What do you do? Cop shows up to door saying they want your child to come out...

In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.
If the cops didn't know that the boy was in the home, then they can't just break into the home and search for the boy to arrest him without a warrant.
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.

But they never said it was for an arrest. They explicitly said it was to write a ticket and they cant forcibly enter a home for a citation. Right?
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.

But they never said it was for an arrest. They explicitly said it was to write a ticket and they cant forcibly enter a home for a citation. Right?

That is correct.
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.
If the cops didn't know that the boy was in the home, then they can't just break into the home and search for the boy to arrest him without a warrant.

They don't have to 'know', they have to have reasonable belief.

Going to a known offenders last known address is sufficient grounds to enter.
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.

But they never said it was for an arrest. They explicitly said it was to write a ticket and they cant forcibly enter a home for a citation. Right?

But the boy was arrested, correct?
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.
If the cops didn't know that the boy was in the home, then they can't just break into the home and search for the boy to arrest him without a warrant.

They don't have to 'know', they have to have reasonable belief.

Going to a known offenders last known address is sufficient grounds to enter.
I don't think you are correct about that.
 
In this situation are you required to come out of your home?

Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.

But they never said it was for an arrest. They explicitly said it was to write a ticket and they cant forcibly enter a home for a citation. Right?

But the boy was arrested, correct?

Yeah, I'm not sure why tho
 
Yes. Police don't require a warrant to arrest if they have belief on reasonable grounds an offence is or has been committed.

They have the right to enter the address, but their search powers are limited.
It seems to me that the cops would need a warrant to go into the home in this case. The cops didn't go into the home and it appears that they did not have a warrant, hence the ruse about writing the 16 year old a ticket. If the cops had been in "hot pursuit" (Regards to Roscoe P. Coltrane), then the cops could have pursued the boy into the home to apprehend him. That being said, chasing a boy down over not wearing a bicycle helmet is ridiculous.

It's always better to not enter a home. People's homes are an unknown tactical situation. There could be guns and there will be knives.

Getting the suspect outside and in the open is the safer option.

But, no. A warrant is required to search a home. But not to enter a home to affect the arrest.

But they never said it was for an arrest. They explicitly said it was to write a ticket and they cant forcibly enter a home for a citation. Right?

But the boy was arrested, correct?

Yeah, I'm not sure why tho
It would be nice if Paul Harvey (may he rest in peace) could give us the rest of the story.
 
Heres the scenario I saw. A kid of about 15 is riding his bike when the cops start to follow them. Kid goes home and the cop says they want to write the kid a ticket for riding a bike without a helmet. Parents ask why there are about 7 cops on his lawn for a ticket.

Cop says they chased the kid and he needs to come out like "a big boy". Parents send their child outside who is then arrested and taken away.

In the comments it was suggested that the parents should've just not answered the door and / or force them to get a warrant to access the home if a helmet violation was such a big deal.

In this situation are you required to come out of your home?
Democrats are extreme authoritarians. This kind of bullshit happens all the time in Democrat controlled cities. And the more you keep voting Democrat the worse the oppression will become.
 
Heres the scenario I saw. A kid of about 15 is riding his bike when the cops start to follow them. Kid goes home and the cop says they want to write the kid a ticket for riding a bike without a helmet. Parents ask why there are about 7 cops on his lawn for a ticket.

Cop says they chased the kid and he needs to come out like "a big boy". Parents send their child outside who is then arrested and taken away.

In the comments it was suggested that the parents should've just not answered the door and / or force them to get a warrant to access the home if a helmet violation was such a big deal.

In this situation are you required to come out of your home?
Democrats are extreme authoritarians. This kind of bullshit happens all the time in Democrat controlled cities. And the more you keep voting Democrat the worse the oppression will become.


This happens everywhere and it has more to do with what people do when given power than how a city votes. In fact, voting patterns have no bearing on this no more than saying this happens in places where more people have dandruff
 
Very Mouthy talk to those Officers of the Law by the "recorder". Lock him up too. Probation violation anyone? You heard it here first. There is something going on. You're welcome in advance CC.
 
Very Mouthy talk to those Officers of the Law by the "recorder". Lock him up too. Probation violation anyone? You heard it here first. There is something going on. You're welcome in advance CC.

Talking isn't against the law yet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top