Judge Aileen Cannon “Comes Out Swinging” and Delivers Blow to Jack Smith in Classified Documents Case – Liberals Scream for her Dismissal Afterwards

[surada]

This was a sound reason. You just want to see Trump in prison.

Doesn't everyone?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

~~~~~~
Really? So when is Judge Tanya Chutkan going to be dismissed for her blatant bias?

Yall could have dismissed her at the Senate hearings -- but Republicans were too busy confirming her 95-0

If she was this bad of a judge, they had their chance to bring that up then.....which tells me all of this whining about her now is because she is the black judge overseeing the trial of their cult leader....which isn't a legal stance..

 

[surada]

Yall could have dismissed her at the Senate hearings -- but Republicans were too busy confirming her 95-0

If she was this bad of a judge, they had their chance to bring that up then.....which tells me all of this whining about her now is because she is the black judge overseeing the trial of their cult leader....which isn't a legal stance..

Republicans confirmed her in a big way ... That's for certain.

 

[Blaster]

Doesn't everyone?

Only retards like you.

 

[Smokin' OP]

August 4 2023
Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon closed jury selection for the trial of an Alabama man — accused by federal prosecutors of running a website with images of child sex abuse — to the defendant’s family and the general public, a trial transcript obtained by Reuters showed. A defendant’s right to a public trial is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s Sixth Amendment.


Cannon, a 42-year-old former federal prosecutor appointed by Trump to the bench in 2020 late in his presidency, also neglected to swear in the prospective jury pool — an obligatory procedure in which people who may serve on the panel pledge to tell the truth during the selection process. This error forced Cannon to re-start jury selection before the trial ended abruptly with defendant William Spearman pleading guilty as part of an agreement with prosecutors.

In Cannon’s decision to close jury selection, the judge cited space restrictions in her small courtroom at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida.

Legal experts said closing a courtroom to the public has been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a “structural error” — a mistake so significant that it can invalidate a criminal trial because it strikes at the heart of the entire process. A public trial also has been found to implicate First Amendment rights of freedom of assembly, speech and press.

As a judge, Cannon so far has presided over four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts. She previously also worked on four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts when she served a federal prosecutor from 2013 to 2020, according to a questionnaire she filled out before the Senate confirmed her as a judge.

Yeah, it shows.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

August 4 2023
Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon closed jury selection for the trial of an Alabama man — accused by federal prosecutors of running a website with images of child sex abuse — to the defendant’s family and the general public, a trial transcript obtained by Reuters showed. A defendant’s right to a public trial is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s Sixth Amendment.


Cannon, a 42-year-old former federal prosecutor appointed by Trump to the bench in 2020 late in his presidency, also neglected to swear in the prospective jury pool — an obligatory procedure in which people who may serve on the panel pledge to tell the truth during the selection process. This error forced Cannon to re-start jury selection before the trial ended abruptly with defendant William Spearman pleading guilty as part of an agreement with prosecutors.

In Cannon’s decision to close jury selection, the judge cited space restrictions in her small courtroom at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida.

Legal experts said closing a courtroom to the public has been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a “structural error” — a mistake so significant that it can invalidate a criminal trial because it strikes at the heart of the entire process. A public trial also has been found to implicate First Amendment rights of freedom of assembly, speech and press.

As a judge, Cannon so far has presided over four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts. She previously also worked on four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts when she served a federal prosecutor from 2013 to 2020, according to a questionnaire she filled out before the Senate confirmed her as a judge.

Yeah, it shows.

LMAO Is that the best that Florida can do ? She nearly let a paedo go free because she didnt understand the procedure.

 

[mamooth]

who's gonna remove her? and what is absurd about the ruling?

Because it's completely legal and normal to use evidence from out-of-district grand juries. The law specifically says it's okay.

And because the Trump team didn't raise the defense. Judge Cannon raised it. It's not a judge' s job to fake crazy law-defying rulings on behalf of one side, and doing so indicates blatant bias.

 

[Smokin' OP]

LMAO Is that the best that Florida can do ? She nearly let a paedo go free because she didnt understand the procedure.

"Only the BEST" ..........

As a judge, Cannon so far has presided over four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts. She previously also worked on four criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts when she served a federal prosecutor from 2013 to 2020, according to a questionnaire she filled out before the Senate confirmed her as a judge.

