Nonelitist
Rookie
- Jan 22, 2010
- 1,235
- 183
- 0
- Banned
- #141
I have no idea why you would think that. The answer is obviously no. But if you'd like to expose him to drug abuse all you have to do is take a ride through the Kansas countryside, where you can smell the meth fumes for miles. If you want murder, just bring him into Kansas City. No reason to come this far for all that.
Good for you. I don't give a fuck honestly.
Another example of a right wing lunatic making up my thoughts for me.
You are correct. I could go into the areas of KC that have bad crime and schools.
Hey I'd love to live in a better area of New Orleans. Don't have the money, but just remember, you're the nonelitist and I'm the elitist.
Only meth use, right? In 2008 4 times as much meth was seized in Kansas than in Louisiana, and Kansas has a little more half the population of Louisiana.Meth houses in my area aren't tolerated.
DEA, Stats & Facts
Sorry, but I'd rather my kid get drunk every now and then than get hooked on meth. And if you think you can somehow shield your kid from that shit, just wait till he gets to high school. There's the same amount of illegal drugs in private schools - they're just better drugs. I'd be far more worried about my kid being exposed to unregulated illegal substances than to a regulated substance which is enjoyed responsibly by the vast majority of adults.
Yes, you are also correct, there are drugs everywhere. Hopefully I do a good job teaching him to be responsible and to avoid drugs and those that do them.
I have lived in Kansas all my life. I have never known anyone that has done meth. From my understanding, it is pretty obvious when someone is hooked on meth. But I am sure it is around, just like anywhere.
I still wouldn't trade where I live for where you live. Not even close.