Why can't liberals be honest about ANYTHING?

So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

You're an idiot.

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

He said excellent health care is by definition redistributive, because the poor and the elderly are often the sickest.

And the right said "how can we put someone who thinks that in charge of Medicare and Medicaid?!"

Not exactly members of Mensa, those folks. Look up what Medicare and Medicaid are and you'll get the joke.
 
Berwick was the best man for the job and did it to widespread praise. None of the wingnuts ever complained about what he did, they complained about some speech he gave to the Brits.

As I said, it's pretty widely agreed he did an excellent job at CMS. Which is how appointments ought to turn out.

So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

:eusa_shhh:
 
Berwick was the best man for the job and did it to widespread praise. None of the wingnuts ever complained about what he did, they complained about some speech he gave to the Brits.

As I said, it's pretty widely agreed he did an excellent job at CMS. Which is how appointments ought to turn out.

So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

LMAO! My friend, you clearly have no idea what "socialism" is.

Socialism is an ECONOMIC system. At what point did our military start controlling our economy? :rofl:
 
So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

:eusa_shhh:

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" :)rofl:). I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)
 
So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

LMAO! My friend, you clearly have no idea what "socialism" is.

Socialism is an ECONOMIC system. At what point did our military start controlling our economy? :rofl:

:lol:

Really?

I mean really?

What do you think the "Fiscal Cliff" is all about.

There are HUGE CUTS to military spending.

That's going to shitcan ALOT of jobs.

Catch up..
 
You really need to stop smoking the GlennGrass. It'll rot your brain.

Yeah, why get the facts when you can just load up on the liberal nazi propaganda spoon fed to you by MSNBC? Who wants the truth when the truth is so inconvenient, right old guy?


If you really think ol' Glenn has any real FACTS, you really have been smoking too much of it.

Have you ever checked out his "facts?" Or, do you just swallow them whole?
 
Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

:eusa_shhh:

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" :)rofl:). I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)

ROADS ARE SOCIALISM.

Get a grip.

Doesn't matter if it's local or federal.
 
So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

You're an idiot.

I don't care how good he was, if his end game is to transform America from capitalism to socialism, then he is a serious threat to this nation.

He said excellent health care is by definition redistributive, because the poor and the elderly are often the sickest.

And the right said "how can we put someone who thinks that in charge of Medicare and Medicaid?!"

Not exactly members of Mensa, those folks. Look up what Medicare and Medicaid are and you'll get the joke.

He also said how much he LOVES (literally started to talk in sexual terms if you saw the ENTIRE video) a single payer system, because it is redistributive. Why anyone believes they are entitled to what someone else has is mind-boggling.

Tell me Greenbeard, did you NOT have a mother? If you did, didn't she ever teach that you don't take what doesn't belong to you?
 
Are you serious?

Lets start with the military.

In it's current configuration..it's the most socialistic part of the United States.

You want that stopped?

What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

:eusa_shhh:

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" :)rofl:). I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)


So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?
 
So if a Republican president in 2016 appoints someone who is on record stating that they would like to hold ALL liberals in concentration camps and execute them, you'll support that 100% so long as they "do a good job" at their appointed position? Really? Really?

You're an idiot.

That's liberal code word for "you've put the shoe on the other foot, I really don't like it, and I'm left with no intelligent response for it" :rofl:

Suddenly how good someone is at their job doesn't mean quite so much if they have dangerous, radical idea's, uh? But God forbid you admit you were wrong...
 
What?

Rotty not picking up on this?

Color me shocked.

NEWSFLASH: US Mail is also socialist. And it's in the Constitution.

:eusa_shhh:

Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" :)rofl:). I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)


So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point! :lol:
 
I was just looking at all the corporate campaign contributions to Obama for this recent election.

Too bad you couldn't relay this info to them quicker Rottie, they inadvertently supported someone that's looking to take full control of their company and profits.

They must not be very bright.
 
Liberals can't be honest about their intentions or they wouldn't be elected.

They must lie about themselves, then lie about the intentions of their opponents.

Sadly, their voter base is very compliant and very dense, and swallows it all whole, without so much as a sniff.
 
(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)


Really? There's no federal money involved in road building? Are you SURE about that?

Not constitutionally. Just because Obama tried to buy another term by throwing around federal dollars on roads in Columbus, Ohio and Oregon doesn't mean that's the norm. It's the exception to the rule genius, and more unconstitutional action by the dumbocrats.
 
Which is why we shouldn't have it and why it is many BILLIONS in debt (more proof that socialism doesn't work, but hey, don't let the facts get in your way, right?).

Let me guess, next will be "roads are socialism" :)rofl:). I just love when liberals are pinned into a corner with facts and scream "roads" as a last, desperate plea...

(hint: roads happen at the local level - NOT the federal level)


So, the debt Ronald Reagan run up with defense spending was "socialist?" Doesn't it therefore follow that Reagan was a socialist? Why, or why not?

Defense is not socialist. It's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government (you might want to read that very important document some time).

It's always amusing though to watch you guys scramble to twist things in your desperation to make a point! :lol:

Defense is income redistribution: Take from the citizens and give to the defense industry. And, income redistribution is socialist...right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top