I know. My pretty pink lungs.
well.. pink something..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know. My pretty pink lungs.
Actually I find your literary gaffes and rantings humorous.I believe it, as I've witnessed acts of intolerance by religious persons, fellow Catholics actually, first hand. But I agree with you that atheists/ agnostics are also intolerant, many more so and more vehement, as evidenced by many examples in this forum. Here's a recent example: http://www.usmessageboard.com/763697-post172.html
Unfortunately for you, FACTS are not "tolorant" [sic] of ideals that are unfounded bullshit with nary the slightest iota of evidence to offer.
You know.. like Franklins [sic] AUTOBIOGRAPHY!
poor guy.. go ahead and lash out though. It's cute in a "toddler stomping his foot" sorta way.
Actually I find your literary gaffes and rantings humorous.
Oh? Ok then, let's put your bullshit under the microscope:Wow you've run out of material now, too.
This never happened. You made this shit up. I denied YOUR reading of three different definitions, these being:Interesting tactic: deny the dictionary definition,...
AND these offered by mede•ism: a movement or system of thought advocating natural religion, emphasizing morality, and in the 18th century denying the interference of the Creator with the laws of the universe
Deism Defined
Deism is defined in Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1941, as: "[From Latin Deus, God.Deity] The doctrine or creed of a Deist." And Deist is defined in the same dictionary as: "One who believes in the existence of a God or supreme being but denies revealed religion, basing his belief on the light of nature and reason." The above definition is from a non-Deist source. Please see our expanded definition of Deism in our Deist Glossary below.
Deism: Deism is the recognition of a universal creative force greater than that demonstrated by mankind, supported by personal observation of laws and designs in nature and the universe, perpetuated and validated by the innate ability of human reason coupled with the rejection of claims made by individuals and organized religions of having received special divine revelation. [emphasis later added by Glockmail]
This, based upon some shit you made up.Wow that’s a stretch. Praying to a god that isn’t listening is good for the soul that he doesn’t care about.
This is patently false on it's face, and your conclusion is based upon some foundation that is just some more shit you made up.Actually no, since a deist denies that his god can impact his life.
No definition I submitted is my own (another piece of completely made up shit on your part), and the definitions I offered in no way assert or support that Deists believe God does not care about human beings, or that Deists believe God cannot intervene in his creation. Those are conclusions, Glockmail, derived from shit you made up....put forth your own that reinforces the dictionary definition,...
This, of course, never happened either. I claimed you were wrong; and you are--patently so....claim victory,...
If your bullshit accusations are what constitutes "getting called on it", then I suppose you're right, but I fail to see your point, since you just make up all this shit anyway....get called on it,...
By "repeat", you must mean repeatedly pointing out your glaring errors in logic and fact, proving you to be utterly wrong, completely out of your mind, and an unrepentant liar....repeat.
You no doubt find it amusing, otherwise you would not insist upon being such a monument to disingenuous falsehood, and prima-facie denial of reality.Amusing, but I did expect better from the Great LOki.
Wow so much bluster. Too bad there's nothing new here.Oh? Ok then, let's put your bullshit under the microscope:This never happened. You made this shit up. I denied YOUR reading of three different definitions, these being:
This offered by Glockmail:AND these offered by me
From these definitions, Glockmail, you conclude that Deists belive that God does not care about the people He created--This, based upon some shit you made up.
Then you further conclude that Deists believe God cannot intervene in his creation. This is patently false on it's face, and your conclusion is based upon some foundation that is just some more shit you made up.
No definition I submitted is my own (another piece of completely made up shit on your part), and the definitions I offered in no way assert or support that Deists believe God does not care about human beings, or that Deists believe God cannot intervene in his creation. Those are conclusions, Glockmail, derived from shit you made up.
This, of course, never happened either. I claimed you were wrong; and you are--patently so.
If your bullshit accusations are what constitutes "getting called on it", then I suppose you're right, but I fail to see your point, since you just make up all this shit anyway.
By "repeat", you must mean repeatedly pointing out your glaring errors in logic and fact, proving you to be utterly wrong, completely out of your mind, and an unrepentant liar.
You no doubt find it amusing, otherwise you would not insist upon being such a monument to disingenuous falsehood, and prima-facie denial of reality.
More made up shit.Wow so much bluster.
For something new to happen, you'd have present a valid argument--you'd have to be right.Too bad there's nothing new here.
Which you have been unable to do.More made up shit.
For something new to happen, you'd have present a valid argument--you'd have to be right.
Which you have been unable to do.More made up shit.
For something new to happen, you'd have present a valid argument--you'd have to be right.
But they do not support your conclusion, since this still does not say God cannot intervene in the world.Oh, lookie here, more deists support the actual definition, : Deism has become identified with the classical belief that God created but does not intervene in the world, though this is not a necessary component of deism.
So many Deists in fact DO believe prayer is good (which you have flatly denied), AND still nothing here that asserts Deists believe that God doesn't care, nor anything asserting that they believe God cannot intervene in His creation.Many deists who do not believe in divine intervention still find value in prayer. They think of it as a form of meditation and self-cleansing, which can improve one's life and lead to one's efforts being more effective. However, many deists consider all prayer an attempt to establish a personal relationship with God, something deists do not believe is possible. Temple of Reason
You should note, Glockmail, that this definition does not assert that God doesn't care about human beings, or assert that God cannot intervene in His creation."Historical and modern Deism is defined by the view that reason, rather than revelation or tradition, should be the basis of belief in God. Deists reject both organized and revealed religion and maintain that reason is the essential element in all knowledge. For a "rational basis for religion" they refer to the cosmological argument (first cause argument), the teleological argument (argument from design), and other aspects of what was called natural religion. Deism has become identified with the classical belief that God created but does not intervene in the world, though this is not a necessary component of deism."
Obviously you've never been to a track meet or participated in one, have you?....As the track official said to the last runner, "Give it up, the race is over, LOSER!"......
As the track team's bus driver said to the last runner, "Have fun walking home, LOSER!" .....