"Believe me".

 

[marvin martian]

Judge Aileen Cannon “Comes Out Swinging” and Delivers Blow to Jack Smith in Classified Documents Case – Liberals Scream for her Dismissal Afterwards​

JUST IN: Judge Aileen Cannon "Comes Out Swinging" and Delivers Blow to Jack Smith in Classified Documents Case - Liberals Scream for her Dismissal Afterwards | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

Judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District for Florida federal court delivered a blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump regarding the “classified documents” case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

7 Aug 2023 ~~ By Cullen Linebarger

Judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District for Florida federal court delivered a blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump regarding the “classified documents” case. In their process, she also caused the liberals to go into unhinged meltdowns where they demanded her dismissal. Previous reports on her coverage can be found here and here.
As previously covered by Cristina Laila, Cannon was appointed to oversee the classified documents case to the chagrin of liberals everywhere. More examples of her coverage can be found here and here.
As Politico’s Kyle Cheney reported, Cannon struck down two of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sealed filings in her ruling today. Cheney said she came out swinging.

Judge Cannon comes out swinging at special counsel this morning, striking two of prosecutors’ sealed filings and demanding an explanation of “the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate” the docs case.​

​

~Snip~
The Gateway Pundit’s Cristina Laila previously reported that this is not the first time Jack Smith has been smacked down by Cannon. She had previously denied motions to keep the government’s motion government’s motion to keep a list of 84 witnesses under wraps.
She also denied his request to speed up the sharing of classified documents.


Commentary:
Way to go Judge Cannon, this is a witch hunt and political interference.
The key is the DSA/Democrats want to run another `Star Chamber` operation where they can alter evidence and attest to it with no public oversight. Basic fairness allows a defendant to face his accusers and the right to impeach same witnesses.
Next thing you know, Smith will hire (never disbarred) DOJ Attorney Clinesmith to provide err "improved" evidence.
Or, Where can the DOJ find a corrupt Judge when they need one?
It only takes ONE legit judge to blow their cover.
It takes ONE legit Sherriff and District Attorney combo in the Swing States to bust up the Election Racketeering.
Note Biden won fewer districts than any president ever. He won them by incredible unfathomable margins. They knew the rules were self written in those counties and there would be no policing or conscience required.
Maoist/DSA Democrats whine when they can't get their fraudulent trials held in places like DC or NY where the judges are ideologically biased, corrupted and the Juries are biased and tainted against anyone and anything conservative.
Democrats are the criminals and traitors that Leaked Grand Jury Evidence to the Quisling Media! They also committed fraud on the Courts, used falsified evidence, and concealed evidence that would exonerate President Trump and American Citizens in prison in Washington DC for the Jan 6th setup by our treasonous government, DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, DNC, DNI, and RINO's covering up their criminal and treasonous bribery and money laundering deals with cartels, terrorists and foreign governments.

I hope she has good security. The left has declared assassinations a valid form of protest.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Because it's completely legal and normal to use evidence from out-of-district grand juries. The law specifically says it's okay.

And because the Trump team didn't raise the defense. Judge Cannon raised it. It's not a judge' s job to fake crazy law-defying rulings on behalf of one side, and doing so indicates blatant bias.

Is there not a case that the defence is so inept the learned judge has stepped in to see fair play ?

 

[struth]

Because it's completely legal and normal to use evidence from out-of-district grand juries. The law specifically says it's okay.

And because the Trump team didn't raise the defense. Judge Cannon raised it. It's not a judge' s job to fake crazy law-defying rulings on behalf of one side, and doing so indicates blatant bias.

But that's not what the Judge is asking. Try again. Well it's also not a defense...and additionally, yes the Judge is allowed to raise issues sua sponte....yes, Judges routinely raises issues sua sponte.

sua sponte

www.law.cornell.edu

Latin for "of one's own accord; voluntarily." Used to indicate that a court has taken notice of an issue on its own motion without prompting or suggestion from either party.

As a general rule, where grounds for dismissal exist, an action is subject to dismissal on a court's own motion. A trial court has the power to dismiss an action sua sponte for want of prosecution, or failure to comply with the rules of civil procedure or a court's orders. A court may sua sponte enter a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction even though both parties have agreed to appear in the court.

See, e.g., Carlisle v. United States, 517 US 416 (1996) and Trest v. Cain, 522 US 87 (1997).

