those battleships from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid.

Man alive, how do you function in life? Your IQ can't be above 7 if you truly believe the nonsense you are spewing.

 

[bobcollum]

I was just looking at all the corporate campaign contributions to Obama for this recent election.

Too bad you couldn't relay this info to them quicker Rottie, they inadvertently supported someone that's looking to take full control of their company and profits.

They must not be very bright.

Well duh! The only one "not very bright" is YOU for being shocked at this "epiphany" you just had....

This story (had you not been too lazy to click on it and read it) was about CEO Jeff Immelt praising communism and supporting Obama.

Seriously folks, you can't make this stuff up. Ole' Bob here thought he just came to some ground breaking conclusion. God damn is that funny....

Please explain how state-control of these corporations will benefit those that now profit from it.

 

[Sallow]

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" rofl. I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)

So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Socialism is taking money from someone who earned it, and handing it to others simply because they need it.

How exactly do you equate that to the military? Those men and women are EARNING their pay for work served. Trying to make this case is like claiming congress is "socialism" because we pay them to do a job....

Please try and keep up. Or at least ask your mom what these terms mean before commenting on them

By your OWN DEFINITION.

The military is socialism.

 

[Sallow]

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point!

Defense is income redistribution: Take from the citizens and give to the defense industry. And, income redistribution is socialist...right?

They don't "give it" to the defense industry (seriously, come on now, you can't be that stupid) .

If a man goes out and builds a tank, and the government buys that tank from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid. That is not socialism. If another man goes out and builds battle ships, and the government buys those battleships from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid.

Man alive, how do you function in life? Your IQ can't be above 7 if you truly believe the nonsense you are spewing.

No it's not.

 

[Oldguy]

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point!

Defense is income redistribution: Take from the citizens and give to the defense industry. And, income redistribution is socialist...right?

They don't "give it" to the defense industry (seriously, come on now, you can't be that stupid) .

If a man goes out and builds a tank, and the government buys that tank from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid. That is not socialism. If another man goes out and builds battle ships, and the government buys those battleships from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid.

Man alive, how do you function in life? Your IQ can't be above 7 if you truly believe the nonsense you are spewing.

So...it's only socialism if the government gives him money and he DOESN'T build a tank? That is, if the government gets nothing in return...right?

Ok. Then...is it socialism when the government pays a farmer to NOT grow a crop? Careful now...the GOP has supported that for decades.

But, let's get personal. The government pays ME not to work. Is that socialism? Why or why not?

And, by the way, you never did define socialism like I asked you to.

 

[P@triot]

Socialism is taking money from someone who earned it, and handing it to others simply because they need it.

How exactly do you equate that to the military? Those men and women are EARNING their pay for work served.

But..they don't NEED to make an income to support their families?

Trying to make this case is like claiming congress is "socialism" because we pay them to do a job....

If the money to pay them for their work comes from someone else, how is it NOT socialism by your definition? How is it not redistributing MY money to someone else?

When you pay for a product or service, that is Capitalism.

Guess what, every dollar Bill Gates made "came from someone else". He didn't buy his own products!!!!

This is humiliating for you. You're coming across like a monkey trained on a keyboard. Your claiming that normal capitalism is socialism just because you're desperate for socialism and you want to make it appear as "harmless" and "normal".

Come on man, if you're going to make an argument, it has to be at least coherent. It has to have an ounce of sanity to it...

 

[Oldguy]

I was just looking at all the corporate campaign contributions to Obama for this recent election.

Too bad you couldn't relay this info to them quicker Rottie, they inadvertently supported someone that's looking to take full control of their company and profits.

They must not be very bright.

Well duh! The only one "not very bright" is YOU for being shocked at this "epiphany" you just had....

This story (had you not been too lazy to click on it and read it) was about CEO Jeff Immelt praising communism and supporting Obama.

Seriously folks, you can't make this stuff up. Ole' Bob here thought he just came to some ground breaking conclusion. God damn is that funny....

Please explain how state-control of these corporations will benefit those that now profit from it.

Please show me where anybody is advocating state control of those corporations.

 

[P@triot]

Defense is income redistribution: Take from the citizens and give to the defense industry. And, income redistribution is socialist...right?

They don't "give it" to the defense industry (seriously, come on now, you can't be that stupid) .

If a man goes out and builds a tank, and the government buys that tank from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid. That is not socialism. If another man goes out and builds battle ships, and the government buys those battleships from him, that is CAPITALISM, stupid.

Man alive, how do you function in life? Your IQ can't be above 7 if you truly believe the nonsense you are spewing.

No it's not.

 

[Oldguy]

Socialism is taking money from someone who earned it, and handing it to others simply because they need it.

How exactly do you equate that to the military? Those men and women are EARNING their pay for work served.

But..they don't NEED to make an income to support their families?

Trying to make this case is like claiming congress is "socialism" because we pay them to do a job....

If the money to pay them for their work comes from someone else, how is it NOT socialism by your definition? How is it not redistributing MY money to someone else?

When you pay for a product or service, that is Capitalism.

Guess what, every dollar Bill Gates made "came from someone else". He didn't buy his own products!!!!

This is humiliating for you. You're coming across like a monkey trained on a keyboard. Your claiming that normal capitalism is socialism just because you're desperate for socialism and you want to make it appear as "harmless" and "normal".

Come on man, if you're going to make an argument, it has to be at least coherent. It has to have an ounce of sanity to it...

Come on man. How is capitalism not a form of socialism? It takes from one and gives to another...right?

(Hint: There IS an explanation. Let's see if you know what it is.)

 

[bobcollum]

Well duh! The only one "not very bright" is YOU for being shocked at this "epiphany" you just had....

This story (had you not been too lazy to click on it and read it) was about CEO Jeff Immelt praising communism and supporting Obama.

Seriously folks, you can't make this stuff up. Ole' Bob here thought he just came to some ground breaking conclusion. God damn is that funny....

Please explain how state-control of these corporations will benefit those that now profit from it.

Please show me where anybody is advocating state control of those corporations.

Excuse me?

I think you're confused.

I'm asking rot-brain, why these CEOs are praising a system that would strip their stake in the company away.

 

[Oldguy]

Please explain how state-control of these corporations will benefit those that now profit from it.

Please show me where anybody is advocating state control of those corporations.

Excuse me?

I think you're confused.

I'm asking rot-brain, why these CEOs are praising a system that would strip their stake in the company away.

And, I'm asking YOU to show me where anybody is advocating state control of those companies. I guess I should qualify that and say, "Anybody in the Obama administration."

 

[bobcollum]

Rot-Face falls for the misconception that more smilies convey anything other than severe retardation.

 

[bobcollum]

Please show me where anybody is advocating state control of those corporations.

Excuse me?

I think you're confused.

I'm asking rot-brain, why these CEOs are praising a system that would strip their stake in the company away.

And, I'm asking YOU to show me where anybody is advocating state control of those companies.

That's what would happen in a Socialist, and progressing to a Communist society, would it not?

 

[LoneLaugher]

This place really needs a yawning emoticon.

Is that dog in his avatar yawning? I think it is.