Where is the Liberal outrage?????

See the far left will do all it can to cover the fact that they are the problem and that they will never accept responsibility for anything they do.

They would much rather watch the world burn than admit they are wrong!

As anyone here can see, there will be no outrage from the far left on such things as it does not fit their programmed narrative..

It's just "the left"... there's no such thing as a 'Far Left'.
sure there isnt.....
 
I'm a liberal, and I am outraged. I am outraged that any kid can buy a firearm in most states without a mandatory background check.

Do you think those shitheads that did the shooting would have been stopped by a background check?

It doesn't stop the daily shootings in Chicago with the toughest gun laws in the country so why do you think it would stop the bad guys in Milwaukee? Bad guys don't do background checks.

Background checks sucks for two reasons; they don't work and it is the government requiring permission for a Constitutional right.

Well, I am relieved that convicted felons and mentally ill people have a constitutional right to buy a firearm. Since John Hinckley is no longer incarcerated, my heart swells with pride that in the USA nobody would be convicted for failure to run a background check on him the next time he decides to impress his girlfriend with a gun!
 
See the far left will do all it can to cover the fact that they are the problem and that they will never accept responsibility for anything they do.

They would much rather watch the world burn than admit they are wrong!

As anyone here can see, there will be no outrage from the far left on such things as it does not fit their programmed narrative..

It's just "the left"... there's no such thing as a 'Far Left'.

Wrong!
 
See the far left will do all it can to cover the fact that they are the problem and that they will never accept responsibility for anything they do.

They would much rather watch the world burn than admit they are wrong!

As anyone here can see, there will be no outrage from the far left on such things as it does not fit their programmed narrative..

It's just "the left"... there's no such thing as a 'Far Left'.

Wrong!

We can't let Kosh lose her catchphrase guys
 
See the far left will do all it can to cover the fact that they are the problem and that they will never accept responsibility for anything they do.

They would much rather watch the world burn than admit they are wrong!

As anyone here can see, there will be no outrage from the far left on such things as it does not fit their programmed narrative..

It's just "the left"... there's no such thing as a 'Far Left'.
sure there isnt.....

What is the difference? Give us some examples of views and candidates who are left and far left.
 
See the far left will do all it can to cover the fact that they are the problem and that they will never accept responsibility for anything they do.

They would much rather watch the world burn than admit they are wrong!

As anyone here can see, there will be no outrage from the far left on such things as it does not fit their programmed narrative..

It's just "the left"... there's no such thing as a 'Far Left'.

Wrong!

No... there is only 'the Left'. FYI: There is also no 'far-evil'. Just evil.

And the left and evil... are synonymous.
 
Well, I am relieved that convicted felons and mentally ill people have a constitutional right to buy a firearm. Since John Hinckley is no longer incarcerated, my heart swells with pride that in the USA nobody would be convicted for failure to run a background check on him the next time he decides to impress his girlfriend with a gun!

If John Hinckley was released and wanted to shoot somebody else then no background check you can imagine would keep him from getting a firearm. You know that as good as I do. If you don't know it then you are a world class dumbshit.

Background checks are feel good exercises for stupid Liberals and would do absolutely nothing to stop crime. Just look at all the shootings every day in Chicago with the strictest gun laws in the country.

Stupid Liberals love background checks because it put a right guaranteed in the Bill of Rights (that they never liked in the first place) in the hands of the filthy government to dish out as they please.

If liberals were really serious about keeping firearms out of the hands of crazy people they would have backed the Grassley Cruz bill but instead the Democrats voted it down so don't pretend that the Libtards really give a shit.
 
Liberals believe in background checks for the right to keep and bear arms, which is a right guaranteed in the Constitution, but they don't believe in somebody having to establish proper identification before voting. Then they wonder why we call them Moon Bats.
 
Liberals believe in background checks for the right to keep and bear arms, which is a right guaranteed in the Constitution, but they don't believe in somebody having to establish proper identification before voting. Then they wonder why we call them Moon Bats.

Well, then, if it is unconstitutional, as you claim, for the government to put conditional approval on 2nd amendments rights, then, by all means, the laws against felons and mentally ill people owning a gun should be repealed. In fact, by your definition, it is unconstitutional to deny an incarcerated prisoner to own a firearm.
 
Last edited:
Liberals believe in background checks for the right to keep and bear arms, which is a right guaranteed in the Constitution, but they don't believe in somebody having to establish proper identification before voting. Then they wonder why we call them Moon Bats.
When you issue photo ID to all citizens, like other nations do, just think of how easy it will be to check it for guns and voting, and to know who is supposed to be here. Papers please...
 
"Well, then, if it is unconstitutional, as you claim, for the government to put conditional approval on 2nd amendments rights, then, by all means, the laws against felons and mentally ill people owning a gun should be repealed. In fact, by your definition, it is unconstitutional to deny an incarcerated prisoner to own a firearm."
Vandal

So, Flash, do you want to keep digging that hole, or would you prefer to move the goal post?
 
[

Well, then, if it is unconstitutional, as you claim, for the government to put conditional approval on 2nd amendments rights, then, by all means, the laws against felons and mentally ill people owning a gun should be repealed. In fact, by your definition, it is unconstitutional to deny an incarcerated prisoner to own a firearm.

We have to fill out a stupid form to buy a firearm from a license dealer because of the ridiculous gut reaction response to John Kennedy being shot like having a form 4473 would have stopped Oswald.

All Americans have to go through a stupid background check to buy firearms from a license dealer because of the ridiculous gut reaction to some idiot shooting Reagan as if a background check would have stopped Hinckley, who would have passed a background check at the time he bought the firearm that shot Reagan .

Most gun crimes are with stolen weapons. No background checks will stop that. As we have seen in the recent high profile shooting very few of those crimes would have been prevented with a background check. They simply do nothing of substance to stop crime. They are only a pathetic feel good waste of time to placate Moon Bats.

Besides not working the real problem with background checks is that it establish the requirement that a citizen must get approval for the filthy ass government in order to enjoy a right guaranteed under the Bill of Rights. A right that has the words "shall not be infringed" written into it. That is simply wrong.
 
So, Flash can't fucking read and he is an over emotional ninny. Good to know.


I'm out of liberal outrage today.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top