 

[EvilCat Breath]

And she flopped on her face hilariously, so now the whole legal profession is laughing at her, hard. Again.

This isn't a fair fight. Jack Smith is one of the best legal minds in the world, while judge Cannon is an affirmative action hack.

It's totally legal for federal grand juries to share info. That's what the law says. Judge Cannon's knowledge of the law ranks somewhere below that of a second-year law school student.

Judges can get dismissed for blatant bias, and pulling a fake legal defense out of your ass to help one side certainly qualifies.

Jack Smith has lost more cases than he won.

 

[eagle7-31]

And she flopped on her face hilariously, so now the whole legal profession is laughing at her, hard. Again.

This isn't a fair fight. Jack Smith is one of the best legal minds in the world, while judge Cannon is an affirmative action hack.

It's totally legal for federal grand juries to share info. That's what the law says. Judge Cannon's knowledge of the law ranks somewhere below that of a second-year law school student.

Judges can get dismissed for blatant bias, and pulling a fake legal defense out of your ass to help one side certainly qualifies.

This isn't a fair fight. Jack Smith is one of the best legal minds in the world, while judge Cannon is an affirmative action hack.

that's a laugh Smith's conviction of Va Gov Bob McDowell was overturned by the USSC 8-0. Try again.

 

[Kilroy2]

Makes sense if you don't think about it too much.

But all federal judges sitting today were nominated by either a Democrat or a Republican. If every Republican appointee, or even every Trump appointee has to recuse themselves, that leaves Trump to be tried only by Democrats, or by a Republican who would have to be specifically chosen for being a Republican. Either way, it would seem highly political.

But, we have to expect that. The cases against Trump are purely political. No Democrat president or candidate would ever be prosecuted the way Trump is being prosecuted. When you politicize the justice system, it seems foolish to complain about the justice system being politicized.

Not claiming that Cannon is unbiased. Her telling Nauta (his lawyers, really) to tell her what they think of the prosecutor's propriety does sound like she's fishing for something to attack the prosecutor for.

Ok, so be it. An incredibly biased prosecution is being countered by a biased judge. Still won't be fair, because the whole thing lost all pretense of fairness long ago. But whining and crying because Trump has one judge in his favor is laughable.

Judges take a oath to uphold the law and not have an allegiance to uphold a party. Unlike the rank and file who have no allegiance to the law but do to a party. So they do not trust judges unless they are affiliated to said party. So if people hold judges up to the standard of upholding the law then they would complain but at least it would be fair.

 

[Doc7505]

Who exactly was screaming?

The Leftist media!

 

[Slade3200]

The Leftist media!

Haha, oh. Can you show an example of this screaming? Sounds funny

 

[JoeB131]

But, we have to expect that. The cases against Trump are purely political. No Democrat president or candidate would ever be prosecuted the way Trump is being prosecuted. When you politicize the justice system, it seems foolish to complain about the justice system being politicized.

No Democrat and most other Republicans wouldn't pull the shit Trump tried to pull.

In fact, our government has lasted as long as it has BECAUSE we have had a couple dozen transfers of power between the parties and no one tried to pull what Trump tried to pull.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No Democrat and most other Republicans wouldn't pull the shit Trump tried to pull.

In fact, our government has lasted as long as it has BECAUSE we have had a couple dozen transfers of power between the parties and no one tried to pull what Trump tried to pull.

What Trump did was no worse than what Gore did in 2000. Those college-age transgirls that make up the Dem base may not remember that, but I do.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

How did she fall on her face? And what’s the blatant bias in not simply doing whatever the xiden admin wants?

So you believe the almost 80 charges are just made up, you don't think these prosecutors spent a lot of hours looking over the evidence before choosing to indict a former POTUS? Just be honest for once, you really don't care if Trump broke the Law or not. Do you?

 

[struth]

So you believe the almost 80 charges are just made up, you don't think these prosecutors spent a lot of hours looking over the evidence before choosing to indict a former POTUS? Just be honest for once, you really don't care if Trump broke the Law or not. Do you?

No the charges are very real. We are seeing a real life political prosecution in this country, much like we’ve seen in other leftist regimes, like national socialist Germany. Saddam s Iraq, castro’s cuba, statin and putin’s russia, China etc