Why Alvin and not the Feds? Or, why Cohen and not Individual 1?

Absurd whataboutisms noted. Trump stood in front of reporters and lied about a check he had written to reimburse Cohen for the hush money payment to Daniels while he was sitting in the Oval office. All in an attempt to keep his sexual affair with a porn star from the voting public just before the election. Or, what could accurately be described as election interference.

Hillary wasn't even aware that Marc Elias had hired Fusion GPS to continue oppo research on Trump initially arranged for by Repubs. Additionally, Elias was not aware of Steele's methods, sources, or even who he was. Finally, while existence of the dossier was leaked to the media late in the campaign Hillary never used its specific contents while campaigning.

As for Obama's fine, The major sticking point for the FEC appeared to be a series of missing 48-hour notices for nearly 1,300 contributions totaling more than $1.8 million — an issue that lawyers familiar with the commission’s work say the FEC takes seriously. The notices must be filed on contributions of $1,000 or more that are received within the 20-day window of Election Day.

How's them apples, cuck?

Stop "noting" things, stick your head out of your fucking echo chamber and LEARN something.
 
Nothing against the author of the OP, but this is something that irks me.

Paying someone "Hush Money" to not talk about getting boinked by a man whose wife was home having just given birth to his son.

Paying the money was totally legal, it was the way the money was paid that was illegal. For example campaign finance criminal actions by Cohen, falsification of business records - those are illegal.

If the law had been followed right before the election FPOTUS#45 would not be in legal jeopardy:
  • Cohen and Stormy attorney agree on NDA
  • Stormy and FPOTUS#45 sign the agreement and FPOTUS#45 signs a certified check over to Stormy.
  • FPOTUS#45 files the campaign (in-kind) contribution to his campaign financial officer. ***

*** NOTE: Candidates can make unlimited direct contributions (cash) or in-kind contributions (non-cash) to the campaign, however under federal law they are still required to report it. Since the event occurred just days before the election the contributions would not have been reported to the FEC until after the election.

WW
Weird how the FEC didn’t see anything wrong with it.
 
Weird how the FEC didn’t see anything wrong with it.

The FEC has nothing to do with felonious falsification of State business records.

Seeing how FEC investigators recommended investigation and the investigation was blocked by GOP commission members, not weird at all.

Cohen wasn't convicted by the FEC, it was in federal criminal court.

WW
 
Expect Daniels didn't attempt to extort anyone.

She contacted her attorney, the attorney was shopping the story about to various media outlets. The intent was to make money from the media.

The campaign found out (through David Pecker), contacted the campaign, and the campaign contacted her.

WW
LOL Still going with "She was an innocent victim" in this, huh?
 
Dear Cultist -

Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime, that involved Trump in a failed attempt to gain favor
with the court - It failed.

Again, at one time there may, at most have been a corporate bookkeeping error.

You should read information that doesn't come just from your Cult.
You know to be well rounded, and all.
No one has even explained how it was a bookeeping error
 
LOL Still going with "She was an innocent victim" in this, huh?

Where did I say Daniels was the victim?

She had sex with FPOTUS#45, he paid her to prevent the information from coming out in the press just prior to the election, she made $130,000 for the transaction.

She was later released from the NDA and can now tell her story.

I don't see victimhood in that.

WW
 
LOL You can't explain it either. Yet you are are 100% behind FatFuck Bragg's prosecution of the former PResident

I've explained it hundreds of times.

Dozens probably to you personally, you go away and then come back with the same question.

Read it for yourself, or not, your choice.

WW
 
LOL You can't explain it either. Yet you are are 100% behind FatFuck Bragg's prosecution of the former PResident

What the clown doesn't want to admit is that for all intent and purposes, the corporation did not cross a "T" on a document which was then copied 33 times and then it was linked to a form where the "i" wasn't doted.

It is really little more than that.
 
This is nothing more than, what is good for congress is not good for the public.

Congress had it's own hush money fund to pay off the lovers of all the congressman. Now, suddenly, when it comes to Trump, what Congress did for decades is no longer legal?

The difference is Congress does this LEGALY.

Trump wasn't charged for fucking or paying off women. He was charged for fraudulently recording such campaign related payments to conceal their true nature.
 
Last edited:
What the clown doesn't want to admit is that for all intent and purposes, the corporation did not cross a "T" on a document which was then copied 33 times and then it was linked to a form where the "i" wasn't doted.

It is really little more than that.
I don't even see that. They paid their attorney by check.

What this law is actually used for is criminals submitting false insurance claims.
 
“[Bragg] had to attach it to a supposed election law violation, well it’s not, Federal Election Commission investigated, and they said this is perfectly legal. It is not a campaign donation.

The DOJ concluded there is no crime here,” he added. “But, you know, enter Alvin Bragg who is charging under federal law even though he is a local prosecutor and has no jurisdiction and authority to do that.

But the judge is letting him get away with it.” ( for now)

... so the statute of limitations ran out on not crossing the T and the not doting the I was already deemed to not be a crime.
 
“[Bragg] had to attach it to a supposed election law violation, well it’s not, Federal Election Commission investigated, and they said this is perfectly legal. It is not a campaign donation.

The DOJ concluded there is no crime here,” he added. “But, you know, enter Alvin Bragg who is charging under federal law even though he is a local prosecutor and has no jurisdiction and authority to do that.

But the judge is letting him get away with it.” ( for now)

... so the statute of limitations ran out on not crossing the T and the not doting the I was already deemed to not be a crime.
Complete clusterfuck. And it's only going to get worse for them when they put up their star witness Cohen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top